Why Muslims stick Together
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Why Muslims stick Together
Islamic terrorism: myth and conspiracy theory build augmented reality
Sherry Sufi
The Australian
12:00AM January 2, 2018
Another day. Another terrorist. Another misdiagnosis.
We’ve long been told by “experts” that terrorism is the result of the perpetrators being mentally ill, poor, unemployed, uneducated or marginalised. Yet al-Qa’ida leader Osama bin Laden was a billionaire and Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi holds a PhD.
So much for poverty and lack of education.
Present-day Muslims, irrespective of whether they are terrorists or normal citizens, collectively subscribe to an augmented reality featuring a struggle between the imperialist forces of America, Israel and their Western allies on one side and the global community of Muslims on the other.
Blind trust in conspiracy theories does more to influence this world view than critical inquiry. No, not the “moon landing never happened” or “Elvis is still alive”- type theories. More so “the Jews, the Freemasons and the illuminati control the world” and “September 11 was an inside job to demonise Muslims”-type theories.
Romanticising over the lost glories of a once mighty Islamic empire that stretched from China to Spain remains a favourite pastime in learned Muslim circles. British and French colonialism are deeply resented for playing divide-and-conquer between Turks and Arabs in the 1920s to dismantle the Ottoman Empire, the last Islamic caliphate on earth.
European Ashkenazi Jews are begrudged for colluding with the British Empire to create Israel in 1948 in the heart of the Islamic world. Many believe the goal of Zionism is to usurp more Arab land and create “Greater Israel” stretching from the rivers Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates in Iraq.
Many similarly believe that Israel has a secret plot to demolish the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosque to rebuild the third Jewish temple over the holy site.
From the 1991 Gulf war to the 2001 war on terror in Afghanistan and the 2003 Iraq war, every case of American military intervention in Muslim nations is perceived as a “crusade” against Islam, despite each having occurred with the support of co-operating elements within those nations.
Liberating Jerusalem from the Zionists, toppling pro-American puppet regimes in Muslim nations and challenging America’s might as the world’s sole superpower are fantasies that lie at the core of this world view.
These are the exact aspirations extremist Muslims are striving hard to bring to reality by means of asymmetric warfare, otherwise known as terrorism.
When we see Muslims condemning extremist Muslims, what they’re essentially saying is that suicide bombings, stabbings, kidnappings, beheadings and mowing down pedestrians are unacceptable means to advance these aspirations.
They’re not necessarily saying the aspirations are the problem. The condemnation is directed at the means, not the end. Muslims and extremist Muslims often yearn for the same political outcomes. Except one finds an outlet in words, the other in weapons.
Islamic State publishes an online propaganda magazine called Dabiq. It contains graphic images of Muslim corpses following American drone strikes on al-Qa’ida cells in Yemen and on Taliban hideouts in Pakistan. Such images come with captions reporting more civilian deaths than those of terrorists.
The myth that American and Israeli militaries are deliberately killing Muslim civilians because they feel threatened by Islam is the single greatest driving force behind radicalisation.
Dabiq urges Muslims worldwide to fight the injustices inflicted by “the Crusaders and the Jews” by killing their civilians. This call to action appeals to some because they are already predisposed to deep-seated anti-American, anti-Zionist resentment.
The British Empire colonised both Hindus and Muslims in the Indian subcontinent for the same length of time. There are prominent Hindu anti-imperialists who believe Britain owes reparations to India, yet there is no Hindu lone wolf mowing down British pedestrians on Westminster Bridge.
America dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan during World War II, yet the Japanese haven’t set up terrorist organisations urging people to storm a gay nightclub in Florida and gun down 50 unarmed civilians trying to dance the night away.
America has a longer history of military intervention in Latin America than it does in the Middle East, yet there are no Hispanic hijackers flying planes through the World Trade Centre.
Suffice it to say the case of Muslim victimhood is exceptionally eruptive.
It is my contention that unless the myths and conspiracy theories that underpin this augmented reality are comprehensively refuted, Muslims worldwide will continue to remain susceptible to radicalisation.
For now, let’s focus on internalising the diagnosis of the problem presented in this article. As to how the associated world view may be refuted will be a subject for a future article. Stay tuned.
Sherry Sufi
The Australian
12:00AM January 2, 2018
Another day. Another terrorist. Another misdiagnosis.
We’ve long been told by “experts” that terrorism is the result of the perpetrators being mentally ill, poor, unemployed, uneducated or marginalised. Yet al-Qa’ida leader Osama bin Laden was a billionaire and Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi holds a PhD.
So much for poverty and lack of education.
Present-day Muslims, irrespective of whether they are terrorists or normal citizens, collectively subscribe to an augmented reality featuring a struggle between the imperialist forces of America, Israel and their Western allies on one side and the global community of Muslims on the other.
