Gun control laws

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Gun control laws

Post by boxy » Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:56 pm

Suuuurrre...
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Gun control laws

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:19 pm

boxy wrote:
Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:56 pm
Suuuurrre...
On the slim chance that your disbelief is genuine ... I suggest you ask admin if you can view the material I sent Brisbane Bayside (Wynnum) CIB and posted here in Oct or Nov 2016 in a thread titled 'Scumbag Watch II' when the piece of shit mentioned poisoned my bitch Gemma, lest FD have another panic mode if I repost it.

Now to what I actually think of your reply.
I've noticed that when you Fabian queers are confronted with a reality countering your desired fantasy, that you can't come up with an answer for, you feign disbelief.

Y'see I reckon anti-gunners are anti human in the same way vegetarians are anti nature.
In Veg-nazi culture the rabbit and deer are the good guys (victims) and the wolf is the bad guy (predator).
Well like it or not Earth is a violent place and predation is part of nature, so if meat eaters are bad, vegetarians are anti nature.

Pretty much all life forms on this planet have defence mechanisms because they live in a violent world
A virus mutates to survive. Plants have poisons or thorns ect. Some animals have speed and/or agility and others in built weapons like horns, tusks or claws.
Humans were gifted with creativity and dexterity to fashion their own weapons from the resources around them.
Fire arms are just part of that evolution of defence mechanisms. Thus anti-gunners are anti human.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: Gun control laws

Post by brian ross » Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:46 pm

You are aware, I hope, that the consumption of grain, over meat is actually healthier? Humans are omnivores, not carnivores, tnerefore, while we can eat meat we are not totally dependent upon it's consumption. Firearms are tools and are not required for our day-to-day existence, despite what gun nuts might maintain. To suggest that vegans and anti-firearm proponents are "sub-humans" is foolish in extremis IMO.
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
BigP
Posts: 4970
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm

Re: Gun control laws

Post by BigP » Fri Sep 21, 2018 7:39 pm

brian ross wrote:
Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:46 pm
You are aware, I hope, that the consumption of grain, over meat is actually healthier? Humans are omnivores, not carnivores, tnerefore, while we can eat meat we are not totally dependent upon it's consumption. Firearms are tools and are not required for our day-to-day existence, despite what gun nuts might maintain. To suggest that vegans and anti-firearm proponents are "sub-humans" is foolish in extremis IMO.

""Firearms are tools and are not required for our day-to-day existence,""

They certainly make a day more enjoyable

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Gun control laws

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:00 pm

brian ross wrote:
Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:46 pm
You are aware, I hope, that the consumption of grain, over meat is actually healthier? Humans are omnivores, not carnivores, tnerefore, while we can eat meat we are not totally dependent upon it's consumption. Firearms are tools and are not required for our day-to-day existence, despite what gun nuts might maintain. To suggest that vegans and anti-firearm proponents are "sub-humans" is foolish in extremis IMO.
the consumption of grain, over meat is actually healthier?
Veg-nazi myth.
Grain has virtually no nutrient, that's why vegetarians are physically weak and mentally fucked up.
No iron, zinc, iodine and B group vitamins makes a homo sapiens sub human.
Claw hammers and B double trucks are tools that faggy arse commies like you don't need to access welfare payments, should we prohibit them too?
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
FLEKTARN
Posts: 1525
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:46 pm
Location: Varna / Salzburg

Re: Gun control laws

Post by FLEKTARN » Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:30 am

Black Orchid wrote:
Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:52 pm
Never a day goes by without some kind of shooting in Aus. Usually Sydney or somewhere in QLD. We keep wrongly patting ourselves on the back whilst the criminals run rampant with their numerous fire arms.
WHENEVER there is a mass shooting in America, the Australian gun control laws are held up as an example of a 'successful' model, based on the fact there have not been any massacres in Australia since their implementation.

There is also the usual kneejerk reaction here with suggestions of the need to tighten Australian laws.

The fact is that Australian gun control laws are a joke.

Fact 1: Australia does not have a gun culture as in the US. The only private firearms owners are 'recreational' shooters and on rural properties to protect stock from feral pests.

Fact 2: Australia does not have a history of gun massacres - Port Arthur was a 'one off' - so the gun laws implemented in response to that tragic event cannot be credited with prevention of any mass shootings since.

Fact 3: The gun control laws apply only to law-abiding owners who are required to register firearms and abide by regulations that make ownership more expensive.

Fact 4: Criminals and terrorists are exempt from these laws and can easily acquire any firearms of their choice via the internet, so there are now more gun-related crimes than before the controls.

Fact 5: Proposed solutions to gun-related crimes always involve tightening controls on law-abiding owners of registered firearms, which do not affect criminals and terrorists.
https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/n ... re-replies

1. You're a woman
2. You're against gun-control
3. You actually support men and understand they have a soul too and are often oppressed
4. You are against criminals, illegal invaders and country-welfare-freebie shoppers

Wow. Tell your husband/boyfriend if you have, that you deserve a dinner on candles now! Immediately! I rarely say this, actually just the opposite, so mark these words.

Image
The one that says the least can often have a very different perspective and hold the answer. The least qualified person may hold the most wisdom. When you don’t have knowledge or experience blocking your perspective, you can see problems and solutions.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests