Diversity is strength is the law.

[Nicole]

Not yet.

Have a listen Black Orchid. It’s very good, in a sick, scary kind of way.

[Bobby]

Blair wrote this today on another website:

Nov 14, 2019, 19:29 ·

Quick update after today:

>No, I’m not in prison as some people are claiming.

>Today the final submissions on the potential invalidity of the law I’ve been charged with were made.

>The prosecution claimed that finding me guilty and the law valid would not burden the freedom of political communication but enhance it, because it would “ensure nobody was excluded from political communication on the basis of religious belief” –As though including Muslims who behead people based on religious belief is somehow beneficial to political communication in Australia.

>The Attorney General’s office backed up the prosecutor on everything and together with the state prosecution team took five hours to make their submissions against my arguments today.

>My barrister John Bolton argued that even if the law of “intent to incite severe ridicule” was found to be a valid one, it should be narrowly defined so that it cannot be used on people engaged in political activism and political communication. The prosecution team and the Attorney General’s office didn’t seem to be ready for that submission, had no answer but did not oppose my barrister on that one.

>The Judge indicated that It could be weeks before he makes his final decision.

I had a great and humbling amount of support during the trial this week, massive Thankyou to everybody who has and still supports me after all this time.
I intend to provide more information on the trial and explain everything in greater detail in a video I’ll make in the next couple of days.

[Valkie]

Not yet.

I wouldn't bother. He is a convicted criminal.

Listen to what he sayeth for thou shall have much to learn.

Jesus was also a criminal.

That don't matter to bwyannnnnnnnn
bwyannnnnnnnn
He worships the sociopath, cowardly, self confessed pedophile, nutcase Muhammid the mad.

[Nom De Plume]

That was very interesting Bob.
I also found what Bogan had to say spot on. We are in the midst of a civilizational demise of the kind experienced in 1920s.

[Bobby]

That was very interesting Bob.
I also found what Bogan had to say spot on. We are in the midst of a civilizational demise of the kind experienced in 1920s.

Labor & Liberal just give the illusion of choice -
we actually live in a one party communist state.

[Black Orchid]

I am glad I am nearly dead, because all I can see about western civilisation is complete civilisational collapse, and sometime soon. History shows how civilisations fall very quickly. Nobody predicted the fall of the USSR before it suddenly happened. And I think that western civilisation is going to go the same way. When it happens, it will come suddenly and unexpectantly.

I have lived through the most interesting and fascinating time of human history, when immense technological changes coincided with an exponentially increasing human population. In my lifetime, the human population of Earth has nearly tripled. Extrapolate forward and it simply can not go on. Perhaps some kind superbug will thin us out? The only other alternatives are going to be the other traditional population reducers, starvation and war.

Whereas Brian Ross froths at the mouth at the idea of Donald Trump being the President of the USA, to my mind all Trump is doing is propping up the US for a few more years until, like the USSR, Spain, Great Britain, and Rome before it, it is going to go bankrupt. Europe itself is heading towards civil war. But Brian is like a Titanic survivor, busily punching holes in his own lifeboat, rejoicing at the sinking of his own liner, and trying to get ship's captain arrested for trying to save the ship.

The great human experiment of democracy and free markets is over, and it failed. It failed because democracy can be corrupted by a myriad of powerful vested interests, and free markets can never remain free. Governments will always try to meddle in the markets, sometimes for very good and valid reasons, but most times for political gain. And when they meddle for political gain, the process snowballs until cronyism, special favours, and money displace democracy as the real sources of power. That is where we are today.

My advice to the younger generation is to start buying gold. In a world where "money" today consists of simply waving your Iphone at a terminal, this is a concept guaranteed to destroy any idea as to what money really represents. It is a concept guaranteed to create bankruptcy, and it is almost emblematic of a society where many people think that the government's coffers are bottomless. Sooner or later, this abstract and bizarre concept is going to face a reality check.

The only satisfying factor in all of this, is that when the ship finally sinks, Brian Ross and his clones will go down with it.

Great post Bogan.

[Bobby]

Blair Cottrell wrote today:

Nov 15, 2019, 15:57 ·

Throughout my trial this week it was made clear that the government and some judges do not consider the Australian implied right to freedom of speech to be an individual right.
The implied right is according to judges such as Justice Coleman intended to protect “general political communication” by restricting legislation which might “generally burden” communication of a political nature.

The state prosecutor and the Attorney General’s office in my case has argued that convicting me as an individual with a criminal offence based on what they consider to be vilifying conduct, speech or intent does not conflict with the implied right to free speech in Australia, because it has no effect on political communication “generally”. They’ve argued that successfully convicting me may “enhance the implied right to freedom of speech” by reducing “offensive and intimidating” speech.

What this implies is any individual in Australia can legally be censored or charged with a criminal offence for something he or she has said, so long as political communication “as a whole” is proven not to be affected much
.
The state is essentially arguing here that media corporations and “offical committees” ought to be protected with the implied right to free speech, but not individuals or regular people.

I was not permitted to present any evidence in this part of the trial so was not able to bring to the judge’s attention that I was censored for no clear reason, from all major social media platforms, losing the ability to communicate with hundreds of thousands of followers after having been charged with the offence of “intent to incite ridicule of Muslims”.
The reason I was not permitted to point this out is because it was decided by the court that evidence presented by individuals should not be considered, since individuals cannot speak or present any legitimate evidence for how political communication “as a whole” might have been effected by any law, they can only present their own individual experiences which were not considered relevant.

The Attorney General’s barrister actually likened hearing any evidence I would give as “being the same as taking some random person off of the street and asking him his opinion.”

I don’t think random people on the street have established platforms from which they’ve communicated political perspectives with hundreds of thousands of interested members of the public, then lost those platforms overnight as part of a censorship campaign like I did, but the judge ended up not allowing me to speak on that subject nonetheless, he instead decided to hear from a university social scientist on “why censorship of bigots is good.”

This is important information for people not just in Australia but all around the world to understand and share. Government and media bureaucrats connected to global networks of influence want free speech laws to apply to them but not to the public.

“Free speech for us but not for the people” is their attitude.

[Nom De Plume]

That was very interesting Bob.
I also found what Bogan had to say spot on. We are in the midst of a civilizational demise of the kind experienced in 1920s.

Labor & Liberal just give the illusion of choice -
we actually live in a one party communist state.

Capitalist communism eh?
Like China?

[Valkie]

The only satisfying factor in all of this, is that when the ship finally sinks, Brian Ross and his clones will go down with it.

Yes but will they realise in the end, that it were they, and those like them, that brought the end on.

Or will they in their stupidity continue with their denial unto the end?

But then again, perhaps they will join with their new masters.
New masters who they dare not contradict or question....ever.

Coward's, morons, stupid people masquerading as altruistic but who are really nothing but sycophantic imbicils who have no idea of the fire they are playing with.

[Nom De Plume]

The only satisfying factor in all of this, is that when the ship finally sinks, Brian Ross and his clones will go down with it.

Yes but will they realise in the end, that it were they, and those like them, that brought the end on.

Or will they in their stupidity continue with their denial unto the end?

But then again, perhaps they will join with their new masters.
New masters who they dare not contradict or question....ever.

Coward's, morons, stupid people masquerading as altruistic but who are really nothing but sycophantic imbicils who have no idea of the fire they are playing with.

Their is nothing altruistic about Bwian!