Blind trust in conspiracy theories does more to influence this world view than critical inquiry. No, not the “moon landing never happened” or “Elvis is still alive”- type theories. More so “the Jews, the Freemasons and the illuminati control the world” and “September 11 was an inside job to demonise Muslims”-type theories.
Romanticising over the lost glories of a once mighty Islamic empire that stretched from China to Spain remains a favourite pastime in learned Muslim circles. British and French colonialism are deeply resented for playing divide-and-conquer between Turks and Arabs in the 1920s to dismantle the Ottoman Empire, the last Islamic caliphate on earth.
European Ashkenazi Jews are begrudged for colluding with the British Empire to create Israel in 1948 in the heart of the Islamic world. Many believe the goal of Zionism is to usurp more Arab land and create “Greater Israel” stretching from the rivers Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates in Iraq.
Many similarly believe that Israel has a secret plot to demolish the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosque to rebuild the third Jewish temple over the holy site.
From the 1991 Gulf war to the 2001 war on terror in Afghanistan and the 2003 Iraq war, every case of American military intervention in Muslim nations is perceived as a “crusade” against Islam, despite each having occurred with the support of co-operating elements within those nations.
Liberating Jerusalem from the Zionists, toppling pro-American puppet regimes in Muslim nations and challenging America’s might as the world’s sole superpower are fantasies that lie at the core of this world view.
These are the exact aspirations extremist Muslims are striving hard to bring to reality by means of asymmetric warfare, otherwise known as terrorism.
When we see Muslims condemning extremist Muslims, what they’re essentially saying is that suicide bombings, stabbings, kidnappings, beheadings and mowing down pedestrians are unacceptable means to advance these aspirations.
They’re not necessarily saying the aspirations are the problem. The condemnation is directed at the means, not the end. Muslims and extremist Muslims often yearn for the same political outcomes. Except one finds an outlet in words, the other in weapons.
Islamic State publishes an online propaganda magazine called Dabiq. It contains graphic images of Muslim corpses following American drone strikes on al-Qa’ida cells in Yemen and on Taliban hideouts in Pakistan. Such images come with captions reporting more civilian deaths than those of terrorists.
The myth that American and Israeli militaries are deliberately killing Muslim civilians because they feel threatened by Islam is the single greatest driving force behind radicalisation.
Dabiq urges Muslims worldwide to fight the injustices inflicted by “the Crusaders and the Jews” by killing their civilians. This call to action appeals to some because they are already predisposed to deep-seated anti-American, anti-Zionist resentment.
The British Empire colonised both Hindus and Muslims in the Indian subcontinent for the same length of time. There are prominent Hindu anti-imperialists who believe Britain owes reparations to India, yet there is no Hindu lone wolf mowing down British pedestrians on Westminster Bridge.
America dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan during World War II, yet the Japanese haven’t set up terrorist organisations urging people to storm a gay nightclub in Florida and gun down 50 unarmed civilians trying to dance the night away.
America has a longer history of military intervention in Latin America than it does in the Middle East, yet there are no Hispanic hijackers flying planes through the World Trade Centre.
Suffice it to say the case of Muslim victimhood is exceptionally eruptive.
It is my contention that unless the myths and conspiracy theories that underpin this augmented reality are comprehensively refuted, Muslims worldwide will continue to remain susceptible to radicalisation.
For now, let’s focus on internalising the diagnosis of the problem presented in this article. As to how the associated world view may be refuted will be a subject for a future article. Stay tuned.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
You know that was a good article... the lack of interest is rather disappointing.
Apparently this guy was going to run for the Libs in WA.
Was wondering how they take to him over there.
Apparently this guy was going to run for the Libs in WA.
Was wondering how they take to him over there.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
Forgive my superficiality, but I didn't even bother to read that article. I'm just posting to invalidate the title.
Muslims don't stick together. Wahabi Sunni Muslims kill other Sunni Muslims. Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims kill each other every day.
Sufis allowed their religion to be absorbed into Shia Islam to avoid extermination, but other Muslims still kill them quite regularly.
Islam started as a protest movement against Eastern Orthodox Christianity just like Protestantism began as a protest movement against Catholicism,
and is no less fractured with its plethora of competing sects than Christianity, but is considerably more socially retarded than Christianity.
The Age of Pisces (where the dominant religion is represented by a fish - Christianity) finished in 2012. It'll probably be a couple of centuries before the religions of the book (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) claiming ancestral divinity from Abraham die out completely, but their time is up/over as the spiritual guides of humanity. In their death throws they'll squabble, compete and become ever more perverted in desperate attemps to remain relevant.
What new form of spiritual concepts emerges in the Age of Aquarius is any one's guess. So I don't know if those with a need for existential beliefs will worship rain gods or we have to bow down to privatised water companies or what, but what whatever it is, it will be something to do with water.
Muslims don't stick together. Wahabi Sunni Muslims kill other Sunni Muslims. Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims kill each other every day.
Sufis allowed their religion to be absorbed into Shia Islam to avoid extermination, but other Muslims still kill them quite regularly.
Islam started as a protest movement against Eastern Orthodox Christianity just like Protestantism began as a protest movement against Catholicism,
and is no less fractured with its plethora of competing sects than Christianity, but is considerably more socially retarded than Christianity.
The Age of Pisces (where the dominant religion is represented by a fish - Christianity) finished in 2012. It'll probably be a couple of centuries before the religions of the book (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) claiming ancestral divinity from Abraham die out completely, but their time is up/over as the spiritual guides of humanity. In their death throws they'll squabble, compete and become ever more perverted in desperate attemps to remain relevant.
What new form of spiritual concepts emerges in the Age of Aquarius is any one's guess. So I don't know if those with a need for existential beliefs will worship rain gods or we have to bow down to privatised water companies or what, but what whatever it is, it will be something to do with water.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
LOL
Thanks for that.
but it would appear you should have actually read the article.
The actual title of which is...
Islamic terrorism: myth and conspiracy theory build augmented reality
So no refutation as yet.
oh and Muslims do stick together.
As Muslims they stick to their particular brand and would kill any variation off.
But also as Muslims they would kill the rest of us non-Muslims off first.
Sherry was attacked this week by various LW Prog groups... he must have said something right.
Thanks for that.
but it would appear you should have actually read the article.
The actual title of which is...
Islamic terrorism: myth and conspiracy theory build augmented reality
So no refutation as yet.
oh and Muslims do stick together.
As Muslims they stick to their particular brand and would kill any variation off.
But also as Muslims they would kill the rest of us non-Muslims off first.
Sherry was attacked this week by various LW Prog groups... he must have said something right.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
What's so funny? ... fake laugh is my guess .. but anyway, I assume you're scoffing at the Age of Pisces ending/Age of Aquarius beginning theme ... well the Precession of the Equinoxes aka Axial Precession is accepted as scientific reality ... and what's more has been known of/about since ancient times. In short it states our solar system does a 25,980 year elliptic orbit around our galaxy (Milky Way), and just shy of every 13,000 years as we pass closer to the centre of our galaxy we are exposed to increased levels of planet and star forming cosmic explosion generated cosmic radiation.Rorschach wrote:LOL
During which time our planet is subject to greater levels of catastrophism ... it's also a very rational explanation for global warming and cooling, plus increased volcanism, tectonic and seismic shifts.
No worries.Rorschach wrote:Thanks for that.
Well, I might have if you hadn't butchered it with enlarged print scattered through it.Rorschach wrote:but it would appear you should have actually read the article.
Apparently so re article title, but I was invalidating the thread title, regardless of who coined it.Rorschach wrote:The actual title of which is...
Islamic terrorism: myth and conspiracy theory build augmented reality
So no refutation as yet.
Is that so?Rorschach wrote:oh and Muslims do stick together.
As Muslims they stick to their particular brand and would kill any variation off.
But also as Muslims they would kill the rest of us non-Muslims off first.
Well an Afgan Shi'ite who came into one of my father's factories reckoned that Sunnis (eg Taliban) would kill a Shi'ite before they'd kill a Jew.
And remember Sydney Lindt Cafe siege perpetrator Man Haron Monis?
Well he was Iranian, a Shi'ite, and when in Long Bay Gaol Remand Centre prior to his proclamation of support for Islamic State, Lebanese Sunni Muslims bashed and covered him with human excretia.
That's not what I'd perceive as "sticking together".
Probably, but the Left are phuked in the head and always looking for an excuse to have a hissy fit anyway, so nothing special.Rorschach wrote:Sherry was attacked this week by various LW Prog groups... he must have said something right.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:36 am
- FLEKTARN
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:46 pm
- Location: Varna / Salzburg
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
Muslims in Bulgaria don't usually stick together. So I'd say it's a cultural thing. Muslims in Turkey/Germany/Netherlands are fanatics for example. It's a parasitic behaviour. They take other countries and make them theirs, retarded like their original lands were.
Photo from Germany, not Turkey.
Photo from Germany, not Turkey.
The one that says the least can often have a very different perspective and hold the answer. The least qualified person may hold the most wisdom. When you don’t have knowledge or experience blocking your perspective, you can see problems and solutions.
- Valkie
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
Muzzos stick together for one simple reason.
EVERYONE ELSE DISTRUSTS AND HATES THEM.
Simple fact, and they bring it on themselves.
Another fact
Muzzos hate other muzzos.
They kill each other more than they kill others
It's a truly sick cult of death.
EVERYONE ELSE DISTRUSTS AND HATES THEM.
Simple fact, and they bring it on themselves.
Another fact
Muzzos hate other muzzos.
They kill each other more than they kill others
It's a truly sick cult of death.
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
Rorschach wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:00 amIslamic terrorism: myth and conspiracy theory build augmented reality
Sherry Sufi
The Australian
12:00AM January 2, 2018
Another day. Another terrorist. Another misdiagnosis.
We’ve long been told by “experts” that terrorism is the result of the perpetrators being mentally ill, poor, unemployed, uneducated or marginalised. Yet al-Qa’ida leader Osama bin Laden was a billionaire and Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi holds a PhD.
So much for poverty and lack of education.
Present-day Muslims, irrespective of whether they are terrorists or normal citizens, collectively subscribe to an augmented reality featuring a struggle between the imperialist forces of America, Israel and their Western allies on one side and the global community of Muslims on the other.
Blind trust in conspiracy theories does more to influence this world view than critical inquiry. No, not the “moon landing never happened” or “Elvis is still alive”- type theories. More so “the Jews, the Freemasons and the illuminati control the world” and “September 11 was an inside job to demonise Muslims”-type theories.
Romanticising over the lost glories of a once mighty Islamic empire that stretched from China to Spain remains a favourite pastime in learned Muslim circles. British and French colonialism are deeply resented for playing divide-and-conquer between Turks and Arabs in the 1920s to dismantle the Ottoman Empire, the last Islamic caliphate on earth.
European Ashkenazi Jews are begrudged for colluding with the British Empire to create Israel in 1948 in the heart of the Islamic world. Many believe the goal of Zionism is to usurp more Arab land and create “Greater Israel” stretching from the rivers Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates in Iraq.
Many similarly believe that Israel has a secret plot to demolish the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosque to rebuild the third Jewish temple over the holy site.
From the 1991 Gulf war to the 2001 war on terror in Afghanistan and the 2003 Iraq war, every case of American military intervention in Muslim nations is perceived as a “crusade” against Islam, despite each having occurred with the support of co-operating elements within those nations.
Liberating Jerusalem from the Zionists, toppling pro-American puppet regimes in Muslim nations and challenging America’s might as the world’s sole superpower are fantasies that lie at the core of this world view.
These are the exact aspirations extremist Muslims are striving hard to bring to reality by means of asymmetric warfare, otherwise known as terrorism.
When we see Muslims condemning extremist Muslims, what they’re essentially saying is that suicide bombings, stabbings, kidnappings, beheadings and mowing down pedestrians are unacceptable means to advance these aspirations.
They’re not necessarily saying the aspirations are the problem. The condemnation is directed at the means, not the end. Muslims and extremist Muslims often yearn for the same political outcomes. Except one finds an outlet in words, the other in weapons.
Islamic State publishes an online propaganda magazine called Dabiq. It contains graphic images of Muslim corpses following American drone strikes on al-Qa’ida cells in Yemen and on Taliban hideouts in Pakistan. Such images come with captions reporting more civilian deaths than those of terrorists.
The myth that American and Israeli militaries are deliberately killing Muslim civilians because they feel threatened by Islam is the single greatest driving force behind radicalisation.
Dabiq urges Muslims worldwide to fight the injustices inflicted by “the Crusaders and the Jews” by killing their civilians. This call to action appeals to some because they are already predisposed to deep-seated anti-American, anti-Zionist resentment.
The British Empire colonised both Hindus and Muslims in the Indian subcontinent for the same length of time. There are prominent Hindu anti-imperialists who believe Britain owes reparations to India, yet there is no Hindu lone wolf mowing down British pedestrians on Westminster Bridge.
America dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan during World War II, yet the Japanese haven’t set up terrorist organisations urging people to storm a gay nightclub in Florida and gun down 50 unarmed civilians trying to dance the night away.
America has a longer history of military intervention in Latin America than it does in the Middle East, yet there are no Hispanic hijackers flying planes through the World Trade Centre.
Suffice it to say the case of Muslim victimhood is exceptionally eruptive.
It is my contention that unless the myths and conspiracy theories that underpin this augmented reality are comprehensively refuted, Muslims worldwide will continue to remain susceptible to radicalisation.
For now, let’s focus on internalising the diagnosis of the problem presented in this article. As to how the associated world view may be refuted will be a subject for a future article. Stay tuned.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- FLEKTARN
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:46 pm
- Location: Varna / Salzburg
Re: Why Muslims stick Together
That's correct, sir. Actually, India is the rape capital of the world, not Sweden. Muslims and even Buddhists in India rape like nuts.
The one that says the least can often have a very different perspective and hold the answer. The least qualified person may hold the most wisdom. When you don’t have knowledge or experience blocking your perspective, you can see problems and solutions.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests