kruddys resource tax

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by IQSRLOW » Sat May 01, 2010 11:45 pm

I see that you only want simple questions so you can provide your simple answers. Sorry to disappoint.
Anyhoo, back to a real question...
So increasing the price of locally produced goods in comparison to imported products is ta silly tangent?

I suggest you haven't thought through your silly idea and are struggling to justify it. Feel free to continue to embarrass yourself

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by freediver » Sun May 02, 2010 8:03 am

NO IQ, it is not a silly tangent. You brought it up. I responded to it. You spent another page complaining about the complexity of my answer. That was the silly tangent. Your original claim, and the one above, is wrong for a very simple reason, so it only needs a very simple response. You can either keep discussing it, or discuss whether you can discuss it. Your choice.

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by IQSRLOW » Sun May 02, 2010 10:42 am

You are a fuckwit who obviously doesn't have the answer to a simple question raised by your proposed love of taxing the fuck out of people for no gain while destroying local industry.

When confronted, the best you can come up with is " not neccessarily"
Hahahahahahaha

dickhead

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by freediver » Sun May 02, 2010 1:32 pm

I came up with an answer. "You are wrong"

There is a difference between not giving an answer, and giving an answer you don't like. It would help if you stopped pretending it is the same thing. That's why we haven't progressed any further than on the first page of this thread.

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by IQSRLOW » Sun May 02, 2010 1:56 pm

Nope. Your inability to answer vindicates my stance and confirms that you are indeed a fuckwit with simple answers to complex issues.

You display the same trait with marine park issues.

Complexity is just not your forte, is it... :lol:

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by freediver » Sun May 02, 2010 1:58 pm

No matter how complicated you try to make it, you are still wrong.

This is only so simple because you are incapable of moving on without getting the answer you want.

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by IQSRLOW » Sun May 02, 2010 2:01 pm

No matter how simple you are, you are still wrong

You are incapable of giving any answer because it would expose you for
a) Being wrong and
b) Being a fuckwit

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by freediver » Sun May 02, 2010 2:15 pm

If I haven't even given you an answer, how could it be wrong?

I will give it to you agaion, one last time. You use the income generated to lower other taxes. Some prices go up, some go down. This is the reality, rather than your simpleton "everything goes up in price" criticism.

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by IQSRLOW » Sun May 02, 2010 2:18 pm

Once again you fail to address the premise with your simpleton "Some prices go up, some go down."

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: kruddys resource tax

Post by freediver » Sun May 02, 2010 2:22 pm

What am I failing to address? Perhaps you should restate it instead of complaining for two pages that I didn't answer it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests