Why was Tesla obsessed with 3, 6, 9?
- FLEKTARN
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:46 pm
- Location: Varna / Salzburg
Re: Why was Tesla obsessed with 3, 6, 9?
1. Now, if that's not weird enough, look at this:
We had a $86 million net cash outflow from operations in Q4 primarily due to a $143 million increase in finished goods inventory primarily for cars in transit, $74 million of growth in accounts receivable related mainly to deliveries late in the quarter and $60 million of cash used for directly leasing vehicles. Capital expenditures in the quarter totaled $369 million, and cash at quarter end, including cash equivalents was $1.9 billion.
http://ir.tesla.com/static-files/be63b4 ... 45f60e5b79
2. Piper also raised its price target on Tesla's stock by 65% to $369 from $223
https://www.nasdaq.com/article/tesla-on ... h-cm772445
3. Also the BMW hybryd i8 has exactly 369 horsepower.
https://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/bmwi/bm ... tions.html
Coincidence much?
Last edited by FLEKTARN on Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
The one that says the least can often have a very different perspective and hold the answer. The least qualified person may hold the most wisdom. When you don’t have knowledge or experience blocking your perspective, you can see problems and solutions.
- FLEKTARN
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:46 pm
- Location: Varna / Salzburg
Re: Why was Tesla obsessed with 3, 6, 9?
More:
In the interview, Musk provided a detailed timeline of the events leading up to the Twitter postings on August 7th in which he said he was considering taking the company private at $420 (€369) a share. He asserted that he had “funding secured” for such a deal – a transaction likely to be worth well over $10 billion.
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/inn ... -1.3599339
And this is pretty crazy too:
3 x 37 = 111
6 x 37 = 222
9 x 37 = 333
In the interview, Musk provided a detailed timeline of the events leading up to the Twitter postings on August 7th in which he said he was considering taking the company private at $420 (€369) a share. He asserted that he had “funding secured” for such a deal – a transaction likely to be worth well over $10 billion.
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/inn ... -1.3599339
And this is pretty crazy too:
3 x 37 = 111
6 x 37 = 222
9 x 37 = 333
The one that says the least can often have a very different perspective and hold the answer. The least qualified person may hold the most wisdom. When you don’t have knowledge or experience blocking your perspective, you can see problems and solutions.
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Why was Tesla obsessed with 3, 6, 9?
FLEKTARN wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:15 amsprintcyclist wrote: ↑Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:04 pm
Ah, to goad someone, to antagonise them.
Take care Flektarn
Thanks
See this for a sec.
Looking closely at the pattern of 3 and 6 you realize that 3 and 6 equals 9, 6 and 3 equals 9, all the numbers together equal 9, both ways excluding and including 3 and 6. So 9 means unity of the both sides. 9 is The Universe itself?
A circle has 360 degrees. (3+6+0=9)
Semicircle has 180 degrees. (1+8+0=9)
One fourth of circle has 90 degrees. (9+0=9)
45 degree (4+5=9)
22.5 degree. (2+2+5=9)
11.25 degree (1+1+2+5=9)
a pattern develops when bisecting a circle. Resulting angle always reduces to 9.
Now see sum of angles of regular polygons.
Triangle=180 degree (1+8+0=9)
Square= 360 degree (3+6+0=9)
Pentagon= 540 (5+4+0=9)
Hexagon = 720 (7+2+0=9)
Heptagon=1080 (1+0+8+0=9)
Octagon = 1260 (1+2+6+0=9)
and so on......
Tesla made earthquakes in 1899.
September 3, 1899
September 6, 1899
September 9, 1899
It may be explained with the MAGnificence of the three, six & nine... that in truth are dates in September, 1899, when Tesla made the land wave like the sea, Yakutat Bay earthquakes from Colorado Springs.
Wow.
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
- BigP
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm
Re: Why was Tesla obsessed with 3, 6, 9?
In base 10 a positive number is divisible by 9 if and only if its digital root is 9. That is, if any natural number is multiplied by 9, and the digits of the answer are repeatedly added until it is just one digit, the sum will be nine: 2 × 9 = 18 (1 + 8 = 9)sprintcyclist wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:35 pmFLEKTARN wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:15 amsprintcyclist wrote: ↑Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:04 pm
Ah, to goad someone, to antagonise them.
Take care Flektarn
Thanks
See this for a sec.
Looking closely at the pattern of 3 and 6 you realize that 3 and 6 equals 9, 6 and 3 equals 9, all the numbers together equal 9, both ways excluding and including 3 and 6. So 9 means unity of the both sides. 9 is The Universe itself?
A circle has 360 degrees. (3+6+0=9)
Semicircle has 180 degrees. (1+8+0=9)
One fourth of circle has 90 degrees. (9+0=9)
45 degree (4+5=9)
22.5 degree. (2+2+5=9)
11.25 degree (1+1+2+5=9)
a pattern develops when bisecting a circle. Resulting angle always reduces to 9.
Now see sum of angles of regular polygons.
Triangle=180 degree (1+8+0=9)
Square= 360 degree (3+6+0=9)
Pentagon= 540 (5+4+0=9)
Hexagon = 720 (7+2+0=9)
Heptagon=1080 (1+0+8+0=9)
Octagon = 1260 (1+2+6+0=9)
and so on......
Tesla made earthquakes in 1899.
September 3, 1899
September 6, 1899
September 9, 1899
It may be explained with the MAGnificence of the three, six & nine... that in truth are dates in September, 1899, when Tesla made the land wave like the sea, Yakutat Bay earthquakes from Colorado Springs.
Wow.
- BigP
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm
Re: Why was Tesla obsessed with 3, 6, 9?
The Divisibility Rules: 3, 6, 9
Have you ever wondered why some numbers will divide evenly (without a remainder) into a number, while others will not? The Divisibility Rules help us to determine if a number will divide into another number without actually having to divide. There is a divisibility rule for every number. However, some of the rules are easier to use than others. For the rest, it might just be simpler to actually divide.
Here is a look at the rules for 3, 6, and 9.
The Rule for 3: A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.
What does this mean? This means that we need to add up the digits in the number and see of the answer is can be divided by 3 without a remainder.
Example: 34,911
Step 1: Add up the digits. 3 + 4 + 9 + 1 + 1 = 18
Step 2: Determine if 3 divides evenly into the sum of 18. Yes, 3 x 6 = 18. So 3 goes evenly into 18.
Step 3: Use the result to determine if 3 goes into 34,911. Because 3 divides into 18 evenly, 3 also divides evenly into 34,911. So 3 is a factor of 34,911.
Example: 45,799
Step 1: 4 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 9 = 34
Step 2: 3 does not divide evenly into 34.
Step 3: Therefore, 3 also does not divide evenly into 45,799. So 3 is not a factor of 45,799.
The Rule for 6: The prime factors of 6 are 2 and 3. So for a number to be divisible by 6, it must also be divisible by 2 and 3. Therefore, we need to check if a number is even and then check if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.
Example:23,908
Step 1: Determine if the number is even. It ends in 8, so this number is even. Therefore it is divisible by 2.
Step 2: Add the digits together. 2 + 3 + 9 + 0 + 8 = 22
Step 3: 3 does not divide evenly into 22. So this number is not divisible by 3.
Step 4: Because this number is only divisible by 2, and not by 3, it is NOT divisible by 6.
Example:154,608
Step 1: This number is even and is therefore divisible by 2.
Step 2: 1 + 5 + 4 + 6 + 0 + 8 =24
Step 3: 24 is divisible by 3 because 3 x 8 = 24.
Step 4: Because the number is divisible by 2 and 3, it is also divisible by 6.
The Rule for 9: The prime factors of 9 are 3 and 3. So we can use a very similar rule to determine if a number is divisible by 9. Basically, we will see if the sum of the digits is divisible by 9. If it is, then the actual number is also divisible by 9. This is done the same way we checked the rule for 3.
Have you ever wondered why some numbers will divide evenly (without a remainder) into a number, while others will not? The Divisibility Rules help us to determine if a number will divide into another number without actually having to divide. There is a divisibility rule for every number. However, some of the rules are easier to use than others. For the rest, it might just be simpler to actually divide.
Here is a look at the rules for 3, 6, and 9.
The Rule for 3: A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.
What does this mean? This means that we need to add up the digits in the number and see of the answer is can be divided by 3 without a remainder.
Example: 34,911
Step 1: Add up the digits. 3 + 4 + 9 + 1 + 1 = 18
Step 2: Determine if 3 divides evenly into the sum of 18. Yes, 3 x 6 = 18. So 3 goes evenly into 18.
Step 3: Use the result to determine if 3 goes into 34,911. Because 3 divides into 18 evenly, 3 also divides evenly into 34,911. So 3 is a factor of 34,911.
Example: 45,799
Step 1: 4 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 9 = 34
Step 2: 3 does not divide evenly into 34.
Step 3: Therefore, 3 also does not divide evenly into 45,799. So 3 is not a factor of 45,799.
The Rule for 6: The prime factors of 6 are 2 and 3. So for a number to be divisible by 6, it must also be divisible by 2 and 3. Therefore, we need to check if a number is even and then check if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.
Example:23,908
Step 1: Determine if the number is even. It ends in 8, so this number is even. Therefore it is divisible by 2.
Step 2: Add the digits together. 2 + 3 + 9 + 0 + 8 = 22
Step 3: 3 does not divide evenly into 22. So this number is not divisible by 3.
Step 4: Because this number is only divisible by 2, and not by 3, it is NOT divisible by 6.
Example:154,608
Step 1: This number is even and is therefore divisible by 2.
Step 2: 1 + 5 + 4 + 6 + 0 + 8 =24
Step 3: 24 is divisible by 3 because 3 x 8 = 24.
Step 4: Because the number is divisible by 2 and 3, it is also divisible by 6.
The Rule for 9: The prime factors of 9 are 3 and 3. So we can use a very similar rule to determine if a number is divisible by 9. Basically, we will see if the sum of the digits is divisible by 9. If it is, then the actual number is also divisible by 9. This is done the same way we checked the rule for 3.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests