Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18265
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by Bobby » Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:20 pm

What do you have to do to get jail these days?


Image
Thug and woman beater -James Haberfield .

A young man who placed a female paramedic in a headlock and punched her in the face has been spared jail for a second time.

James Haberfield avoided a mandatory prison term for the drug fuelled attack.

Watch the video:

https://twitter.com/9NewsAUS/status/1206470686840999936




https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-16/ ... d/11802038
A judge has upheld a decision not to jail a Melbourne man who attacked two Victorian paramedics while in a "psychotic state" after taking a cocktail of drugs at a festival.
Key points:

County Court Judge Michael Tinney found James Haberfield's mental impairment at the time of the crime was linked to his schizophrenia
He extended Haberfield's treatment, monitoring and corrections orders for a further four months
The case is the first test of laws designed to require jail sentences for people who attack paramedics

James Haberfield, 22, was sentenced to an 18-month community corrections order in August,
thereby avoiding a minimum six-month jail term imposed under recently introduced laws for those who attack emergency workers.
Prosecutors appealed the decision on the grounds that "it was not open to the magistrate to impose any sentence other than a custodial sentence" as required under the Sentencing Act.

Today, County Court Judge Michael Tinney refused to jail Haberfield, finding the new laws still provided for special reasons which could act as exception.

"In truth, it is not a mandatory sentencing provision," Judge Tinney said of the new legislation.

The judge said the first special reason was Haberfield's mental impairment at the time of the offence, which he found was not solely due to his drug-taking but was also linked to underlying schizophrenia.

The second special reason was what Judge Tinney described as the "extraordinary burden" of a jail term, saying Haberfield was a "deeply disturbed and vulnerable first offender" who would be "likely to be greatly damaged in adult prison".

The case was the first test of the legislative changes, which came into effect in October 2018.

Judge Tinney extended Haberfield's original mandatory treatment, monitoring and community corrections orders for an additional four months.

During sentencing, Judge Tinney told Haberfield he had avoided jail "by the skin of your teeth".

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18265
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by Bobby » Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:58 pm

What will the judge say if he gets back on the drugs
and assaults or kills someone else?

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by The Reboot » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:27 pm

Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:20 pm
The second special reason was what Judge Tinney described as the "extraordinary burden" of a jail term, saying Haberfield was a "deeply disturbed and vulnerable first offender" who would be "likely to be greatly damaged in adult prison".
Which is exactly what the stupid little prick deserves.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18265
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by Bobby » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:29 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:27 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:20 pm
The second special reason was what Judge Tinney described as the "extraordinary burden" of a jail term, saying Haberfield was a "deeply disturbed and vulnerable first offender" who would be "likely to be greatly damaged in adult prison".
Which is exactly what the stupid little prick deserves.

Shouldn't he be locked up for the safety of the community?

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by The Reboot » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:31 pm

Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:29 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:27 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:20 pm
The second special reason was what Judge Tinney described as the "extraordinary burden" of a jail term, saying Haberfield was a "deeply disturbed and vulnerable first offender" who would be "likely to be greatly damaged in adult prison".
Which is exactly what the stupid little prick deserves.

Shouldn't he be locked up for the safety of the community?
I'd say yes, but jails are like hotels now.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18265
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by Bobby » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:32 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:31 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:29 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:27 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:20 pm
The second special reason was what Judge Tinney described as the "extraordinary burden" of a jail term, saying Haberfield was a "deeply disturbed and vulnerable first offender" who would be "likely to be greatly damaged in adult prison".
Which is exactly what the stupid little prick deserves.

Shouldn't he be locked up for the safety of the community?
I'd say yes, but jails are like hotels now.

He needs hard labor - breaking rocks.

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by The Reboot » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:38 pm

Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:32 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:31 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:29 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:27 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:20 pm
The second special reason was what Judge Tinney described as the "extraordinary burden" of a jail term, saying Haberfield was a "deeply disturbed and vulnerable first offender" who would be "likely to be greatly damaged in adult prison".
Which is exactly what the stupid little prick deserves.

Shouldn't he be locked up for the safety of the community?
I'd say yes, but jails are like hotels now.

He needs hard labor - breaking rocks.
Not a hanging? Have you mellowed out since I was last here? :rofl

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18265
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by Bobby » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:46 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:38 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:32 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:31 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:29 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:27 pm


Which is exactly what the stupid little prick deserves.

Shouldn't he be locked up for the safety of the community?
I'd say yes, but jails are like hotels now.

He needs hard labor - breaking rocks.
Not a hanging? Have you mellowed out since I was last here? :rofl

Hanging only for:
murder,
rape,
pedophilia,
terrorism &
enormous theft,

and even then only in the worst cases.

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by The Reboot » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:48 pm

Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:46 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:38 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:32 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:31 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:29 pm



Shouldn't he be locked up for the safety of the community?
I'd say yes, but jails are like hotels now.

He needs hard labor - breaking rocks.
Not a hanging? Have you mellowed out since I was last here? :rofl

Hanging only for:
murder,
rape,
pedophilia,
terrorism &
enormous theft,

and even then only in the worst cases.
What about two men making sweet love?

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18265
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Female paramedic assaulted - no jail time!

Post by Bobby » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:55 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:48 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:46 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:38 pm
Bobby wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:32 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:31 pm


I'd say yes, but jails are like hotels now.

He needs hard labor - breaking rocks.
Not a hanging? Have you mellowed out since I was last here? :rofl

Hanging only for:
murder,
rape,
pedophilia,
terrorism &
enormous theft,

and even then only in the worst cases.
What about two men making sweet love?

That could be up to the discretion of the judge.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests