Stralya Day

Home, Family, Pets, Food, Gardening, Hobbies and General Lifestyle topics.
Post Reply
User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: Stralya Day

Post by brian ross » Tue Jan 29, 2019 1:47 pm

War was never prohibited after WWII. :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Valkie
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm

Re: Stralya Day

Post by Valkie » Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:25 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:39 pm
Here's another little inconvenient truth for the "Invasion Day" numpties ...
January is here and the invasion versus settlement debate is back making news headlines.

The Prime Minister wants to keep Australia Day as it is while the Greens are calling for the date to be changed.

We've all heard the generic talking points.

Team 'Invasion Day' says 26 January is offensive to some Australians.

Team 'Australia Day' says 26 January is a day for all Australians regardless.

Yet there is a fundamental point which goes to the heart of this debate that literally no one, to date, seems to have picked up on. Hence, this article.


Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded.

Why? Because international law recognises territories acquired through invasion and annexation by force, prior to the prohibition of war following World War II, as lawful conquests.

Provided that all citizens of a lawfully conquered territory are granted equal rights by the local law, the descendants of the conqueror and the conquered are not considered two separate peoples.

This in turn invalidates any claims to separate land rights under the same jurisdiction.

As one of the 193 member states of the United Nations, Australia is not exempt from this 'Right of Conquest'.

Yet we do recognise separate land rights because the historic Mabo Decision in 1992 rested on the correct presumption that Australia was settled, not invaded.

In their ruling, Justices Brennan, Deane, Gaudron, Toohey, Mason and McHugh acknowledged that native title could have been intentionally extinguished by the use of government powers, but wasn't.

They proceeded to reject the 'terra nullius' doctrine without overturning the traditional view that the Australian landmass had in fact been settled.

Had Australia actually been invaded, the descendants of its native population would be classified as a conquered people and their land rights would be abolished.
More at https://www.watoday.com.au/national/wes ... 0l9hb.html

LIKE

Now we just have to splain that to the abbos .
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Stralya Day

Post by IQS.RLOW » Wed Jan 30, 2019 2:29 am

brian ross wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 1:47 pm
War was never prohibited after WWII. :roll:
Can you repeat the question that the voices in your head asked?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests