The UN to ban criticism

[sprintcyclist]

............ U.N. Global Migration Pact would make a criminal offense for citizens and media outlets to criticize mass immigration.
Please watch and share this video.
This is dire warning for the future of Europe, America, and Australia.
Just recently Australia joined a growing number of countries that have decided not to sign the UN migration pact including the United States, Israel, Hungary, Croatia, Poland and Austria.
The UN is losing its ability to force Western countries to accept millions of refugees and migrants from all over the Middle East, Asia and Africa and provide them with free housing, food, money, health insurance and welfare benefits. ................

http://www.freepressfront.com/2018/12/u ... OrGLDwJZVo

[The4thEstate]

Actually, I support the UN migration pact.

Because, y'know, sometimes you look around your bathroom and realize you're out of toilet paper ...

[brian ross]

Might be better to consult something other than Right-Wing Conspiranut website, Sprint...

Critics say the agreement makes criticism of migration illegal—it doesn’t

Because the agreement isn’t legally binding, it doesn’t force member states to do anything, but some critics have said it sets the precedent for member states to take certain actions.

One objection aired by Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff is that the agreement sets the precedent for countries to enact law that makes: “criticism of migration … a criminal offense.”

This is incorrect. The document asks nations to “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination…against all migrants.” And any country that took this further and tried to criminalise criticism of migration would likely be breaching human rights legislation.

Making sure migrants aren’t discriminated against is a very different thing to asking states to criminalise criticism of migration. The document explicitly says: “We also commit to protect freedom of expression.”

Professor Costello also told us: “Any government that decided to meet the commitment to tackle discrimination and xenophobia by censorship would in likelihood be breaching its international human rights obligations, in particular the right to freedom of expression.”

Mr de Graaff also said the compact means: “media outlets…that give room to criticism of migration can be shut down.”

That’s also not correct. The compact asks signatories to commit to “stopping allocation of public funding or material supports to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants.”

In both these cases the phrasing is crucial. The UN wants signatories to ensure migrants aren’t discriminated against, not to outlaw criticism of migration.

It details measures to stop crimes against people, not criticism of a policy. However it does say signatories should: “Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets … including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, in full respect for the freedom of the media”

[Source]

[Valkie]

The UN is irrelevant

Full of muzzos and muzzo sympathisers, who I suspect are marriage rape pedophiles in waiting.

They think they are better than western society.

But here is a little prophesy for you.

Should the CULT of DEATH take over the world.

There will be a regression back to the most primitive and backward society known on earth.

There will be no more advances in science, medicine or humanity

The earth will be reduced to a series of Murderious attacked on one group by another.

Continual and perpetual war, in a century or two, there will be nothing worthwhile on earth.

And when that CULT member finally works out how the shoot off the missile, it will be the final chapter in humanity.

The CULT of DEATH the sword of Damocles hanging over humanities head.