Intervention changes

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Auzgurl

Re: Intervention changes

Post by Auzgurl » Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:40 pm

JW.Frogen wrote:I love the smell napalm in the morning.

a well known saying, but what does napalm smell like ?

Do you carry a gun Frogen ( I saw that in another thread )

Auzgurl

Re: Intervention changes

Post by Auzgurl » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:11 pm

In my mind perhaps the one good thing Howard ever did, even tho his primary purpose was not saving the Aborigine but more his own Political neck...

Funny how things work out sometimes , and doesnt matter so much about the how, just as long as it does.

Intervention is the only thing the Aborigine understands and responds to, its all he knows, it goes back to Colonisation .

That is a very sad fact.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Intervention changes

Post by boxy » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:23 pm

Do you really think that Howard approved this "intervention" for populist reasons?

This type of thing, where you have to suspend the racial discrimination act, would obviously not be popular in our current "enlightened" society. Only an inept politician would do it for superficial reasons.

If you want to keep the "abo" down, you keep serving up the grog. If you want to try to help, without regard for political correctness, you say, "no more grog for you".
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Auzgurl

Re: Intervention changes

Post by Auzgurl » Tue Nov 24, 2009 12:32 am

Do you really think that Howard approved this "intervention" for populist reasons?
yes

And yes I firmly believe he was totally inept in matters of Social Policy.
If you think for one minute he launched the intervention for any reason other then the fact he was destitute, and pratically dead rotten and forgotten in the electorate, then I cannot agree with you.

Your analogy is simplistic boxy, and as its very late here ( DLS) I'm off to bed I'll ponder this further tomorrow.

:arrow:

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Intervention changes

Post by boxy » Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:36 pm

Wow... something seems to be working, and it was introduced because the leader of the moment was 'politically destitute'.

Perhaps we should put more people into positions of power, and give them no way back...
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
JW.Frogen
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:14 am

Re: Intervention changes

Post by JW.Frogen » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:19 am

His far more successful policy against people smuggling worked too. But that is because he was racist, we all know that?

Howard, he was such a bad evil man, I am glad he is gone becuase he seemed to do things that usually worked.

I hate things that work.

I hate work.
DEEEEEEEEPTHOUGHT IS EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!

Rainbow Moonlight
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm

Re: Intervention changes

Post by Rainbow Moonlight » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:12 pm

How do you know it worked? If he caught less people trying to come in then maybe that is because MORE people actually got in illegally. I think his gun laws were his crowning (though very early) achievement. I would expect conservatives to think highly of the introduction of the GST. A few of the bad things he did I think include measures he took with welfare restriction that were in my view just mean - too numerous to recall them all- the decision to take us into Iraq with Bush, and the failure to support farmers soon enough in very hard hitting drought.

Auzgurl

Re: Intervention changes

Post by Auzgurl » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:37 pm

Can you say that the intervention worked after such a short period of time, I dont think so..It will take quite a few years of successive Govts actually sustaining and committing to this very long term plan.

Gun laws actually havent achieved much either, there are still an awful lot of guns in the community, still a lot of shootings etc , and still relatively easy to aquire a license even now , I have inquired. A friend of mine has about 4 firearms in his possession, he doesnt use them .

So it takes some time to see these Policies show their worth,and so it will be with the NT Intervention..

User avatar
JW.Frogen
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:14 am

Re: Intervention changes

Post by JW.Frogen » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:54 pm

Rainbow Moonlight wrote:How do you know it worked? If he caught less people trying to come in then maybe that is because MORE people actually got in illegally. I think his gun laws were his crowning (though very early) achievement. I would expect conservatives to think highly of the introduction of the GST. A few of the bad things he did I think include measures he took with welfare restriction that were in my view just mean - too numerous to recall them all- the decision to take us into Iraq with Bush, and the failure to support farmers soon enough in very hard hitting drought.
I don't think there is any serious thought that under Howard people smugglers got a lot of people into this country without us knowing it, we do not the tide is increasing to our shores however since Labor dumped his policy.
DEEEEEEEEPTHOUGHT IS EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!

Rainbow Moonlight
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm

Re: Intervention changes

Post by Rainbow Moonlight » Thu Nov 26, 2009 8:08 am

Maybe Howard just controlled the information we got or didn't go looking for illegal boats. It would be easy using those methods to manufacture an apparent decrease in numbers wouldn't it? I don't think there is anyway of knowing for sure.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests