PH on Port Authur

[Gordon]

There's something weird going on here.

The editing jumps all over the place. I can see her food appear then disapear in shots from roughly the same angle.

It seems they've cobbled together speech over a long period of time to manufacture a statement.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-28/ ... e/10947112

[Black Orchid]

I think all the videos have been selectively edited.

[Black Orchid]

“An MP said it would actually take a massacre in Tasmania to change the gun laws in Australia,” Hanson told the al-Jazeera reporter Rodger Muller.

“Haven’t you heard that? Have a look at it. It was said on the floor of parliament. I’ve read a lot and I have read the book on it, Port Arthur. A lot of questions there.”

Sorry but I fail to see where Pauline said that Port Arthur was a government conspiracy.

[Redneck]

All TV stories are edited nothing new there!

How long was she with the secret reporters 2 hours?

Of course they only show the relevant bits ...

I do accept though she can request the whole video be released in case some comments were shown out of context!!

[Neferti]

YAWN!

[Redneck]

"My language has been murdered, my language has been murdered

My language has been murdered, my language has been murdered

I dont like it !"

[Gordon]

All TV stories are edited nothing new there!

How long was she with the secret reporters 2 hours?

Of course they only show the relevant bits ...

I do accept though she can request the whole video be released in case some comments were shown out of context!!

Here's tidbit of personal info for you. I used to be an editor in broadcast TV. (I actually even perused a contract for AJ at one stage).

In news editing when you condense a timeline you insert a video clue like a 10 frame white flash which shows viewers an edit has occurred. That's called ethical editing.

What my keen eyes can see in this video is the timeline has been screwed with and they video isn't IN chronological order, this takes them to the ethical level of ACA/TT.

Editing out non relevant bits is fine but cobbling together different portions of a long conversation to change context is dodgy.

[Neferti]

I'd say that the leftard techies at Your ABC are pulling a shifty, as usual.

I care less about Pauline but geeze ......

[Gordon]

I'd say that the leftard techies at Your ABC are pulling a shifty, as usual.

I care less about Pauline but geeze ......

Actually, the editorial policy at ABC would not allow that.

The program was 100% made by AJ but shame on the ABC for airing it when they know the whole premise was totally contrived and the editing was sus.

Honestly, this whole thing is as low as when A Current Affair leave $10 in a car then video a minimum wage car wash worker pocketing it.

[cods]

All TV stories are edited nothing new there!

How long was she with the secret reporters 2 hours?

Of course they only show the relevant bits ...

I do accept though she can request the whole video be released in case some comments were shown out of context!!

Here's tidbit of personal info for you. I used to be an editor in broadcast TV. (I actually even perused a contract for AJ at one stage).

In news editing when you condense a timeline you insert a video clue like a 10 frame white flash which shows viewers an edit has occurred. That's called ethical editing.

What my keen eyes can see in this video is the timeline has been screwed with and they video isn't IN chronological order, this takes them to the ethical level of ACA/TT.

Editing out non relevant bits is fine but cobbling together different portions of a long conversation to change context is dodgy.

gordy is there anything "ethical" about this whole caper?

this cannot be good journalism can it??....

3 years in the making ....