Surprising coming from Obama but, like Pelosi, perhaps he too can see that they have gone way too far to the left and is evident in their current candidates who are just horrible, unelectable and crazy.The most sensible and important thing anyone on the progressive side of politics has said in a long while was Barack Obama’s invocation against the judgmental and doctrinaire rhetoric of modern-day activists.
In a terrific interview last month, the two-term former president took aim at what he described as the “call-out culture” that has infected progressive discourse, where Left-wingers — especially on social media — are quick to throw around tags of racism, homophobia and general bigotry towards those with whom they disagree.
Specifically, Obama sought to demolish the concept of “wokeness”, the state of being so politically enlightened that you regard all others with contempt, if not hatred.
“This idea of purity and you’re never compromised and you’re always politically ‘woke’ and all that stuff,” he said, “You should get over that quickly.”
“The world is messy; there are ambiguities. People who do really good stuff have flaws. People who you are fighting may love their kids and share certain things with you.”
Being 'Woke'
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25701
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Being 'Woke'
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25701
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Being 'Woke'
Firewall sorry.Obama’s words have as much relevance in Australia as they do in the US, where the binary nature of modern debate now seeks to divide the world into two irreconcilable camps – the wholly enlightened versus the irretrievably prejudiced.
I have no doubt this is one of the key reasons Labor’s vote has collapsed among working-class people, as the perception exists — rightly or wrongly — that the party is obsessed with politically-correct undergraduate issues that have no bearing on the day-to-day lives of blue-collar folks. We saw Exhibit A this week for exactly what Obama was talking about involving, of all things, a horse race. The victory of Vow and Declare in Tuesday’s Melbourne Cup was regarded by many as an Australian success story in that a plucky nag with humble owners beat a field dominated by international horses owned by oil barons and European multi-millionaires.
ABC journalist Osman Faruqi saw it differently. He saw something sinister and dark in the celebration of this Australian victory.
“On Sunrise this morning, one of the guests literally said the Melbourne Cup result was good because the winning horse ‘grew here, not flew here’,” he wrote on Twitter.
“The culture is so racism-poisoned that we’re being xenophobic about racehorses.”
This hilariously stupid observation sought to conflate post-September 11 sentiment on everything from the Cronulla riots to the Tampa and “Children Overboard” affair into the wholly innocuous celebration of an unexpected result in a horse race.
It is the precise brand of nonsense identified by Obama – and it’s killing the Left.
Of the many rejoinders to Faruqi’s tweet, none were stronger, blunter or more sweetly executed than that penned by Martin Pakula, who happens to be a member of Labor’s Right faction and Racing Minister in the Victorian Labor Government.
“Being happy that a local horse beat the overseas horses is apparently racist now,” Pakula wrote. “We have actually gone through the looking glass, jumped the shark and entered the twilight zone.”
Not so, replied Faruqi, who fired back on Twitter, saying the term “we grew here, you flew here” was “a notorious racial slur popularised in one of the nation’s worst modern race riots”. (As an aside, I like the use of the words “one of the worst” in Faruqi’s reply, as it suggests there have been heaps of other modern race riots in Australia, all of them presumably covered up by the authorities.)
This Twitter exchange continued on for most of Wednesday, enlightening no one, infuriating many and (to Obama’s point) giving the supporters of Faruqi a chance to strut their “wokeness” by denouncing Pakula as an apologist for bigots, bogans and boors.
You could not find a better example of the fruitlessly unshiftable nature of modern discourse. Despite his best efforts, it was impossible for Pakula to make his point, as he was resolutely denounced as a friend of the prejudiced for refusing to agree with this ABC poseur.
People such as Osman Faruqi need to recognise a simple truth: With their smug purity and their generalised slurs against normal folks who are simply having a good time, they do more to drive people toward the conservative side of politics than a year’s worth of Andrew Bolt columns.
Consider the two most dramatic protests in Australia during the past 12 months – the Extinction Rebellion protests demanding action on climate change and the Dominion protests against animal cruelty.
Both are stellar examples of how the hysterical and militant tactics of the politically obsessed can turn normal people off an otherwise-palatable political cause.
One of the most depressing scenes in Melbourne last week outside that mining conference saw an innocent passer-by bailed up and berated simply because he was wearing a suit.
He wasn’t even attending the conference, he was walking past, but he got a gob full anyway, adorned as he was in the official uniform of the ruling class, even though he may have been a schoolteacher, a lay priest, even a well-dressed anarchist.
The loony left at its absolute worst. People aren't going to put up with this lunacy for much longer. I have been saying this forever that this approach only serves to drive people away.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18294
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Being 'Woke'
Because there's no racism, homophobia and general bigotry on Polanimal -
it won't affect us.
it won't affect us.
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests