Religion fellatrix

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by IQSRLOW » Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:22 am

Dringy wrote:
IQSRLOW wrote:
For Monks benefit, what about Beastiality?

Yup
So it stands that you have no issue with consent....interesting

Where would you draw the line?
My dog likes to root my leg just about every night after she has her dinner. She taps me on the ankle and will not stop until I present my leg. Ten seconds and it's all over. It's a victimless crime. I would not try to poke my noodle into her coz she might bite it. Plus it might look a bit weird. See? Beings who cohabit work out a system. If they're happy, they stay, if they're not, they leave. Religious folk who wring their hands about what might be happening in the bedroom are surplus to requirements.

I could marry my dog, our 'sex' life would continue as it is now, and the world would not stop turning.
Jovial Monk however, likes poking his noodle into her. Is that still ok with you?

AiA in Atlanta

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:53 am

Why the fuss over Mel Gibson using the words "nigger" and "fluffy bunny" in private? What the real crime is is that slag of his secretly taping his tirade.

User avatar
J.W. Frogen
Posts: 470
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:11 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by J.W. Frogen » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:41 pm

It least the Jews got off light this time.

I would love to get Mel shitfaced and ask what he thinks about gay marriage?

Sappho

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Sappho » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:04 pm

Dringy wrote:People who get all wobbly about polygamy need to remember that our revered institution of marriage ends in divorce half the time. And that half of all married people have shagged someone behind their partner's back.

Given the stats, I see good reason to doubt that one-man-one-woman is the best system. Let's experiment.
You speaking my language. I'm all for experimentation. Had some of my most memorable and sexylicious experiences that way.

However, we need to clarify if it is civil marriage or religious marriage to which you are affording support. I would allow the former but not the latter, unless religious institutions are allowing of it.

User avatar
J.W. Frogen
Posts: 470
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:11 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by J.W. Frogen » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:03 pm

I am all for sexual experimentation too.

But if you are married you can not be honest about it.

Open marriages do not work, the jealousy genie always comes out of the bottle.

Best to live in a noble lie.

Hey, I am just trying to be honest about my lying.

Sappho

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Sappho » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:05 pm

And I'm not married or looking for a long term boredom... I mean relationship... so experimentation is not an issue for me.

None the less... there are many marrying types who should be allowed a civil marriage. How they play that marriage is their business.

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by IQSRLOW » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:24 pm

I am all for sexual experimentation too.

But if you are married you can not be honest about it.
You can be experimental and in a relationship.
Play together, stay together.

Sport fucking should be an olympic event

AiA in Atlanta

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:06 pm

Image

User avatar
J.W. Frogen
Posts: 470
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:11 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by J.W. Frogen » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:36 pm

Jesus loves threesomes, that is why there is a Trinity>

Badda bing badda boom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests