Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Jovial Monk

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by Jovial Monk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:11 am

IQ is trolling.

Sappho

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by Sappho » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:47 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:
Sappho wrote:
Jovial Monk wrote:But he shouldn't be left to drive people off this or other boards.
For reasons beyond my comprehension, this forum has a long and illustrious history of slagging off at another's expense. It's a tradition about these parts that attracted the masters of verbal vitriol.

IQ is merely living that tradition.
IQ is trolling.
That's what I said.

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by IQSRLOW » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:48 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:IQ is trolling.
Monk is bawling

punk

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by punk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:13 pm

Sappho wrote:
No I don't think it is. A person should be able to express their hate thoughtfully. Vulgarity however does not by necessity express hate well thought. For example National Action/ The Third Reich express/ed hate of other races. IQ expresses vulgarity towards JM. The former groups seek/sort justification for their hatred of other races. IQ merely seeks to be as vulgar as possible. I am satisfied that the former groups genuinely hate many other races, based on their speeches. I am satisfied that IQ thoroughly enjoys toying with JM and causing him annoyance on this forum, based on his dramatic emoting.

Do you see the difference now? The former is thinking in words. The latter is emoting in words. Surely, you do not believe also that emotions expressed should have as free a reign as thoughts expressed?


u dont believe in freedom u leftard hypocrite,


http://polanimal.com/polanimal/viewtopi ... 160#p34160

Aussie is banned from my forum


ur like boxy, he discriminates like u do

boxy wrote:The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: http://www.ozpolitic.com/polanimal/view ... 467#p29467 .

Please stay on topic.
u said u were an advocate of free speech u lying fluffy bunny, u don't understand what free speech is. it means free speech for all, not free speech for some and not others

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by boxy » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:16 pm

AiA in Atlanta wrote:
boxy wrote: I wonder what his thoughts are on having someone follow him around, calling him a fluffy bunny at every opportunity, to express their disagreement with his writing? Is stalking a legitimate form of free speech?
Did you have anyone specific in mind when you wrote that? :)
Not really. It could apply to a great number of people throughout their PA "careers".
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Ned Kelly

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by Ned Kelly » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:33 pm

It could apply to a great number of people throughout their PA "careers".
So, list the 'great number.'

A 'great number' is quite a lot, yes? Heave ho, boxy, spill the beans on each and all of that 'great number.'

:)

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by boxy » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:40 pm

Too much effort for no return. Thanks for the interest though, Arsie.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Ned Kelly

Re: Phillip Pullman on Free Speech

Post by Ned Kelly » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:50 pm

boxy wrote:Too much effort for no return. Thanks for the interest though, Arsie.
You made the allegation. Back it up.

:D

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests