Sarah spends $1 mill on travel.

[brian ross]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, you're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

[Redneck]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, you're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

Cods cant see the topic is a nonsense!

She is not prepared to examine it closely that is her problem.

SHYs expenses are no worse than (in fact better) than half the other pollies when you accept the period of time they are over.

Its a usual Murdoch paper beat up!

BTW I hate SHY and her party but fair is fair and we should be able to see that in what we read!

[Bobby]

Come on Red,
she is just like many other pollys -
her snout is in the public trough.

[cods]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, y


well reading SARAH IN THE TITLE threw me a little I guess.

and yes I have commented in ozpol.. this is a copy thread and redmund is well aware of that..thank you!

I dont recall asking you to make a thread on corman or susan.... but be my guest..

[cods]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, you're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

Cods cant see the topic is a nonsense!

She is not prepared to examine it closely that is her problem.

SHYs expenses are no worse than (in fact better) than half the other pollies when you accept the period of time they are over.

Its a usual Murdoch paper beat up!

BTW I hate SHY and her party but fair is fair and we should be able to see that in what we read!

so its my fault?????...

you are whinging about talking about SHY....its all b een pointed out at ozpol....bobby perhaps wasnt using the best example... he is after all defending ANNING.....but it was pointed out this was a 6 yr effort for shy right from the beginning.....

was susan ley on the front bench when she run up her bills???... I dont know all I am saying is..

make a thread on her.....but why bobby should b ring her in SO WE RIGHTIES CAN CONDEMN her I dont really know...

anyway keep bleating about Murdoch you guys hav e to blame someone else for everything anyway may as well get in practice...

[Redneck]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, you're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

Cods cant see the topic is a nonsense!

She is not prepared to examine it closely that is her problem.

SHYs expenses are no worse than (in fact better) than half the other pollies when you accept the period of time they are over.

Its a usual Murdoch paper beat up!

BTW I hate SHY and her party but fair is fair and we should be able to see that in what we read!

so its my fault?????...

you are whinging about talking about SHY....its all b een pointed out at ozpol....bobby perhaps wasnt using the best example... he is after all defending ANNING.....but it was pointed out this was a 6 yr effort for shy right from the beginning.....

was susan ley on the front bench when she run up her bills???... I dont know all I am saying is..

make a thread on her.....but why bobby should b ring her in SO WE RIGHTIES CAN CONDEMN her I dont really know...

anyway keep bleating about Murdoch you guys hav e to blame someone else for everything anyway may as well get in practice...

Yep it is your fault for not reading and making an objective opinion based on the real facts!

Not just trying to score points on others opinions!

BTW I hate SHY!

[brian ross]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, ou're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

well reading SARAH IN THE TITLE threw me a little I guess.

and yes I have commented in ozpol.. this is a copy thread and redmund is well aware of that..thank you!

I dont recall asking you to make a thread on corman or susan.... but be my guest..

Why bother? We have a thread here devoted it seems to the supposed misuse of Parliamentary benefits. Why not discuss it here? Why bother with a new thread, Cods?

As I have pointed out - twice now - S-H-Y is not guilty of misusing her Parliamentary benefits. Cormann appears to have misused them and so does Ley. Is it because they are Tories you're not interested in commenting about their antics? Mmmm?

[Bobby]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, ou're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

well reading SARAH IN THE TITLE threw me a little I guess.

and yes I have commented in ozpol.. this is a copy thread and redmund is well aware of that..thank you!

I dont recall asking you to make a thread on corman or susan.... but be my guest..

Why bother? We have a thread here devoted it seems to the supposed misuse of Parliamentary benefits. Why not discuss it here? Why bother with a new thread, Cods?

As I have pointed out - twice now - S-H-Y is not guilty of misusing her Parliamentary benefits. Cormann appears to have misused them and so does Ley. Is it because they are Tories you're not interested in commenting about their antics? Mmmm?

Most of the Pollys abuse their travel allowance.


This thread is about the abuse by SHY.

[Redneck]

This sort of thing can really only be examine against the Parliamentary regulations, Cods. Then you have what other parliamentarians have gotten away with. Why is there no interest in Cormann's antics? How about Ley's? Sarah Hanson-Young's total looks bad until you examine it closely. Why haven't you commented on that, afterall, ou're the one who is claiming this thread is about S-H-Y.

well reading SARAH IN THE TITLE threw me a little I guess.

and yes I have commented in ozpol.. this is a copy thread and redmund is well aware of that..thank you!

I dont recall asking you to make a thread on corman or susan.... but be my guest..

Why bother? We have a thread here devoted it seems to the supposed misuse of Parliamentary benefits. Why not discuss it here? Why bother with a new thread, Cods?

As I have pointed out - twice now - S-H-Y is not guilty of misusing her Parliamentary benefits. Cormann appears to have misused them and so does Ley. Is it because they are Tories you're not interested in commenting about their antics? Mmmm?

Most of the Pollys abuse their travel allowance.


This thread is about the abuse by SHY.

Much as I hate her and the Greens there was NO ABUSE BY SHY that I can see!

DICKHEAD!

[Black Orchid]

Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young left a $20,000 debt to taxpayers unpaid for almost a year, even ignoring an official payment request made on the very day she was in parliament trying to block budget savings measures.

GREENS Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has defended spending more than $3500 in taxpayer funds on a whale watching trip for her and her daughter, saying she was just doing her job.

The South Australian Senator has admitted to charging the September trip to the Great Australian Bight — where she guzzled oysters, took selfies, and spotted dozens of whales — to the public.

After the overnight trip Ms Hanson-Young posted more than 20 pictures to Facebook showing mother and daughter enjoying themselves on the pristine coastline.

Yes, sure, they all do it and it needs to STOP!!

I particularly dislike SHY though.