Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:27 pm
Gordon wrote:I'm not pro death penalty for the simple reason you have people like no friends Nellie in the legal system. I have zero problem with people hunting down and killing pedos who've harmed their family members.
Pedos actually do collaborate and cover for each other. I went to a boarding school and was never abused, but was groomed and probably not far from it happening.
Agreed.
Another option is microchip and track them via GPS. House arrest. Intra-net no access to the www and keep them the hell away from society.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Post
by Black Orchid » Fri May 04, 2018 1:38 pm
Black Orchid wrote:Actress Tina Malone may face jail time after sharing an alleged image of Jon Venables.
Malone retweeted an image on Twitter, which claimed to reveal the new identity of James Bulger’s murderer along with his alleged girlfriend.
The TV actress may have committed a crime against Venables' lifelong anonymity order, which was made in 1993 when he was incarcerated along with Robert Thompson for Bulger’s torture and murder.
Before their custody release, a court ruled that Venables’ and Thompson’s identities should remain secret for the rest of their lives.
Such an order means no one can ever post or publish photos that claim to identify either one of the killers – whether true or not.
As a result, Malone is under police investigation after retweeting the offending photo to her thousands of followers and possibly uncovering Venables’ secret identity.
While Malone admitted that she retweeted the image, the star maintained she had no idea she was breaking the law.
"What are you going to do... prosecute me for posting a picture? I didn’t realise.
"I am not au fait with the law."
The penalty for breaching an anonymity order can result in a two-year prison sentence.
Venables is currently back in jail after being found in possession of child sex abuse images.
Given his past crime, he is a wanted man among fellow inmates and has been attacked in prison previously, after his identity became known.
Since 1993, it is thought that Venables has received at least four new identities at the cost of around £1 million (AUD $1.76 million) of taxpayer’s money and reportedly cost the public £5 million (AUD $8.8 million) in efforts to reintegrate him into society.
This latest incident could see Venables receive another new identity.
https://honey.nine.com.au/2018/03/12/12 ... n-venables
Taxpayers have spent over $10 million to protect this little flea and sharing his photo can put you in jail for 2 years. Why should his identity remain secret for life? Especially when he keeps re-offending.
I know it isn't a nice thing to say but I really hope he gets what he deserves while he is behind bars this time. He will never reintegrate and spending more millions of dollars is a total waste.
Good to know that this serial offender may be exposed. It is a disgrace that he is protected after so many offences.
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Fri May 04, 2018 5:21 pm
Gotta ask how sick is our society is whereby it protects offenders and targets victims or child rites activists who expose them.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Post
by Neferti » Tue May 22, 2018 1:55 pm
Archbishop of Adelaide Philip Wilson found guilty of covering up child sexual abuse
The most senior Catholic to be charged with concealing child sexual abuse — Adelaide's Archbishop Philip Wilson — has been found guilty by a New South Wales court, in a landmark ruling.
Key points:
Wilson concealed child sexual abuse by a fellow priest in the 1970s
He was assistant parish priest in East Maitland, NSW, at the time
He could face up to two years in jail
The 67-year-old was accused of covering up abuse by priest Jim Fletcher in the NSW Hunter region in the 1970s.
As part of his defence, Wilson's legal team tried to argue that as child sexual abuse was not considered a serious crime in the 1970s, it was not worthy of being reported to authorities.
However, Magistrate Robert Stone cast that claim aside in a ruling that could have ramifications in courts around the country.
Speaking outside court, abuse survivor Peter Gogarty said the verdict was "one of the most significant days in criminal law in Australian history".
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-22/a ... se/9783612
What gets me is that the word "abuse" seems to have been toned down due to PC. RAPING children (or adults for that matter) is not just the soft tone of "abuse", it is an ADULT taking advantage of a CHILD (or female) and those who do it, or even think of doing it, should be treated as ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING CREATURES and treated appropriately ... housed together, perhaps, and a few "bombs" dropped there upon, accidentally, obviously.
Or Frontal Lobotomies for all or them, on Medicare.
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Tue May 22, 2018 3:02 pm
Satanic paedophile network allegedly exposed in Australia.
Some of those allegedly involved are as follows according to this victims account.
Paul Keating, Bob Hawke,Beasley Sr, even Jacki Weaver.
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom ... australia/
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Tue May 22, 2018 3:05 pm
Royal commission into child sex abuse needs to extend beyond religious groups.
Without a doubt.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Tue May 22, 2018 5:17 pm
Interesting to note the alleged perpetrators involved in the ritual abuse of children were predominantly Labor politicians and of the left political persuasion.
They must feel pretty entitled hu.
Entitled to destroy lives that have barely started.
Great ethic there.
So much for the compassionate left.
Not that we didn't know this already.
Filthy wretched old self entitled warts.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Tue May 22, 2018 10:14 pm
mellie wrote:
Interesting to note the alleged perpetrators involved in the ritual abuse of children were predominantly Labor politicians and of the left political persuasion.
They must feel pretty entitled hu.
Entitled to destroy lives that have barely started.
Great ethic there.
So much for the compassionate left.
Not that we didn't know this already.
Filthy wretched old self entitled warts.
ABC seem almost too keen to dismiss her claims. Whilst the ABC argue Fiona Barrett has zero evidence to substantiate her claims, I argue why haven't any of those named taken action against this woman for defamation?
I remain neutral....
For now.
Some of her claims appear outrageous, psychotic even... however what I find more outrageous is how not a single accused individual has attempted to call her on this or has initiated legal proceedings.
The fact that the ABC are left and feminist is another point of interest concerning their opinion of her as an individual.
ABC shut down public debate about this quite quickly too, not that this is unusual for the ABC, but their sudden lack of regard for those claiming to have experienced sexual abuse, proven or not, real or imagined is rather out of character for them.
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transc ... 343957.htm
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
mellie
- Posts: 10231
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Post
by mellie » Tue May 22, 2018 10:30 pm
If Fiona is genuine, she's likely to accept a payout rather than live in fear of harm coming to herself or family anyway and we'll never hear another thing about it.
Assuming she's genuine and sane.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Post
by Black Orchid » Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:35 pm
A plan to increase jail time for repeated child sex abusers and new offences for failing to report child abuse have been introduced into NSW parliament.
The state government on Wednesday put forward a suite of measures recommended by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that it hopes will make sure perpetrators are held to account.
Under the changes, persistent child sex abusers will face a maximum life sentence and new offences will apply for a failure to report or protect against child abuse.
If passed, courts will not take into account an offender's good character when sentencing for historical offences and the sentences will reflect an understanding of the lifelong trauma sexual abuse can cause.
The proposed laws will also create a new offence of grooming an adult to access a child and will strengthen the current grooming offence to include giving a child gifts or money.
The bill follows NSW's decision to opt-in to the national redress scheme to support survivors of institutional child sexual abuse.
NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman praised the courageous survivors who, in telling their stories, have helped make history.
"They are changing the way our laws respond to child sex abuse," he said in a statement.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw-getting-t ... --spt.html
Good character for historical offences? Is that how sentencing is gauged? Does this mean that currently if a perpetrator has been undetected since his last child abuse crime he gets kudos? That's just shocking!
Expanding the current grooming laws to include giving children gifts and/or money sounds like a slippery slope too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests