Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6275
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by Redneck » Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:42 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:39 pm
billy the kid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:35 pm
Couldn't run a game of marbles....liberals or labor.....
On that we agree!
Redneck wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:37 pm
I will start saying prayers again! :scare
What are you praying for Red? :pope
World peace!

User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6275
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by Redneck » Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:50 pm

How many aircraft carriers do we have BO ???
Author : Richard Menhinick had an extensive career in the Royal Australian Navy, including commands at sea, ashore and on operations. He has also worked in strategic analysis and policy formulation.

"The navy of today and tomorrow is the same size in a ship sense as it was in 1976 when I joined, with about a dozen destroyers and frigates. However, strategically we’re significantly less effective vis-à-vis the region. The minister’s introduction to the 2016 defence white paper states that it ‘sets out the most ambitious plan to regenerate the Royal Australian Navy since the Second World War’. That sounds impressive, but it’s essentially misleading—in essence, we’re doing ship replacement. The navy remains too small and it’s a self-defence force, with limited power projection or ability to conduct sea control at distance.

We should be talking to the Australian public about strategic truths in a language they understand, explaining to them the new reality. To have self-reliance and self-help in this era requires a much larger, more potent navy. Fixed-wing, strike-capable aircraft carriers are required to project maritime air power via the short take-off, vertical landing version of the joint strike fighter. And we need perhaps twice the number of destroyers and frigates, so that we can really carry out aggressive operations against numerically larger air, surface and submarine threats, to dominate, deter and if necessary defeat. The submarines we’re getting are potentially good, but that’s an isolated area of improvement."
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/cleve ... tent-navy/

User avatar
billy the kid
Posts: 5814
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by billy the kid » Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:55 pm

theconversation.com/security-in-doubt-as-australias-aging-oil-refineries-shut-down-5553

A little history on the topic....
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by brian ross » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:00 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:39 pm
billy the kid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:35 pm
Couldn't run a game of marbles....liberals or labor.....
On that we agree!
Interesting. Didn't you suggest we should vote the Tories back in at the last election, Black Orchid? Looks to me that you've got the Government you deserved... :lol:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25688
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:02 pm

Redneck wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:50 pm
How many aircraft carriers do we have BO ???
Author : Richard Menhinick had an extensive career in the Royal Australian Navy, including commands at sea, ashore and on operations. He has also worked in strategic analysis and policy formulation.

"The navy of today and tomorrow is the same size in a ship sense as it was in 1976 when I joined, with about a dozen destroyers and frigates. However, strategically we’re significantly less effective vis-à-vis the region. The minister’s introduction to the 2016 defence white paper states that it ‘sets out the most ambitious plan to regenerate the Royal Australian Navy since the Second World War’. That sounds impressive, but it’s essentially misleading—in essence, we’re doing ship replacement. The navy remains too small and it’s a self-defence force, with limited power projection or ability to conduct sea control at distance.

We should be talking to the Australian public about strategic truths in a language they understand, explaining to them the new reality. To have self-reliance and self-help in this era requires a much larger, more potent navy. Fixed-wing, strike-capable aircraft carriers are required to project maritime air power via the short take-off, vertical landing version of the joint strike fighter. And we need perhaps twice the number of destroyers and frigates, so that we can really carry out aggressive operations against numerically larger air, surface and submarine threats, to dominate, deter and if necessary defeat. The submarines we’re getting are potentially good, but that’s an isolated area of improvement."
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/cleve ... tent-navy/
Show me where we are being requested to send aircraft carriers to the Strait of Hormuz?

User avatar
billy the kid
Posts: 5814
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by billy the kid » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:03 pm

Redneck wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:50 pm
How many aircraft carriers do we have BO ???
Author : Richard Menhinick had an extensive career in the Royal Australian Navy, including commands at sea, ashore and on operations. He has also worked in strategic analysis and policy formulation.

"The navy of today and tomorrow is the same size in a ship sense as it was in 1976 when I joined, with about a dozen destroyers and frigates. However, strategically we’re significantly less effective vis-à-vis the region. The minister’s introduction to the 2016 defence white paper states that it ‘sets out the most ambitious plan to regenerate the Royal Australian Navy since the Second World War’. That sounds impressive, but it’s essentially misleading—in essence, we’re doing ship replacement. The navy remains too small and it’s a self-defence force, with limited power projection or ability to conduct sea control at distance.

