Constitution

This folder contains Archived threads.
Post Reply
Maxine

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Maxine » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:27 am

Because Mr Peedrinker, you only want this vote held so people are no longer able to say they did not sign onto your Constitution, isn't that so? So few people around a Petition to vote on another change to the Constitution will never succeed.

Senexx

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Senexx » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:46 pm

Yes (for now)

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by freediver » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:14 pm

you only want this vote held so people are no longer able to say they did not sign onto your Constitution
I have many reasons. That is not one of them. Speak for yourself.
So few people around a Petition to vote on another change to the Constitution will never succeed.
This is a vote (referendum) not a petition.

Ned Kelly

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Ned Kelly » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:23 pm

Ned Kelly wrote:freeloader, can you help us out here? Can you lead us to the Thread where this Board voted to accept any Constitution? There's a good chap. You are here to 'serve,' yes?
*Cough*

Mr. Freeloader, your answer? I am your master. You must serve..........the Members.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by freediver » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:47 pm

I am not here to serve you Aussie.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11787
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Super Nova » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:06 am

my vote = YES
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Yogi

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Yogi » Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:36 pm

Before this vote is closed off, boxy, seeing as how freeloader considers himself above service to the Members, can you lead us to where this Forum voted to accept the 'current' Constitution?

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by freediver » Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:04 pm

Are you Aussie also?

Big Bird

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Big Bird » Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:32 pm

Yogi wrote:Before this vote is closed off, boxy, seeing as how freeloader considers himself above service to the Members, can you lead us to where this Forum voted to accept the 'current' Constitution?
*Bump* for Boxy.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by boxy » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:30 pm

My vote is yes.
Yogi wrote:Before this vote is closed off, boxy, seeing as how freeloader considers himself above service to the Members, can you lead us to where this Forum voted to accept the 'current' Constitution?
They voted with their presence. Freediver offered to provide this board for our use, free of charge, and we accepted it, with his constitution in place. We're always free to just walk away, but given that freediver is open to us creating our own rules, PA doesn't see any real need to move on, or even put much effort into changing the constitution, because, frankly, it just doesn't affect the way well intentioned posters post, at all. We talk our shit, and the mods stay out of it, unless posters actively go looking to get moderated. It's the PA way.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests