Religion fellatrix

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Swami Dring
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 pm

Religion fellatrix

Post by Swami Dring » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:34 pm

There is no way that a person who is both atheist and extremely smart would have a problem with gay marriage.

Idiocy or religion (both is ok too) is required in order to give a shit about who marries whom.

So Julia is pandering to the fucking demented religious vote. Nice. Even when talking about her atheism, she made an effort to lick the balls of religion by talking about her respect for religious beliefs. Religious people are the scum of the earth. Vain, stupid, cowardly, hateful, ignorant and proud. It's a shame we don't have a PM with the balls to put them in their place.
Mankind will not be free until the last king is strangled with the guts of the last priest

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by IQSRLOW » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:38 pm

So I gather you have no objection to polygamy then?

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by IQSRLOW » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:42 pm

What about objectaphilia?

For Monks benefit, what about Beastiality?
What if Monk wanted to marry Demi?

Would you deny them that right to live happily ever after?

User avatar
Swami Dring
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Swami Dring » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:51 pm

IQSRLOW wrote:So I gather you have no objection to polygamy then?
You gather correctly.
Mankind will not be free until the last king is strangled with the guts of the last priest

User avatar
Swami Dring
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Swami Dring » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:54 pm

IQSRLOW wrote:What about objectaphilia?
Sure, why not.
IQSRLOW wrote:For Monks benefit, what about Beastiality?
Yup
IQSRLOW wrote:What if Monk wanted to marry Demi?
That's ok
IQSRLOW wrote:Would you deny them that right to live happily ever after?
No
Last edited by Swami Dring on Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mankind will not be free until the last king is strangled with the guts of the last priest

User avatar
Swami Dring
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Swami Dring » Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:00 pm

People who get all wobbly about polygamy need to remember that our revered institution of marriage ends in divorce half the time. And that half of all married people have shagged someone behind their partner's back.

Given the stats, I see good reason to doubt that one-man-one-woman is the best system. Let's experiment.
Mankind will not be free until the last king is strangled with the guts of the last priest

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by IQSRLOW » Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:02 pm

For Monks benefit, what about Beastiality?

Yup
So it stands that you have no issue with consent....interesting

Where would you draw the line?

User avatar
Swami Dring
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Swami Dring » Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:55 pm

IQSRLOW wrote:
For Monks benefit, what about Beastiality?

Yup
So it stands that you have no issue with consent....interesting

Where would you draw the line?
My dog likes to root my leg just about every night after she has her dinner. She taps me on the ankle and will not stop until I present my leg. Ten seconds and it's all over. It's a victimless crime. I would not try to poke my noodle into her coz she might bite it. Plus it might look a bit weird. See? Beings who cohabit work out a system. If they're happy, they stay, if they're not, they leave. Religious folk who wring their hands about what might be happening in the bedroom are surplus to requirements.

I could marry my dog, our 'sex' life would continue as it is now, and the world would not stop turning.
Mankind will not be free until the last king is strangled with the guts of the last priest

Jovial Monk

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by Jovial Monk » Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:02 am

A sign of IQ's low level intellect is not being able to let go of a theme that was tired when it had been just invented. The screaming irony is that it is IQ that is into bestiality, or at least bestiality porn. He signed up to this bestiality porn website twice with my nick and email address. the second time the dweeb did this posted as Nicole from D&R, dunno what she did to piss him off :D
Last edited by Jovial Monk on Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Religion fellatrix

Post by boxy » Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:11 am

What about child marriages, Dringo?

But, on the original subject... I don't really understand why gays want to be able to marry (unless it's simply because they're rebelling against not being allowed), as long as they get all the legal advantages of marriage by being able to enter into civil unions. Marriage is a hetro thing...





... sort of like gold lame hotpants are a gay thing. They just don't look good on Joe Average, and public decency demands that he shouldn't be allowed to even think of wearing them in public :P
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 49 guests