Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
- Nom De Plume
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm
Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin.
Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”
https://science.thewire.in/health/tn-re ... -patients/
Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr. Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using her position as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.
https://indianbarassociation.in/press-releases/
Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
In particular, the Indian Bar brief referenced the peer-reviewed publications and evidence compiled by the ten-member Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) group and the 65-member British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel headed by WHO consultant and meta-analysis expert Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The brief cited US Attorney Ralph C. Lorigo’s hospital cases in New York where court orders were required for dying COVID patients to receive the Ivermectin. In multiple instances of such comatose patients, following the court-ordered Ivermectin, the patients recovered. In addition, the Indian Bar Association cited previous articles published in this forum, The Desert Review.
Advocate Ojha accused the WHO and Dr. Swaminathan in Points 60 and 61 as having misled and misguided the Indian people throughout the pandemic from mask wear to exonerating China as to the virus's origins.
“The world is gradually waking up to your absurd, arbitrary and fallacious approach in presenting concocted facts as ‘scientific approach.’ While the WHO flaunts itself like a ‘know it all,’ it is akin to the vain Emperor in new clothes while the entire world has realized by now, the Emperor has no clothes at all.”
The brief accused the WHO of being complicit in a vast disinformation campaign. Point 61 states, “The FLCCC and the BIRD have shown exemplary courage in building a formidable force to tackle the challenge of disinformation, resistance, and rebuke from pharma lobbies and powerful health interests like WHO, NIH, CDC, and regulators like the US FDA.”
Dr. Swaminathan was called out for her malfeasance in discrediting Ivermectin to preserve the EUA for the vaccine and pharmaceutical industry. Point 52 reads, “It seems you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals, and this is sufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against you.”
The Indian Bar Association posted an update on their website June 5, 2021, noting that Dr. Swaminathan had deleted her now-infamous tweet. They wrote, "However, deleting the tweet will not save Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and her associates from the criminal prosecution which is to be launched by the citizens with active support from the Indian Bar Association."
https://indianbarassociation.in/blogs-iba/
In this update, Advocate Dipali Ojha clarified the nature of the planned action,
"The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment."
He further wrote, "After receiving the said notice, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan went on the back foot and deleted her tweet. This has proved the hollowness of the WHO’s recommendation against Ivermectin for COVID-19. The dishonesty of WHO and the act of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan in deleting her contentious tweet was witnessed by citizens across the world, as the news got a wide coverage on social media. By deleting the tweet, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has proved her mala fide intentions."
The entire world witnessed the effectiveness of Ivermectin against India’s deadly second surge as the locations that adopted it saw their outbreaks quickly extinguished in stark contrast to those states that did not.
Among the most prominent examples include the Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa where cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. By contrast, Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin. As a result, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India. Tamil Nadu deaths increased ten-fold.
https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/na ... 25a08.html
Tamil Nadu publicly relied upon Dr. Swaminathan's advice in revoking their initial choice of Ivermectin the day after she recommended against it in her May 10 tweet on social media. As a direct result, Tamil Nadu experienced a surge in COVID death and sickness that continues to this day.
The Indian Bar Association dared to initiate a landmark court case against a Public Health Authority (PHA) to call out corruption and to save lives. As the courts in the United States proved to be the life-saving force to ensure a patient’s right to receive Ivermectin, a court in India is now doing the same.
Criminal prosecution of public health officials will send a powerful signal that disinformation campaigns resulting in death carry consequences. Perhaps this pathway will ultimately break the disinformation and censorship stranglehold around repurposed drug use to save lives. Maybe we will witness other countries following India’s example, both in medicine and in law.
https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion ... Ivermectin.
Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”
https://science.thewire.in/health/tn-re ... -patients/
Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr. Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using her position as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.
https://indianbarassociation.in/press-releases/
Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
In particular, the Indian Bar brief referenced the peer-reviewed publications and evidence compiled by the ten-member Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) group and the 65-member British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel headed by WHO consultant and meta-analysis expert Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The brief cited US Attorney Ralph C. Lorigo’s hospital cases in New York where court orders were required for dying COVID patients to receive the Ivermectin. In multiple instances of such comatose patients, following the court-ordered Ivermectin, the patients recovered. In addition, the Indian Bar Association cited previous articles published in this forum, The Desert Review.
Advocate Ojha accused the WHO and Dr. Swaminathan in Points 60 and 61 as having misled and misguided the Indian people throughout the pandemic from mask wear to exonerating China as to the virus's origins.
“The world is gradually waking up to your absurd, arbitrary and fallacious approach in presenting concocted facts as ‘scientific approach.’ While the WHO flaunts itself like a ‘know it all,’ it is akin to the vain Emperor in new clothes while the entire world has realized by now, the Emperor has no clothes at all.”
The brief accused the WHO of being complicit in a vast disinformation campaign. Point 61 states, “The FLCCC and the BIRD have shown exemplary courage in building a formidable force to tackle the challenge of disinformation, resistance, and rebuke from pharma lobbies and powerful health interests like WHO, NIH, CDC, and regulators like the US FDA.”
Dr. Swaminathan was called out for her malfeasance in discrediting Ivermectin to preserve the EUA for the vaccine and pharmaceutical industry. Point 52 reads, “It seems you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals, and this is sufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against you.”
The Indian Bar Association posted an update on their website June 5, 2021, noting that Dr. Swaminathan had deleted her now-infamous tweet. They wrote, "However, deleting the tweet will not save Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and her associates from the criminal prosecution which is to be launched by the citizens with active support from the Indian Bar Association."
https://indianbarassociation.in/blogs-iba/
In this update, Advocate Dipali Ojha clarified the nature of the planned action,
"The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment."
He further wrote, "After receiving the said notice, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan went on the back foot and deleted her tweet. This has proved the hollowness of the WHO’s recommendation against Ivermectin for COVID-19. The dishonesty of WHO and the act of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan in deleting her contentious tweet was witnessed by citizens across the world, as the news got a wide coverage on social media. By deleting the tweet, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has proved her mala fide intentions."
The entire world witnessed the effectiveness of Ivermectin against India’s deadly second surge as the locations that adopted it saw their outbreaks quickly extinguished in stark contrast to those states that did not.
Among the most prominent examples include the Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa where cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. By contrast, Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin. As a result, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India. Tamil Nadu deaths increased ten-fold.
https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/na ... 25a08.html
Tamil Nadu publicly relied upon Dr. Swaminathan's advice in revoking their initial choice of Ivermectin the day after she recommended against it in her May 10 tweet on social media. As a direct result, Tamil Nadu experienced a surge in COVID death and sickness that continues to this day.
The Indian Bar Association dared to initiate a landmark court case against a Public Health Authority (PHA) to call out corruption and to save lives. As the courts in the United States proved to be the life-saving force to ensure a patient’s right to receive Ivermectin, a court in India is now doing the same.
Criminal prosecution of public health officials will send a powerful signal that disinformation campaigns resulting in death carry consequences. Perhaps this pathway will ultimately break the disinformation and censorship stranglehold around repurposed drug use to save lives. Maybe we will witness other countries following India’s example, both in medicine and in law.
https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion ... Ivermectin.
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- Nom De Plume
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
Interestingly, I tried to read a second source, for this news, but the only one that came up was...
Hmmm… can't reach this page... It looks like libertyjournal.org closed the connection
What is a closed connection?
Hmmm… can't reach this page... It looks like libertyjournal.org closed the connection
What is a closed connection?
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- Nom De Plume
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25683
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
I've posted about this somewhere but I can't remember the context. I'll try to find it to refresh my memory.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18214
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
In Melbourne -
we didn't need to be locked down for over 250 days and take vaccines.
Fucking Dan.
https://english.lematinal.media/indian- ... vermectin/
Indian State Of 241 Million People Declared COVID-Free
After Government Promotes Ivermectin
By
Staff
September 21, 2021
The state of Uttar Pradesh in India which has equivalent of two-thirds of the United States population, has been declared COVID-Free, the state government announced last week.
There are no more active cases of coronavirus in the 33 districts of Uttar Pradesh, which has a population of 241 million people. Hindustan news reported, “Overall, the state has a total of 199 active cases, while positivity rate came down to less than 0.01%. The recovery rate, meanwhile, has improved to 98.7%.”
The answer to the recovery is likely because the government’s early use and distribution of Ivermectin to its citizens. Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin. In May-June 2020, a team at Agra, led by Dr. Anshul Pareek, administered Ivermectin to all RRT team members in the district on an experimental basis. It was then observed that none of them developed COVID-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus.
we didn't need to be locked down for over 250 days and take vaccines.
Fucking Dan.
https://english.lematinal.media/indian- ... vermectin/
Indian State Of 241 Million People Declared COVID-Free
After Government Promotes Ivermectin
By
Staff
September 21, 2021
The state of Uttar Pradesh in India which has equivalent of two-thirds of the United States population, has been declared COVID-Free, the state government announced last week.
There are no more active cases of coronavirus in the 33 districts of Uttar Pradesh, which has a population of 241 million people. Hindustan news reported, “Overall, the state has a total of 199 active cases, while positivity rate came down to less than 0.01%. The recovery rate, meanwhile, has improved to 98.7%.”
The answer to the recovery is likely because the government’s early use and distribution of Ivermectin to its citizens. Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin. In May-June 2020, a team at Agra, led by Dr. Anshul Pareek, administered Ivermectin to all RRT team members in the district on an experimental basis. It was then observed that none of them developed COVID-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus.
- Gordon
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:16 pm
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
I still dont know if Ivermectin works, but there is definitely something fishy going on with all the censorship and the horse paste attack coverage.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18214
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25683
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
Follow the money.
Molnupiravir contains the same molecular qualities as Ivermectin. Same company, Merck. Molnupiravir $700 per pill Ivermectin $7 per pill.
https://www.jordanthrilla.com/post/deta ... iral-pill/
Molnupiravir contains the same molecular qualities as Ivermectin. Same company, Merck. Molnupiravir $700 per pill Ivermectin $7 per pill.
https://www.jordanthrilla.com/post/deta ... iral-pill/
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:55 pm
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
The Indian trial of Molnupiravir.
Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he contacted Merk wanting to run a trial of Ivermectin with a Japanese university. Merk said they weren't interested.
Ivermectin costs $168 USD per Kg to make. Since the average dose is 12Mg x 3 days it's a cheap drug. The WHO has tested Ivermectin up to 120Mg per day in humans with no increase in adverse effects. 3.7 Billion doses given worldwide with 4632 reported adverse effects.
For the vaccine to get Emergency Use Authorisation there has to be no alternative treatment EUA is never granted if something else is available. Pfizer are projecting over $35 billion profit this year from vaccine so plenty of reasons to smear Ivermectin.
I have said many times Big Pharma has more influence than the NRA in the US. I think it was 2 years ago opioid deaths outnumbered gun deaths with most being suicides yet this received very little attention. Big Pharma make a killing from selling opioids then they make more money selling drugs like narcan to reverse the effects of the opioids. Would it be unreasonable to ask Big Pharma to supply narcan for free when it's used as an antidote to their opioids?
Geert Vandenbossche has a remarkable resume a lifetime of work with vaccines and viral work he says avoid the vaccines and use Ivermectin.
6 weeks before Merk publicy smeared Ivermectin for Covid the US Government gave Merk $356 million for a new pill -https://www.pharmamanufacturing.com/ind ... 9-therapy/Merck drug less effective against moderate COVID -India regulatory source
NEW DELHI, Oct 8 (Reuters) - Merck & Co's (MRK.N) experimental antiviral drug molnupiravir has not shown "significant efficacy" against moderate COVID-19, a source with the Drug Controller General of India said.
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd wants to discontinue a late-stage trial of molnupiravir in moderate COVID-19 patients, the regulator's expert committee said on Friday.
"There is no significant efficacy against moderate COVID and the effective efficacy is towards mild cases," the source said on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the discussions.
The regulator and health ministry did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.
https://www.reuters.com/business/health ... 021-10-08/
Satoshi Omura won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin he contacted Merk wanting to run a trial of Ivermectin with a Japanese university. Merk said they weren't interested.
Ivermectin costs $168 USD per Kg to make. Since the average dose is 12Mg x 3 days it's a cheap drug. The WHO has tested Ivermectin up to 120Mg per day in humans with no increase in adverse effects. 3.7 Billion doses given worldwide with 4632 reported adverse effects.
For the vaccine to get Emergency Use Authorisation there has to be no alternative treatment EUA is never granted if something else is available. Pfizer are projecting over $35 billion profit this year from vaccine so plenty of reasons to smear Ivermectin.
I have said many times Big Pharma has more influence than the NRA in the US. I think it was 2 years ago opioid deaths outnumbered gun deaths with most being suicides yet this received very little attention. Big Pharma make a killing from selling opioids then they make more money selling drugs like narcan to reverse the effects of the opioids. Would it be unreasonable to ask Big Pharma to supply narcan for free when it's used as an antidote to their opioids?
Geert Vandenbossche has a remarkable resume a lifetime of work with vaccines and viral work he says avoid the vaccines and use Ivermectin.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18214
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Thu Oct 14, 2021 9:12 pmFollow the money.
Molnupiravir contains the same molecular qualities as Ivermectin. Same company, Merck. Molnupiravir $700 per pill Ivermectin $7 per pill.
https://www.jordanthrilla.com/post/deta ... iral-pill/
Looks like we were locked down and vaccinated for nothing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests