Why would anyone trust Labor’s leader Albanese?
AMM 26.03.20.
Labor's AnAl saving Australia from Labor Socialism.
Labor’s Anthony Albanese stood in Parliament last week with muted voice and a solemn, sad-sack visage pledging his bi-partisan union with government regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.
Albo might have better served himself and all involved had he executed a practice quarantine, maybe three or four months to stay out of the way.
Perhaps Labor’s mob have yet to recognise that poor-old Albo is sleepwalking them over the cliff.
The Labor Party has broken decisively from policy bipartisanship on the fight against COVID-19.
Its attack on Wednesday was comprehensive, specific and personal.
Sensing mounting concern about Scott Morrison’s stance, Labor has dissented from the government and its medical advisers.
Coronavirus: Anthony Albanese in bed with Boris Johnson as games begin
Source: Paul Kelly. News Corp
Labor leader Anthony Albanese and his senior colleagues rejected Morrison’s core strategy — fighting two crises, health and economic, together. Albanese repudiated this as a “false distinction”, saying Labor saw health as the first priority followed by the economy “in that order”.
He rejected the Morrison method of daily updates as “no good” for certainty and confidence. Aware that tougher measures are coming, Albanese called for “stricter shutdowns” of the economy. He accused Morrison of playing politics, confusing the public and seeking “to hector people and blame people”.
Criticising the centrepiece of the second fiscal package, he endorsed the principle of “wages being paid” as adopted by Tory PM Boris Johnson.
The differences go to fundamentals. Labor now seeks growing product distinction between itself and the government as the infections spread. The split over the health strategy, messages and economic measures sets up a longer-run conflict guaranteed to dominate this entire parliamentary term.
In his media conferences on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, Morrison was emphatic about his strategy. In implementing his non-essential economic shutdown, Morrison referred to a “twin crisis, a crisis on a health front which is also causing a crisis in the economy. And both of them can be as equally as deadly”.
“My priority is to protect Australian lives and to protect their livelihoods,” he said.
He was reluctant to close down businesses when “there’s no medical advice” to this effect. While moving into shutdown mode, he said it was important the economy continued “to operate and function as much as possible”.
Labor health spokesman Chris Bowen said: “I see people saying, well, the government’s got to balance the economy against health. No. I completely reject that. The best economic plan for the country is to beat this virus quickly.”
While Labor is pushing hard for more urgent action, it avoids saying exactly what parts of the economy it would leave open.
The constant government stance based on medical advice is there is no quick fix.
In his Tuesday night comments, Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy said if the public practised social distancing and followed Morrison’s instructions, “that will achieve the outcomes that we want” — short of “destroying life as we know it”.
With confusion about schools, long queues at Centrelink offices, the Ruby Princess fiasco and Premier Daniel Andrews announcing that Victoria was heading to stage three shutdowns, Albanese said: “They (people) are confused that each day the government seems to be making different announcements about the way they should act.”
He said, incredibly, the government had to ensure there was not a tension “between dealing with the health issues and dealing with the economic issues”.
That remark is nothing but nonsense. Albanese is playing a double game — politics dictated he must vote for the government’s bills this week and politics now dictates he must signal his fundamental differences with Morrison’s strategy.
Standing next to Albanese, SDA national secretary Gerard Dwyer called on the government to provide a direct wage subsidy, saying business and unions wanted it, which is similar to British government actions. Morrison and Josh Frydenberg have rejected this, emphasising that Treasury advised against it.
Albanese’s comments were riddled with contradictions. He attacked Morrison, saying he must follow advice when the government’s entire response to the crisis has been based upon the medical advice, Treasury advice and national cabinet deliberations. If the government has blundered, it is because it followed medical advice, not ignored it.
On the economy, Albanese said Morrison needed to take advice in terms of shutdowns as well as providing income support.
From whom should Morrison seek advice? It seems to be Boris Johnson.
Leftist media saturates the news. Fight back. Send articles to your friends, politicians, local media, and facebook.
https://morningmail.org/why-would-anyon ... ore-114244
Labor's AnAl is helping ScoMo to win the next election
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:56 am
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Labor's AnAl is helping ScoMo to win the next election
In his favour he's helping to pass the relief stimulus packages that ScoMo has put forward so he deserves kudos there. Unlike the Democrats in the US who are asking for everything under the sun to be added and holding it all up.
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Labor's AnAl is helping ScoMo to win the next election
Yes, my understanding is both parties are cooperating.Black Orchid wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:31 pmIn his favour he's helping to pass the relief stimulus packages that ScoMo has put forward so he deserves kudos there. Unlike the Democrats in the US who are asking for everything under the sun to be added and holding it all up.
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests