Scary anti-vax video
-
sprintcyclist
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
Now you've got me too scared to watch any of them !
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
-
Bobby
- Posts: 18278
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
Scary monsters keep me running.
OK - now for another scary video:
https://media.gab.com/system/media_atta ... 516570.mp4
-
Bobby
- Posts: 18278
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
-
Bobby
- Posts: 18278
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
ScoMo is fighting Covid on the beaches,
he's fighting it on the landing grounds,
he's fighting it in the air ,
he'll never surrender.
he's fighting it on the landing grounds,
he's fighting it in the air ,
he'll never surrender.
-
sprintcyclist
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/11 ... e-covid-19............. Pfizer and BioNTech have developed a similar mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 and also reported excellent results, with an efficacy of 95%, in the final analysis of their 45,000-person trial. In that study, which ended after 170 cases of COVID-19 were identified, only 10 severe cases occurred, and just one was in the vaccinated group. ................
Just 1 person who was vaccinated got covid
Against 170 who were NOT vaccinated.
Scary videos or scientific facts?
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
-
Bobby
- Posts: 18278
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
A scary site on Covid vax.
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/02/18/th ... jabs-safe/
The UK Government and Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have released the third report highlighting adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. Last week we dissected the Government’s second report which covered data inputted to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme from the 9th December 2020 through to the 31st January 2021 (see here). This week we’re going to dissect the third report so that you don’t have to, and we’re afraid the situation has got worse.
In last week’s report we told how the rate of adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines had increased from the rate seen in the Government’s first report (see our analysis of report one here) in which the rate equated to 1 in every 333 people suffering an adverse reaction. This had sadly increased to 1 in every 250 people in the Government’s second report. We’re pleased to confirm that the rate has not increased but sorry to say the current rate is still 1 in every 250 people who receive a dose of the Covid vaccine suffering from an adverse reaction.
Last week we concentrated on some of the major adverse reactions to the Oxford vaccine, these included 5 people going deaf, 40 suffering from tinnitus, 6 cases of cardiac arrest (heart attack), 8 cases of people going blind, 11 cases of brain damage, 40 people suffering seizures, and a total of 90 reported fatal outcomes (Deaths) as of the 31st January 2021.
This time we decided to take a look at some of the more serious adverse reactions to the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine (you can see the Government report here), and this is what we found…
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/02/18/th ... jabs-safe/
The UK Government and Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have released the third report highlighting adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. Last week we dissected the Government’s second report which covered data inputted to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme from the 9th December 2020 through to the 31st January 2021 (see here). This week we’re going to dissect the third report so that you don’t have to, and we’re afraid the situation has got worse.
In last week’s report we told how the rate of adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines had increased from the rate seen in the Government’s first report (see our analysis of report one here) in which the rate equated to 1 in every 333 people suffering an adverse reaction. This had sadly increased to 1 in every 250 people in the Government’s second report. We’re pleased to confirm that the rate has not increased but sorry to say the current rate is still 1 in every 250 people who receive a dose of the Covid vaccine suffering from an adverse reaction.
Last week we concentrated on some of the major adverse reactions to the Oxford vaccine, these included 5 people going deaf, 40 suffering from tinnitus, 6 cases of cardiac arrest (heart attack), 8 cases of people going blind, 11 cases of brain damage, 40 people suffering seizures, and a total of 90 reported fatal outcomes (Deaths) as of the 31st January 2021.
This time we decided to take a look at some of the more serious adverse reactions to the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine (you can see the Government report here), and this is what we found…
-
Bobby
- Posts: 18278
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
https://nationaladdictionnews.com/2021/ ... injection/
Update - she is now dead.
28-Year-old Wisconsin Healthcare Worker has Aneurysm – Brain Dead Five Days After Second Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injection.
She leaves behind a young son, siblings, friends and family members who have expressed shock on Facebook at her sudden death.
Her sister Jamie Lynn Cruz announced on Facebook, February 11, 2021, that the family was saying their goodbyes because there was no hope for her recovery.
Update - she is now dead.
28-Year-old Wisconsin Healthcare Worker has Aneurysm – Brain Dead Five Days After Second Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injection.
She leaves behind a young son, siblings, friends and family members who have expressed shock on Facebook at her sudden death.
Her sister Jamie Lynn Cruz announced on Facebook, February 11, 2021, that the family was saying their goodbyes because there was no hope for her recovery.
-
Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
I dont know if that means the injection was the cause at all!Bobby wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 9:14 amhttps://nationaladdictionnews.com/2021/ ... injection/
Update - she is now dead.
28-Year-old Wisconsin Healthcare Worker has Aneurysm – Brain Dead Five Days After Second Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injection.
She leaves behind a young son, siblings, friends and family members who have expressed shock on Facebook at her sudden death.
Her sister Jamie Lynn Cruz announced on Facebook, February 11, 2021, that the family was saying their goodbyes because there was no hope for her recovery.
My wife had an aneurysm and spent 11 days in intensive care, she also had no previous history of any problems.
Just awoke with a massive headache and luckily I took her to hospital outpatients, she had a stroke on the operating table!
-
Bobby
- Posts: 18278
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
Looks like it's a bio weapon:
German University Study: Most Likely COVID Came From Wuhan Lab Leak
World renowned scientist says artificial origin theory “must urgently become the subject of a public debate”
Published 15 hours ago
on 19 February, 2021
https://summit.news/2021/02/19/german-u ... -lab-leak/
A prominent German scientist with the University of Hamburg has released findings of a year long study that concludes the most likely cause of the coronavirus pandemic is a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The study, was overseen by Professor Dr. Roland Wiesendanger, a world renowned nanotechnology expert, and three-time awardee of the European Research Council Advanced Grant.
While his latest study has not been peer reviewed at this time, Wiesendanger has authored or co-authored more than 600 scientific publications as well as several books.
The University of Hamburg issued a press release detailing the findings of Wiesendanger’s study.
It concludes that that “both the number and quality of the circumstantial evidence point to a laboratory accident at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan as the cause of the current pandemic.”
The year long study was based on “scientific literature, articles in print and online media, and personal communication with international colleagues.”
Wiesendanger states that “It does not provide highly scientific evidence, but it does provide ample and serious circumstantial evidence”
The key points of the study are:
No intermediate host animal has been identified that could have facilitated the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 pathogens from bats to humans.
The SARS-CoV-2 viruses are surprisingly good at coupling to human cell receptors and penetrating human cells… which indicate a non-natural origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen.
A research group at the Wuhan City Virological Institute has been genetically manipulating coronaviruses for many years with the goal of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly to humans.
There are numerous direct references to a laboratory origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen.
German University Study: Most Likely COVID Came From Wuhan Lab Leak
World renowned scientist says artificial origin theory “must urgently become the subject of a public debate”
Published 15 hours ago
on 19 February, 2021
https://summit.news/2021/02/19/german-u ... -lab-leak/
A prominent German scientist with the University of Hamburg has released findings of a year long study that concludes the most likely cause of the coronavirus pandemic is a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The study, was overseen by Professor Dr. Roland Wiesendanger, a world renowned nanotechnology expert, and three-time awardee of the European Research Council Advanced Grant.
While his latest study has not been peer reviewed at this time, Wiesendanger has authored or co-authored more than 600 scientific publications as well as several books.
The University of Hamburg issued a press release detailing the findings of Wiesendanger’s study.
It concludes that that “both the number and quality of the circumstantial evidence point to a laboratory accident at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan as the cause of the current pandemic.”
The year long study was based on “scientific literature, articles in print and online media, and personal communication with international colleagues.”
Wiesendanger states that “It does not provide highly scientific evidence, but it does provide ample and serious circumstantial evidence”
The key points of the study are:
No intermediate host animal has been identified that could have facilitated the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 pathogens from bats to humans.
The SARS-CoV-2 viruses are surprisingly good at coupling to human cell receptors and penetrating human cells… which indicate a non-natural origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen.
A research group at the Wuhan City Virological Institute has been genetically manipulating coronaviruses for many years with the goal of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly to humans.
There are numerous direct references to a laboratory origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen.
-
sprintcyclist
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Scary anti-vax video
Vaccines are our best medicine. Polio, measels, whooping cough, tetanus, the flu, hepatitis B, hepatitus, rubella, Haemophilus influenzae type b), Pneumococcal Disease, Rotavirus, mumps, chicken pox, Diphtheria.
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests