New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

[brian ross]

I see no reason why people should be denied access to marriage simply because they want to marry some one of the same gender as them. I have had numerous gay and lesbian friends over the years and none have been paedophiles, none have wanted to marry multiple partners nor animals. Neferti, you are attempting scare tactics which will not, have not worked in the past and won't work in the future. Funny that. People are people and they want each other to be happy. Some gays and lesbians will want to marry, some won't, now they have the choice, exactly like straight people. I am unsure why you're attempting scare tactics over something which the majority of Australians accept and have welcomed.

[The Mechanic]

I see no reason why people should be denied access to marriage simply because they want to marry some one of the same gender as them. I have had numerous gay and lesbian friends over the years and none have been paedophiles, none have wanted to marry multiple partners nor animals. Neferti, you are attempting scare tactics which will not, have not worked in the past and won't work in the future. Funny that. People are people and they want each other to be happy. Some gays and lesbians will want to marry, some won't, now they have the choice, exactly like straight people. I am unsure why you're attempting scare tactics over something which the majority of Australians accept and have welcomed.

stop trying to "TWIST" the argument bwian

bo didnt say that Gay people shouldn't be allowed to get married .. just not in the church as that is not part of their religion..

they can get married.. or they can just not get married..

just like anyone else...

no one cares what they do.. and im pretty sure they don't care what we do...

but this constant dickswinging freak show in your face every time you open you eyes people DO object to..

the constant push to get this dickswinging bullshit into our schools to confuse and brainwash the children ... People object to...

this horseshit of identifying as an animal... or non sex.. is bullshit.. folks have had a GUTS full of it and there's going to be a huge backlash on the Gay community because of these FREAKS...

they just want to be left alone to live their lives like everyone else... not be subjected to be "thrusted" into the spotlight of F*** piles and dildos ...

have you no shame>??

[brian ross]

Neferti, not Black Orchid, was the poster I was referring to, Mechie. Neferti has often lamented the idea of same-sex marriage. I suggest you read what is written, not what you believe is written.

[Neferti]

I see no reason why people should be denied access to marriage simply because they want to marry some one of the same gender as them. I have had numerous gay and lesbian friends over the years and none have been paedophiles, none have wanted to marry multiple partners nor animals. Neferti, you are attempting scare tactics which will not, have not worked in the past and won't work in the future. Funny that. People are people and they want each other to be happy. Some gays and lesbians will want to marry, some won't, now they have the choice, exactly like straight people. I am unsure why you're attempting scare tactics over something which the majority of Australians accept and have welcomed.

NOBODY gives a flying fuck who you marry or don't marry.

However, those who have married under the new LAW will need to go through the DIVORCE procedure which involves MONEY, assets and property, and LAWYERS .... where as BEFORE this Law, you could live, happily forever( as a "defacto) after for up to 2 years before you had to SHARE assets on "breakdown of relationship". Marriage means as soon as you sign that bit of paper, you SHARE everything.

[brian ross]

I see no reason why people should be denied access to marriage simply because they want to marry some one of the same gender as them. I have had numerous gay and lesbian friends over the years and none have been paedophiles, none have wanted to marry multiple partners nor animals. Neferti, you are attempting scare tactics which will not, have not worked in the past and won't work in the future. Funny that. People are people and they want each other to be happy. Some gays and lesbians will want to marry, some won't, now they have the choice, exactly like straight people. I am unsure why you're attempting scare tactics over something which the majority of Australians accept and have welcomed.

NOBODY gives a flying fuck who you marry or don't marry.

However, those who have married under the new LAW will need to go through the DIVORCE procedure which involves MONEY, assets and property, and LAWYERS .... where as BEFORE this Law, you could live, happily forever( as a "defacto) after for up to 2 years before you had to SHARE assets on "breakdown of relationship". Marriage means as soon as you sign that bit of paper, you SHARE everything.

Unless of course, you have signed a Pre-Nuptial agreement, Neferti. As to involving lawyers in your divorce, that isn't necessary unless of course you want to contest it, then it goes before the Family Court and then you require lawyers (if you're smart). If you're dumb, you might try and represent yourself but as the old adage goes, "only idiots represent themselves."

The point is though, Gay and Lesbian people were denied access to legal marriage before last year. Why? Because John Winston Howard sought to prevent them having it by redefining the concept of marriage so that it could only occur between a "man and a woman". He did that 'cause he wanted to play "dog whistle" politics and drive a wedge between conservative labour voters and progressive labour voters. Well, it all failed in the end, now didn't it. Thank goodness, hey? All Australians equal before the law. Wonderful.

I am unsure why you're so anti-same-sex marriage, Neferti. It's all done and dusted. The majority made their point. A minority had it's rights returned to it which Howard savagely took away.

[Neferti]

I see no reason why people should be denied access to marriage simply because they want to marry some one of the same gender as them. I have had numerous gay and lesbian friends over the years and none have been paedophiles, none have wanted to marry multiple partners nor animals. Neferti, you are attempting scare tactics which will not, have not worked in the past and won't work in the future. Funny that. People are people and they want each other to be happy. Some gays and lesbians will want to marry, some won't, now they have the choice, exactly like straight people. I am unsure why you're attempting scare tactics over something which the majority of Australians accept and have welcomed.

NOBODY gives a flying fuck who you marry or don't marry.

However, those who have married under the new LAW will need to go through the DIVORCE procedure which involves MONEY, assets and property, and LAWYERS .... where as BEFORE this Law, you could live, happily forever( as a "defacto) after for up to 2 years before you had to SHARE assets on "breakdown of relationship". Marriage means as soon as you sign that bit of paper, you SHARE everything.

Unless of course, you have signed a Pre-Nuptial agreement, Neferti. As to involving lawyers in your divorce, that isn't necessary unless of course you want to contest it, then it goes before the Family Court and then you require lawyers (if you're smart). If you're dumb, you might try and represent yourself but as the old adage goes, "only idiots represent themselves."

The point is though, Gay and Lesbian people were denied access to legal marriage before last year. Why? Because John Winston Howard sought to prevent them having it by redefining the concept of marriage so that it could only occur between a "man and a woman". He did that 'cause he wanted to play "dog whistle" politics and drive a wedge between conservative labour voters and progressive labour voters. Well, it all failed in the end, now didn't it. Thank goodness, hey? All Australians equal before the law. Wonderful.

I am unsure why you're so anti-same-sex marriage, Neferti. It's all done and dusted. The majority made their point. A minority had it's rights returned to it which Howard savagely took away.

You talk a lot of crap!

[The Mechanic]

Just Sayin...

[The Mechanic]

he couldn't even fill 1/3 of that budgie smuggler...

[The Reboot]

Just Sayin...

The one on the right looks like Marise Payne, if she dyed her hair and dropped a kilo or twenty.

[Valkie]

The only reason gay marriage was passed, was to shut up the ever whining continued crap that the LGBTIQSELFISH mob constantly went on about.

But there were other factors taken into account by the grubberment.
The fact that now, they could classify same sex coup,as as defactos gives them ability to claim off the partner.
The grubberment could reduce welfare layouts, due to defacto to relationships.

It also opens the books to allow all manner of other insidious money spinning ideas to produce income for the grubberment, or so they though.

I did not see the huge upswing in marriages and associated spending that the grubberment envisaged.
The gay wedding industry was, at best, very subdued.
Little if any profit was made.

But the serious side effect was that now, with one win under their belt, the terminally perverted are aiming high.
They see a future where every child is as perverted as they are, giving them a much larger selection of willing perverts to prey upon.

The safe schools programme is only the start.
It will get worse and more perverted.

The gays wanted legal marriage to make those who see their perversion for what it is to have to accept them as normal.

They are not NORMAL.
Marriage is, as defined in virtually every religious text, the joining of a man And a woman in holy matrimony.

I'll believe in gay marriage when it's accepted in the Islam is faith.
But the terminally perverted will never attempt this as they know what the result woukd be.

Bwyannnnnn woukd have you believe that he supports gays.
But we all know his true loyalty lies with muzzos.

I wonder how his twisted little brain mixes the two together?