We should be talking to the Australian public about strategic truths in a language they understand, explaining to them the new reality. To have self-reliance and self-help in this era requires a much larger, more potent navy. Fixed-wing, strike-capable aircraft carriers are required to project maritime air power via the short take-off, vertical landing version of the joint strike fighter. And we need perhaps twice the number of destroyers and frigates, so that we can really carry out aggressive operations against numerically larger air, surface and submarine threats, to dominate, deter and if necessary defeat. The submarines we’re getting are potentially good, but that’s an isolated area of improvement."
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/cleve ... tent-navy/
Well, we've got 72 US castoff F35s that need a paint job every time they fly, and cant fly in a storm...
...and we are soon to get (30 years) 12 submarines designed in France...maybe built in.....wait for it....
South Australia.....so maybe when the wars over...we might have an aircraft carrier built somewhere...Spain comes to mind.....
Makes one wonder who are the political imbeciles running our military....I can hear someone yelling......Yosemite Sam.... :rofl
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25688
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:04 pm

brian ross wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:00 pm
Black Orchid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:39 pm
billy the kid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:35 pm
Couldn't run a game of marbles....liberals or labor.....
On that we agree!
Interesting. Didn't you suggest we should vote the Tories back in at the last election, Black Orchid? Looks to me that you've got the Government you deserved... :lol:
I never suggested any such thing. I didn't even vote for them myself you scramble headed twat. Take your medication.

User avatar
billy the kid
Posts: 5814
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by billy the kid » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:08 pm

Within 21 minutes of Black Orchid posting, the resident moron crawls out from under his rock...…
And...instead of saying something constructive on the topic...posts like the troll he is......nothing changes..... :rofl
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...

User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6275
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by Redneck » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:13 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:02 pm
Redneck wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:50 pm
How many aircraft carriers do we have BO ???
Author : Richard Menhinick had an extensive career in the Royal Australian Navy, including commands at sea, ashore and on operations. He has also worked in strategic analysis and policy formulation.

"The navy of today and tomorrow is the same size in a ship sense as it was in 1976 when I joined, with about a dozen destroyers and frigates. However, strategically we’re significantly less effective vis-à-vis the region. The minister’s introduction to the 2016 defence white paper states that it ‘sets out the most ambitious plan to regenerate the Royal Australian Navy since the Second World War’. That sounds impressive, but it’s essentially misleading—in essence, we’re doing ship replacement. The navy remains too small and it’s a self-defence force, with limited power projection or ability to conduct sea control at distance.

We should be talking to the Australian public about strategic truths in a language they understand, explaining to them the new reality. To have self-reliance and self-help in this era requires a much larger, more potent navy. Fixed-wing, strike-capable aircraft carriers are required to project maritime air power via the short take-off, vertical landing version of the joint strike fighter. And we need perhaps twice the number of destroyers and frigates, so that we can really carry out aggressive operations against numerically larger air, surface and submarine threats, to dominate, deter and if necessary defeat. The submarines we’re getting are potentially good, but that’s an isolated area of improvement."
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/cleve ... tent-navy/
Show me where we are being requested to send aircraft carriers to the Strait of Hormuz?
Where did I say that?

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25688
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Australia kisses US arse to secure oil

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:19 pm

Redneck wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:13 pm
Black Orchid wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:02 pm
Redneck wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:50 pm
How many aircraft carriers do we have BO ???
Author : Richard Menhinick had an extensive career in the Royal Australian Navy, including commands at sea, ashore and on operations. He has also worked in strategic analysis and policy formulation.

"The navy of today and tomorrow is the same size in a ship sense as it was in 1976 when I joined, with about a dozen destroyers and frigates. However, strategically we’re significantly less effective vis-à-vis the region. The minister’s introduction to the 2016 defence white paper states that it ‘sets out the most ambitious plan to regenerate the Royal Australian Navy since the Second World War’. That sounds impressive, but it’s essentially misleading—in essence, we’re doing ship replacement. The navy remains too small and it’s a self-defence force, with limited power projection or ability to conduct sea control at distance.

We should be talking to the Australian public about strategic truths in a language they understand, explaining to them the new reality. To have self-reliance and self-help in this era requires a much larger, more potent navy. Fixed-wing, strike-capable aircraft carriers are required to project maritime air power via the short take-off, vertical landing version of the joint strike fighter. And we need perhaps twice the number of destroyers and frigates, so that we can really carry out aggressive operations against numerically larger air, surface and submarine threats, to dominate, deter and if necessary defeat. The submarines we’re getting are potentially good, but that’s an isolated area of improvement."
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/cleve ... tent-navy/
Show me where we are being requested to send aircraft carriers to the Strait of Hormuz?
Where did I say that?
Well you brought up aircraft carriers :rofl

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests