Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

[rhino]

A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/ ... netic.aspx

inconvenient truth

[brian ross]

There are no significant differences in IQs between the various "races" because the concept of "race" is a social, rather than a Genetic construct.

Genetics has shown that there are more differences within each "racial" group than between them. Genetics proves that the concept of "race" is purely superficial. We all share the same genetic pool. It is what allows all humans to interbreed. The differences caused by environmental evolution (ie skin colour, eye shape, lip thickness, kinkiness of hair, etc.) are superficial and not related to the intelligence or personality of the individuals concerned. Biological determinism (ir "Racism") is a false dichotomy promoted by pseudo-scientists who refuse to accept the reality of modern Genetics. "Race" is purely a social construct intended to allow one group to promote itself over other groups.

IQ tests are flawed because they reflect the social beliefs of the testers, rather than the tested. An IQ test designed for a 21st century American child will not be applicable to a 21st century Indigenous Australian or a 21st century African or Asian child. Attempting to measure something as unmeasurable as intelligence is a flawed concept.

[Bobby]

Yes -

The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.

So - the Asians are the smartest and the darkies are the dumbest.
We already knew that.

[rhino]

There are no significant differences in IQs between the various "races" because the concept of "race" is a social, rather than a Genetic construct.

Genetics has shown that there are more differences within each "racial" group than between them. Genetics proves that the concept of "race" is purely superficial. We all share the same genetic pool. It is what allows all humans to interbreed. The differences caused by environmental evolution (ie skin colour, eye shape, lip thickness, kinkiness of hair, etc.) are superficial and not related to the intelligence or personality of the individuals concerned. Biological determinism (ir "Racism") is a false dichotomy promoted by pseudo-scientists who refuse to accept the reality of modern Genetics. "Race" is purely a social construct intended to allow one group to promote itself over other groups.

IQ tests are flawed because they reflect the social beliefs of the testers, rather than the tested. An IQ test designed for a 21st century American child will not be applicable to a 21st century Indigenous Australian or a 21st century African or Asian child. Attempting to measure something as unmeasurable as intelligence is a flawed concept.

absolute nonsense Brian, if this was the case the whole field of forensic anthropology would not exist. and culturally unbiased IQ tests do exist and have been used for decades. You really are behind on the knowledge of this subject.

[rhino]

Yes -

The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.

So - the Asians are the smartest and the darkies are the dumbest.
We already knew that.

Crudely put , yes. And these differences still exist if we alter environmental conditions. For example if children of African heritage grow up in white households there are still measurable lower IQs. Nutrition is a factor in IQ but blacks in countries with better nutrition still have lower IQs.

[Bobby]

Yes -

The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.

So - the Asians are the smartest and the darkies are the dumbest.
We already knew that.

Crudely put , yes. And these differences still exist if we alter environmental conditions. For example if children of African heritage grow up in white households there are still measurable lower IQs. Nutrition is a factor in IQ but blacks in countries with better nutrition still have lower IQs.

Yes - ever noticed how many medical specialists and doctors are Asian?
Heaps of them and only the best and brightest can get through those courses -
or even start those courses with the high entry requirements.
It's just obvious that Asians are smarter than us - and it's scary.

[Black Orchid]

Yes -

The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.

So - the Asians are the smartest and the darkies are the dumbest.
We already knew that.

Crudely put , yes. And these differences still exist if we alter environmental conditions. For example if children of African heritage grow up in white households there are still measurable lower IQs. Nutrition is a factor in IQ but blacks in countries with better nutrition still have lower IQs.

Yes - ever noticed how many medical specialists and doctors are Asian?
Heaps of them and only the best and brightest can get through those courses -
or even start those courses with the high entry requirements.
It's just obvious that Asians are smarter than us - and it's scary.

Asians get through medical school because they have done nothing but study before, during and after school. Consequently they end up with no social skills and make shyte doctors.

[Bobby]

Asians get through medical school because they have done nothing but study before, during and after school. Consequently they end up with no social skills and make shyte doctors.

That's a generalisation -
I haven't found a bad one yet.
I find many doctors of European ancestry to be so full of themselves and have zero social skills.

[Valkie]

The darker the skin

The dumber the kin

[rhino]

I have to be honest here, you dont prove the rule Valkie.