Africans are really retarded, low IQ? They're making PINK lip tattoos.

[Black Orchid]

There are 7.5 billion blacks in the world so you will need more than a few pics to attempt to prove any point.

[Rorschach]

don't be a complete ignoramus....

do some reading.

[Black Orchid]

I know you don't like people disagreeing with you but if we have say 10 million blacks who are genius out of 7.5 billion that makes 1.3%.

As for this ...

US statistics prove that Africans newly arrived in America score higher than "Black" African Americans... gee I wonder why? Hint; environment

It's ludicrous.
As someone else said. If environment were the factor it would be the reverse of what you are claiming.

[rhino]

Inconvenient truths to some.

IQ is a measure of human intelligence. It’s not a test of education; in fact, IQ tests don’t even require literacy and children as young as two years old can be tested. Things like being raised in a home with books and a quality education show little impact on IQ. The latest research shows IQ to be primarily genetic—possibly as much as 80 percent.

Statistically, much is correlated with IQ, such as income, job performance and career path, fertility rate, crime and incarceration rates, happiness and life satisfaction, health and rates of disease, life expectancy, rates of marriage and divorce, whether a woman will have children out of wedlock, and welfare use. There are undeniable facts about IQ, and ignoring them is having disastrous effects on societies.

Here are a few examples from non-Hispanic whites:

Of those with IQs above 125, 2 percent had a child out of wedlock, compared to 32 percent of those with IQs less than 75.
Only 2 percent with high IQs live in poverty, compared to 30 percent with IQs less than 75.
The percentage of high-school dropouts is 55 percent for IQs under 75; 35 percent for IQs from 75-90; 6 percent for the mid-range between 90-110; 0.4 percent for IQs from 110-125; and 0 percent for IQs above 125.
Mid-range IQs have the most likelihood of being married before age 30. Those with high IQs (above 125) are less likely to be married by age 30 those with the lowest IQs.
White men with the highest IQs are the least likely to be incarcerated (0 percent), but for IQs under 75 it jumps to 7 percent.
Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray, authors of The Bell Curve, devised a Middle Class Values Index that ranks a person’s likelihood of having a stereotypical middle class life, such as graduating from high school, not being incarcerated, being married to one’s first spouse, being in the labor force (for men), and not having a child out of wedlock (for women). The lower the IQ, the less likely someone is to live such values: 16 percent for under 75 IQ; 30 percent for IQs from 75-90; 50 percent for IQs 90-100; 67 percent for IQs 110-125; and 74 percent of those with IQs above 125 have these middle-class values.
In addition, IQ scores are the best predictor of whether people will be economically successful in Western society.
This doesn’t mean all high-IQ people will have high salaries—just that it’s incredibly unusual to find someone with a high IQ, with no physical disability or mental disorder, who’s taking government handouts. An IQ above 100 means you’re more than likely able to carry on a middle-class job and stable life in a Western country. (As an aside, high IQs are advantageous and often necessary for complex jobs, but provide no real advantage for jobs like manual labor.)

http://aristocratsofthesoul.com/average ... ethnicity/

[Rorschach]

I'm sorry you believe crap Rhino... do more research

maybe do an IQ test yourself and see how wrong that crap actually is....

Anyway I've posted the truth and facts here deny them all you like.

[rhino]

No, you havent posted facts. You have posted opinion accompanied by a cobbled together collection of opinion based links which you hope do but actually dont support your argument. Here are actual facts. Race exists, there are racial differences and IQ is one of them. These are all scientific facts.

[BigP]

there are racial differences and IQ is one of them. These are all scientific facts.

Race and culture undeniably influence IQ

[BigP]

Its only a matter of time before scientists discover the monkey gene that is holding all these black fellas back

[Rorschach]

No, you havent posted facts. You have posted opinion accompanied by a cobbled together collection of opinion based links which you hope do but actually dont support your argument. Here are actual facts. Race exists, there are racial differences and IQ is one of them. These are all scientific facts.

Ah no I posted facts.... now run along back to denial land there's a good Rhino. You should read the contradictions in your own posts before posting them...

I know race exists... dopey.... where have I ever said it doesn't? hmmmm.

IQ is a flawed test... it doesn't show how genetics affect intelligence... not 1 little bit.
You are ignorant and confused.

[Rorschach]

The idea that intelligence can be measured by IQ tests alone is a fallacy according to the largest single study into human cognition which found that it comprises of at least three distinct mental traits.

IQ tests have been used for decades to assess intelligence but they are fundamentally flawed because they do not take into account the complex nature of the human intellect and its different components, the study found.

The results question the validity of controversial studies of intelligence based on IQ tests which have drawn links between intellectual ability race, gender and social class and led to highly contentious claims that some groups of people are inherently less intelligent that other groups.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 25911.html

IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence, according to a study which found that a minimum of three different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.

The IQ test is an exam most of us are familiar with, regardless of whether we have taken it or not. The test was originally designed by the French psychologist Alfred Binet in the early 1900s. But in the new millennium, is the IQ test still an effective means of measuring general intelligence? According to the general consensus, the answer is "no."

Ah, I remember you being in denial about Binet....

Intelligence is defined as general cognitive problem-solving skills. Since the days of Binet, psychologists have agreed that intelligence is much more complex than a single number and may be in fact divided into many subcategories. This is where the IQ test falls short. A Canadian study published online in the journal Neuron concluded that the IQ test is “fundamentally flawed,” seeing that its questions “grossly oversimplify the abilities of the human brain.”

The report identified three indications of human intelligence: short term memory, reasoning skills, and verbal ability. None of these skills are at all accurately measured in the traditional IQ test. So what does the IQ test accurately measure? Well according to Laci Green, host of DNews, “What the IQ test did measured was how well Westerners might do in Western schools.”

While the IQ test may give an indication of general intelligence, it can't measure the entire complexity of the human thought process. Creativity, emotional sensitivity, social understanding, and various acquired skills such as music or art, are excluded from test’s measurements of intelligence. If you’d like to get an idea of your IQ take this test, but just remember that whatever your score be, it doesn’t necessarily define how smart you really are.

Though IQ is used as a way to steadily measure intelligence, it’s not without its fall-backs. One major misconception people have about IQ is the belief that, when one measures a person’s IQ, they’re getting a complete and thorough view of the mental capabilities of that person. In fact, this belief is unutterably wrong. Howard Gardner, a Psychologist at Harvard, described IQ tests as being verbally biased and skewed by language:

IQ tests are not without personal bias as well, Scott Barry Kaufman, Ph.D, briefly describes the fact that the test-makers and test administrators cannot fully block out past experiences, leading to bias. It’s worth noting that test results can even vary from test to test, making them very inexact.

IQ tests measure very specific abilities, at a very specific instance in a person’s life, and applying the score as a broad measure of lifelong intelligence is silly. Many Intelligence researchers are steering tests away from the single score IQ and more towards a multiple scored “cognitive ability” tests.

Apparently, the IQ test is designed in a manner that emphasizes on skills that are important to certain societies. For instance, Australian Aboriginal children, raised in the deserts scored well on a test meant to assess visual memory but not in the IQ test.

Visual memory is more important for these people than anything else as they need to find their ways through the desert.
The intelligence quotient test is based on arbitrary standards set by man and is not written in stone.

https://www.storypick.com/iq-test/

The studies, the reports, the facts and opinions go on and on and on... I studied educational psychology... when I tell you something about this its because I have actually studied it.