You are the one who brought up the UN building in New York, Cods, not me.cods wrote: ↑Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:00 pmyou nit pick about trivia brian......its the COST the ANNUAL COST of the UN that is outrageous.for what they do... they do NOTHING thats of note....not a bloody thing....dont you get that you go into all the historyonics ...that was THEN this is NOW.. things have changed a hell of a lot they are past their use by date if they ever had a date....useless....to b e honest if we were even in conflict I doubt anyone of us would say its OK ever fear the UN will save us.,..brian ross wrote: ↑Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:28 pmEssentially the individual members' and hence the World's, Cods.
The UN is a collective security agency.
I am unsure why people are so worried about China's island grab in the South China Sea. China is very vulnerable to economic sanctions. All that is needed is for the West to redirect it's investments away from China to say, India. China relies on important raw materials and exported manufactured goods. If they have no source and no market, guess what happens to the Chinese economy?
Again, as I keep pointing out, the UN has basically no power. It is a clearing house for the member states. If the member states don't want to talk about something, that something doesn't come up for discussion. It is much easier to rant about Iran than address poverty in say, Columbia or Brazil. It is easier to rant about Israel than address female inequality in say, India.Brian there is far too much starvation inequality female abuse going on all over this planet and the UN has done not a thing...
The UN does not actually own the building in New York, Cods. It is held in a trust, granted by the US Government from a donation by John D. Rockefeller.it neither stops nor chastises those responsible......a toothless tiger and very very wealthy one at that have you seen the UN BUILDING IN N.Y.
and thats just the tip of the iceberg.
I have explained, extensively, about the powers of the UN. If you wish to dispute them, take it up with the Australian Federal Government is what I would suggest. Oh, and the word is "histrionics". Things have changed, I agree but unless you know how the UN was formed you won't understand how it has got to what it is. You know, I read an article about 20 years ago which pointed out that the 1990s were generally the most successful decade the UN had ever had - it had ended more conflicts, fed more people, gotten rid of Smallpox, etc. It is interesting how short the memories of some people are.
The buildings in New York are one of three complexes that the UN owns. The others are in Geneva and Nairobi. All are paid for by the dues paid by the member states. You want to be a member, you have to pay, Cods.as for the building in NY its not the only one you know and the cost of running that building would b e hugmendous...electricity alone... so much for the planet... gotta keep the UN building warm and cosy..
I am basically a historian, Cods. If you don't understand the past, you'll never understand the present. Your problem is that you are ignorant of the past. You have no desire to learn about it and so you continually cuss the present, being unable to understand how it was created.you live in the past a bit brian.. always quoting history for what its worth.....this fat cow has just got fatter as far as I am concerned......and we dont need it..... you may but I dont