New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

[cods]

imagine if that sign said..


behead all those who

insult White Races..

would they be in prison? more than likely.

[The Mechanic]

They DO NOT and WILL NOT ever fit into the Australian model of Christian society..

so its simples..

DO NOT being them here...

if we need immigrants at all - bring them from countries not unlike ours who will assimilate with our way of life...

why on earth would you bring anyone here who hates us and wants to kill us?

Brian?

sorry - but if you are a gutless coward who wont fight for your own country and make it better then don't come here and try to change our way of life...

[brian ross]

The message on the signs was far from peaceful, it was violent and hideous, as was the 'riot'. Isn't that the point of a sign? The message on it? I see nothing peaceful about it.

I see nothing peaceful in this sign, Black Orchid:



Will you back my calls for it to be removed and the sign holders/writers to be imprisoned? Mmmm?

Freedom of Speech is exactly that, Black Orchid - freedom to say what is on your mind, in a reasonable, non-insulting manner without fear of repercussions. It it insults you, tough. You have to accept it. Your freedom to retaliate ends, as they say at the end of the speaker's nose. You can criticise them back, you cannot demand that they stop. You can ask them to be polite and hopefully being civilised, they will comply.

Tories like to rabbit on about Freedom of Speech - when the agree with what is being said but when they oppose it, they oppose Freedom of Speech. Simples really. Holding a sign, burning a flag, shouting a slogan - it is just hot air. When they move beyond that to bashing people, to killing them, that is illegal and I will oppose that no matter who does it.

[Black Orchid]

I don't approve of those signs either Brian but calling someone a bitch is miles apart from calling to chop off their head

[brian ross]

I don't approve of those signs either Brian but calling someone a bitch is miles apart from calling to chop off their head

Oh, there are worse and I am sure you know there are worse, Black Orchid. The Tories like to scream about Freedom of Speech, don't you? Yet when someone suggests Tories have gone too far... Oh, well, I suppose we could always put Tone Rabbit and il Duce' Dutton in a chaff bag and take them off Sydney heads, hey?

[Black Orchid]

You put up the example Brian and I have already said I don't approve of any nonsense like that but to compare being called a bitch with a call to behead those who insult the profit aren't in the same league. Not even close.

I am sorry you can't understand that.

[The Reboot]

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. What a shame you haven't changed then, hey? No real "Reboot" as far as you're concerned, right?

My "tut, tuting" is a consequence of reading the same tired old Racist/Islamophobic/Xenophobic bullshit, year after year from the same fools who make those remarks. To them, biological determinism rules supreme. Shame Genetics proves them wrong, time after time. They hate people who look different/act different/worship different religions to what they approve of. To them, skin colour determines intelligence and how people act, rather than whether or not some people just have a darker tan than others. There is more genetic differences within each so-called "racial" group than between them. We all share the same genetic pool, it is what makes us all one species, Homo Sapien Sapiens. It is what allows us all to interbred with one another, no matter what the colour of our skin, the shape of our eyes or any other physical difference they dream up.

Time they caught up with the 85% of Australians who support Multiculturalism and stopped pinning for a past which is long gone. They however, never learn, no matter how much proof is put in front of them, they just refuse to look or understand how much their views are past.

Genetics has fuck all to do with it. It is social engineering that is the issue.

There's never going to be a peaceful wonderland, such notion is extremely dumb and naive, despite your holier-than-thou government approved social engineering. Your "racism" is only a minor part of that, which blatantly tells me you're a racist in reverse.

You are quick to tar the users on Ozpol and here whom you disagree with, with the same brush.

I identify their arguments for what they are, You apparently have problems with people being told they are spouting Racism when they spout, well, Racism. If you want them to stop spouting Racism, tell them, don't attack me for correctly identifying their arguments for what they are.

Biological determinism believes that because of the amount of Melanin in a person's skin, they are more or less intelligent than other people. Genetics prove that to be false. We are all drawn from the same Genetics pool. We all share the same Genes. Skin colour/lip thickness/the presence of epicanthic folds on the eye/etc. are superficial adaptations to specific environmental factors caused by evolution, nothing more.

What of those racial groups you stick up for, and alternate religions you stick up for? They get a free pass from you because your brainwashing dictates that they are oppressed.

I am not brainwashed. I am sorry for you that you see an effort to defend people against unfair and unnecessary persecution is wrong. I really do.

Anything to say about the below images?

I see people exercising their right to Freedom of Speech. I don't see a problem with either group. Flag burning is a legitimate political statement. Holding up signs - peacefully - is as well. If they decide to move beyond that to violence, then I will speak out against them. People here like to parrot on about the right to Freedom of Speech but they are awfully quick to call for those exercising it with messages they disagree with to be silenced.

Why is it you only snipe people of white and/or Christian descent and background?

Because there are few, if any non-White and/or non-Christian people on the web. Funny how it's hard to attack someone when there is no one there making stupid statements, now isn't it, Reboot?

What's the difference between Islam and Christianity anyway? Both are organized religions, both have doctrines that go against the nature of your leftwing doctrines... and if your response is, "Culture" I am going to laugh my arse off.

Oh, I agree, I agree. Organised religion is as Marx suggested, an "opiate of the masses."

You see nothing wrong with a call to behead people? You see nothing wrong with burning the Australian flag and persecuting this lovely multicultural wet dream of a country in doing so?

"Freedom of speech" is your excuse for these imbeciles? Yet you insult the people on this board for exercising theirs, and then make a statement critisizing them for the same reason.

This has been an interesting and amusing discussion, Brian.

The irony..

[brian ross]

You see nothing wrong with a call to behead people? You see nothing wrong with burning the Australian flag and persecuting this lovely multicultural wet dream of a country in doing so?

No, I don't. You however, appear to have problems with people (peacefully) making a point. I wonder why?

"Freedom of speech" is your excuse for these imbeciles? Yet you insult the people on this board for exercising theirs, and then make a statement critisizing them for the same reason.

Would you care to quote me, with a link, where I have suggested that someone should lose their right to make a statement here, please? Here, this is even a spot where you can do it:

I look forward to reading your efforts or will you slink away like all my critics? People like you like to read what they like in what I type rather than what I actually type. Funny that, hey?

This has been an interesting and amusing discussion, Brian.

The irony..

Indeed. You appear to have missed it completely, hey?

[The Reboot]

You see nothing wrong with a call to behead people? You see nothing wrong with burning the Australian flag and persecuting this lovely multicultural wet dream of a country in doing so?

No, I don't. You however, appear to have problems with people (peacefully) making a point. I wonder why?

"Freedom of speech" is your excuse for these imbeciles? Yet you insult the people on this board for exercising theirs, and then make a statement critisizing them for the same reason.

Would you care to quote me, with a link, where I have suggested that someone should lose their right to make a statement here, please? Here, this is even a spot where you can do it:

I look forward to reading your efforts or will you slink away like all my critics? People like you like to read what they like in what I type rather than what I actually type. Funny that, hey?

This has been an interesting and amusing discussion, Brian.

The irony..

Indeed. You appear to have missed it completely, hey?

I don't have a problem with people "peacefully" making a point. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You made no snide comments about that "peaceful protestor" holding up a sign that basically says "behead all who don't follow my prophet". That includes you, and me. Why no comments about how that tosser should run back to the playground, tut tut? Instead, you justified their actions.

I also have a problem with this. Case in point.



The person who drew this was raked under the coals in media, declared a racist bigot etc etc. Yet NOTHING (save for people similarly minded to the people YOU snipe on this forum) is said about a call for beheading...

Anything to say about the person who drew that picture? I look forward to your comments on this.

[brian ross]

You see nothing wrong with a call to behead people? You see nothing wrong with burning the Australian flag and persecuting this lovely multicultural wet dream of a country in doing so?

No, I don't. You however, appear to have problems with people (peacefully) making a point. I wonder why?

"Freedom of speech" is your excuse for these imbeciles? Yet you insult the people on this board for exercising theirs, and then make a statement critisizing them for the same reason.

Would you care to quote me, with a link, where I have suggested that someone should lose their right to make a statement here, please? Here, this is even a spot where you can do it:

I look forward to reading your efforts or will you slink away like all my critics? People like you like to read what they like in what I type rather than what I actually type. Funny that, hey?

This has been an interesting and amusing discussion, Brian.

The irony..

Indeed. You appear to have missed it completely, hey?

I don't have a problem with people "peacefully" making a point. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You made no snide comments about that "peaceful protestor" holding up a sign that basically says "behead all who don't follow my prophet". That includes you, and me. Why no comments about how that tosser should run back to the playground, tut tut? Instead, you justified their actions.

I also have a problem with this. Case in point.



The person who drew this was raked under the coals in media, declared a racist bigot etc etc. Yet NOTHING (save for people similarly minded to the people YOU snipe on this forum) is said about a call for beheading...

Anything to say about the person who drew that picture? I look forward to your comments on this.

Ah, the ol'"lets change the subject, rather than address the points being made," trick, hey, Reboot? Really? Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Oh, and BTW, it is "raked over the coals" not "raked under the coals". Are you sure English isn't a second language to you?

Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:

I look forward to reading it. Or how about you just declare you were mistaken? Mmmmm?