Facts about CO2...

[The Mechanic]

On behalf of nature lets's add some perspective to the CO2 debate.

Carbon dioxide is an atmospheric trace gas essential to all life on Earth and is currently at 0.04 per cent - LESS THAN ONE TWENTIETH OF ONE PER CENT.

CO2 has in the past been 10 times its current levels and did not cause runaway warming or catastrophic climate change. In fact, higher CO2 levels happened as the Earth entered ice ages.

Nature alone determines the CO2 level in the atmosphere. Even the UN's climate body, the IPCC admits the oceans hold 50 times the CO2 (in dissolved form) than is present in the atmosphere. Warming oceans release CO2 into the atmosphere.

Over long historical periods, nature shows us that there is no correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature.

Over some periods, changes in temperature precede and cause changes in atmospheric CO2 levels.

Time to stop the nonsense...

The leftwits have been lying through their teeth over the past 30 years... People need to wake up... This is the Biggest Scam in history!!

[brian ross]

[Source]

Nasa rather than using false statistics on CO^2 levels with fake scales, uses realistic scales which show shockingly, just how much CO^2 man's burning of Fossil Fuels has created.

[Valkie]

[Source]

Nasa rather than using false statistics on CO^2 levels with fake scales, uses realistic scales which show shockingly, just how much CO^2 man's burning of Fossil Fuels has created.

I see atrend in that graph.

It goes up rather rapidly and then gradually goes back down.

Even on the graph, it showes that it has not reached the highest peak that it has in the past.

Most importantly, the cycle appears to be reasonably cyclic and that this particular rise fits nicely into the cycle.

They graph to me shows normality, not some catastrophic run away event.

[Black Orchid]

Even on the graph, it showes that it has not reached the highest peak that it has in the past.

We must be looking at different graphs.

[brian ross]

Even on the graph, it showes that it has not reached the highest peak that it has in the past.

We must be looking at different graphs.

Indeed...

[Valkie]

Even on the graph, it showes that it has not reached the highest peak that it has in the past.

We must be looking at different graphs.

Hard to see the tiny writing on my phone screen.

But the other comments are valid.
And I take those results with a grain of salt.
If it were that bad we woukd be suffocating, or worse, it could affect the horsepower of my car and boat......