Whats the point?

[billy the kid]

More great news from the religion of peace.....the UK is finished...totally infested by the islamic scum...
"The death penalty for apostasy is part of islamic law. It’s based on the Qur’an: “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.” (Qur’an 4:89)

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “Whoever changed his islamic religion, then kill him” (Bukhari 9.84.57). The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law according to all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence.

This is still the position of all the schools of islamic jurisprudence, both Sunni and Shi’ite. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”

Qaradawi also once famously said: “If they had gotten rid of the apostasy punishment, Islam wouldn’t exist today.”

“muslim Asylum Seeker Imprisoned For Killing Wife Who Converted To Christianity,” by Joshua Gill, Daily Caller, April 5, 2019 (thanks to the Geller Report):

A U.K. court sentenced a muslim Iranian asylum seeker to jail Thursday for stabbing his wife to death, in part for her conversion to Christianity.

Iranian asylum seeker Dana Abdullah stabbed Avan Najmadiein, his estranged wife and 32-year-old mother of four, 50 times in October and left her to die after discovering that she refused to support his application to stay in the U.K., according to the BBC.

Abdullah, 35, returned illegally to the U.K. after being deported in 2013 for sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl and he previously threatened to kill his wife because she “dishonored” him by converting to Christianity, authorities said.

“It does show that you are not someone of good character and, having been deported for that matter, you chose to come back into this country illegally and have committed this very serious crime,” Judge Michael Chambers said of Abdullah, according to Premier.

Chambers also lambasted Abdullah for the callous and brutal nature of his crime.

“This was, on any view, a planned and pre-meditated murder involving a brutal and sustained attack using a knife – knowing full well that it would deprive four children under the age of eight of their mother,” Chambers said.

Chambers sentenced Abdullah to a minimum of 18 years and one month in prison.

Detective Victoria Downing characterized Abdullah as “an arrogant and controlling man,” asserting that he killed Najmadiein because he resented her rejection, her refusal to support his application and her conversion to Christianity.

Abdullah murdered Najmadiein with a kitchen knife at her home on Oct. 1, 2018, tried to set her kitchen ablaze in an attempt to erase evidence, then fled, initially to Liverpool, England, and then to Glasgow, Scotland. Authorities discovered Najmadiein’s body at her home when she failed to pick her children up from school. All of her children were under the age of eight at the time.

Abdullah turned himself in to police in Glasgow, but admitted only to being a “failed asylum-seeker” at the time.

Wilson Chowdhry, chairman of the British Pakistani Christian Association, said the violent persecution of those who convert to another religion from Islam is widespread in the U.K.

“We recently wrote a report for the hate crime inquiry on Islamophobia so that we could show the other side of the coin, where much of the persecution of apostates in this country is based on a real hatred for those who quit islam,” Chowdhry told Premier…."

[billy the kid]

https://www.nynganobserver.com.au/story ... s/?cs=5461

One protester said "This has no place in the 21st century."
Not sure if he meant the penalties or the infestation of islam worldwide...
Not sure if there were any protests in Australia.....probably not....too busy watching the boneheadball.......

[billy the kid]

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/05/asia ... index.html
At least this is a start...although no-one is coming out to condemn islam or sharia law....just the punishment
for the offence......

[billy the kid]

Why we should stop using the word "islamophobia"
The FBI defines violent extremism as "encouraging, condoning, justifying, or supporting the commission of a violent act to achieve political, ideological, religious, social, or economic goals." "Violent extremist" is a politically correct term for an Islamic terrorist. When a politician uses the term, the public is left in the dark as to why a terrorist attack was carried out.

Fast-forward to 2019, and no one is calling the Christchurch shooter a violent extremist. Australian prime minister Scott Morrison called him an "extremist, right-wing" terrorist.

Unlike Islamic terrorists, the Christchurch shooter's motivations are not being concealed from the public. In fact, many people on the Left are outraged if a politician fails to state what motivated him.

In Canada, Conservative leader Andrew Scheer has been criticized for not denouncing Islamophobia in his public statements following the terrorist attack. Although Scheer should have mentioned the Muslim victims in his first tweet, he was right not to include the word "Islamophobia."

Oxford defines Islamophobia as "dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force." The word suggests that it is not only wrong to dislike Islam, but also irrational. (Islamophobia sounds like a mental illness because a phobia is a mental disorder.)

As Pascal Bruckerner aptly states, "the word 'Islamophobia' amalgamates two very different concepts: the persecution of believers, which is a crime; and the critique of religion, which is a right." The word makes people believe that disliking Islam and disliking Muslims are both wrong.

There is all the difference in the world between disliking Islam and hating Muslims and wanting to kill them. Hatred of Muslims is always wrong, but it is not wrong to be opposed to Islam as a political force in society. Political Islam — through the implementation of sharia law — is incompatible with Western values and freedoms.

Sharia law comes from the Qur'an, the Hadith, and the rulings of Islamic scholars. It is a vital aspect of both spiritual and political Islam, and it is highly oppressive to women and minorities.

Here are three present-day examples: in Iran, men are executed for engaging in sexual activity with other men. In Pakistan, people have been sentenced to death for insulting the prophet Muhammad. In Brunei, the punishment for adultery is death by stoning.

In many countries, a majority of Muslims want an Islamic government based on sharia law. If Muslim immigrants want to implement sharia law in a Western nation, other citizens have the right to oppose them.

However, people who criticize Islam or Muslims (for any reason) are often accused of Islamophobia. As a case in point, Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat in the U.S. Congress, has accused both Republicans and Democrats of Islamophobia for being critical of Ilhan Omar. Omar is a Muslim member of Congress who has made controversial statements about Israel.

Publicly shaming someone (by accusing him of Islamophobia) is a means of controlling what people can and cannot say. When people are stigmatized for criticizing Islam or Muslims, it is a warning to others to remain silent.

Politicians should stop using the word "Islamophobia" because it puts good and bad people in the same box. In its place, a better alternative would be the word "Muslimphobia," which is similar to anti-Semitism. Both words stigmatize hate speech toward a group of people.

The First Amendment protects hate speech, but in a society that values virtue, hate speech should not be tolerated. Nevertheless, no one should be accused of hating Muslims because he is critical of Islam. Islam is not a race; it is a religion.

Freedom of speech includes the right to criticize any religious belief or practice you disagree with. When I went to university, professors frequently criticized Christianity. However, no professor was ever accused of Christophobia, and neither should he be.

When someone speaks out against Islamophobia, two important questions must be asked: is he trying to protect Muslims from hatred and violence? Or is he trying to shield Muslims and Islam from criticism?

No religion should be immune from criticism. If Islam cannot be criticized, there is no way to determine if its teachings and practices are true. The only way the truth about anything can be determined is by allowing everyone to express his point of view.

Christopher Lindsay is the author of Letters from a Madman, available on Amazon. Follow him on Twitter at https://twitter.com/chrislindsay70.

[billy the kid]

https://thereligionofpeace.com/

For all those interested in keeping up with the news on the infestation of the planet by islam.

[Black Orchid]

Jihad Report Mar 30, 2019 - Apr 05, 2019 (6 days)

Attacks 32
Killed 133
Injured 96
Suicide Blasts 0
Countries 12

[billy the kid]

Jihad Report Mar 30, 2019 - Apr 05, 2019 (6 days)

Attacks 32
Killed 133
Injured 96
Suicide Blasts 0
Countries 12

Thats not a good KTI ratio (killed to injured)...theyll be disappointed with that.....

[IQS.RLOW]

[/quote]

Killed 133

Must have all been xenophobic, islamophobes and racist against jihadists practicing their religion while the Muslim jihadists were trying to be inclusive.

[billy the kid]

http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/sp ... 111788862/

This is the type of stupid islamic demand that draws so much attention to islam.
They are now wanting the New Zealand RU team Crusaders change their name because it upsets
them...ffs...playing the victim again...
They say that anything that reinforces unity is good.
This is not reinforcing unity, its the infestation of islam making a demand for a change to suit islam.
Its just another advance by the infestation of islam which makes a change to suit islam...no-one else.
For years, islam has been chipping away at western civilization, demanding changes to suit islam.
These changes occur because of the dhimmitude of the mugs that allow the change.
islam relies on six factors to infest the world....islamophobia, dhimmitude, victimization, political
correctness, multiculturalism and taqiyaa.
All these factors allow the gradual infestation of all countries in preparedness for the totality
of sharia law and the worldwide caliphate.
muslim leaders throughout the world have announced that this is the goal of islam.
Its on record....You cant make this shit up....

[billy the kid]

Continued....
See how far you get if you demand a change in islam....oh no we cant and wont do that.....
Its all fkn one way with islam....I wonder if further name changes will be suggested...the Saracens comes to mind....
Funny thing...the Crusaders I believe defended the vulnerable and the oppressed...in this case islam is the
oppressor..muslims cant say in this case they are the liberators...
We can claim that Christianity liberates from backwardness, poverty, disease and ignorance. Where Christianity goes nations rise to greatness and stability. Where islam goes, islam’s fruits are that nations wallow in the 7th century ...in fear, superstition, bigotry, disease, inbreeding, extortion, bribery, graft, and female repression.... should there be a ‘crusade’ against the fruits of islam?..... yes, but we will have to make it a crusade against islamic ideology to be effective......
I suppose the next move will be to re-name Christchurch...
The koran states...take not the jews and christians for friends....it curses christians for believing in Jesus Christ
New Zealand is a society at the crossroads...with a dhimmi as PM....
islam senses a weakness in authority in NZ and it will exploit it to the max......poor Jacinta is being played.....