Ransom

Aussie · Post by **Aussie** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:43 pm

Well, when boxy finds it, "we" will all know who the tool is.

boxy · Post by **boxy** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:44 pm

Aussie wrote:I don't mind looking like a tool...

Well, there's yer problem, right there...

Aussie · Post by **Aussie** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:53 pm

C'marn boxy, looks are only skin deep. Now, go find that thaing. In the very same interview, Dick made a comment about being told by a politician that not to pay means/= hostage dies.

It is there in ABC AM/FM radio ether.

boxy · Post by **boxy** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:21 pm

Can't find it, Aussie, yer on yer own.

Holy shit... just seen the latest news releases, giving the POV of Dick and Bob... pathetic. The govt stance has to be... HAS TO BE... no ransom payments, yet that's all they've got. That the govt failed to pay the ransom 11 months ago.

What the govt should have been looking at (no doubt was looking at) was a military alternative. I doubt we're up to it...

boxy · Post by **boxy** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:23 pm

Particularly pathetic was Bob Browns soundbite, about it only being a fraction of his parliamentary pay... please. Hippy.

Aussie · Post by **Aussie** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:37 pm

boxy wrote:Can't find it, Aussie, yer on yer own.

Holy shit... just seen the latest news releases, giving the POV of Dick and Bob... pathetic. The govt stance has to be... HAS TO BE... no ransom payments, yet that's all they've got. That the govt failed to pay the ransom 11 months ago.

What the govt should have been looking at (no doubt was looking at) was a military alternative. I doubt we're up to it...

The government stance was....no ransom.............but someone paid $35,000 paid per month to these 'hostage negotiators.'

Now, I agree that Government cannot be seen publicly as paying a ransom, but I am completely confident that Government is very capable of filtering funds surreptitiously to appropriate, and very credible fronts like Dick and Bob, and they are also very capable of keeping tags on the money, and thus locating the fuckers so that the SAS can aim at that very skinny black arse for the successful delivery of a nasty bugger from space.

Just ^^^^ a fanciful notion I have.

boxy · Post by **boxy** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:44 pm

USA ---->
CIA ---->

JW.Frogen · Post by **JW.Frogen** » Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:34 pm

Actually wouldn't the USA be that way ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

freediver · Post by **freediver** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:29 pm

Now, I agree that Government cannot be seen publicly as paying a ransom, but I am completely confident that Government is very capable of filtering funds surreptitiously to appropriate, and very credible fronts like Dick and Bob, and they are also very capable of keeping tags on the money, and thus locating the fuckers so that the SAS can aim at that very skinny black arse for the successful delivery of a nasty bugger from space.

That's what the negotiators are for - to prevent the government following the money. It's gone now, being used to buy assault rifles for some cruel wannabe dictator, and Dick the hero helped it happen. Now we have to stay away, so these lunatics can slaughter the locals without any rich white people to write it down. Maybe Dick got a discount for discouraging journalists from going in there.

Aussie · Post by **Aussie** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:57 pm

That's what the negotiators are for - to prevent the government following the money.

How do you know that? Got any evidence at all?

Political Animal

Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Re: Ransom

Who is online