To be biased is correct

[Nom De Plume]

Dont buy it Brian, Racism is a natural defencive responce to protecting ones family and territory ,,

If it is "natural" why then do when new tribes/peoples are first contacted by White people, they are invariably welcomed, accepted? Be it in North America, South America, Oceania, Africa. People generally accept other people when they first encounter them. "Racism" is a learned response. It comes out of fear of them after their actions.

The ones in the amazon recently, fired arrows at the chopper as if flew over, Not sure where your fantasy originated lol

He has the noble savage delusion.

Not in the slightest. People are people but people do not react negatively to other people until the other people do something bad to them. Guess what many White People (not all though) invariably have done to the uncontacted Indigenous people after they have contacted them?

Many white people? WTF! Is that stereotyping or racism you are using to justify your claim?

[IQS.RLOW]

Perhaps your problem is that you're not technically minded enough to see the joke that it is intended to convey?

Perhaps your problem is your mind has cut off circulation to some areas after you have twisted it to try and fit your fuckwittery in it?

Let me know when you plan on making these sort of "jokes" next time you fly.
You'd be playing "Brian the funny fist puppet" on the end of an Ansell rubber glove before you could roll your eyes.

Maybe you could grow a beard and claim all the security are "Islamophobic"?

[Nicole]

@ Brian

Nicole wrote:

Of course it's a game you don't want to play Brian because you know damn straight you'd wand the young Arab if you had to choose and you can't admit that, because to do so you'd be stereotyping. And the second you admit to stereotyping I've got you by the balls.

Nicole: 1
Brian: 0

Brian replies:

Believe what you like, "Nicole". Nothing I say will change your mind, now will it? It is closed. Tsk, tsk.

Don't "tsk" at me please Brian.

As Nom pointed out, here's you stereotyping:
Brian wrote:

Guess what many White People (not all though) invariably have done to the uncontacted Indigenous people after they have contacted them?

So is it equally correct for me to say, "Many Muslims (not all though) are invariably terrorists"?

Is it also equally correct for me to say, "Many little old ladies in twin sets (not all though) are invaribly terrorists"?

Is none, one, or both of those statements correct, Brian?

[brian ross]

My "not all though" comment shows that my stereotype is limited in it's scope. Something you refuse to accept. I wonder why? Why do you hate White people so much, Mmmm?

[Black Orchid]

Most people don't mean every one of a particular culture/race on the planet Brian it is understood that they are talking about a percentage rather than a whole so there is no need to add "not all though".

You, in fact, are the one doing the stereotyping, judging and condemning by constantly asserting that they mean every last person of said race/culture when they make a comment about a particular subject of concern, thereby negating the seriousness of said offences.

[brian ross]

Most people don't mean every one of a particular culture/race on the planet Brian it is understood that they are talking about a percentage rather than a whole so there is no need to add "not all though".

You, in fact, are the one doing the stereotyping, judging and condemning by constantly asserting that they mean every last person of said race/culture when they make a comment about a particular subject of concern, thereby negating the seriousness of said offences.

BO, I only have what they have stated to go by what they mean. If they don't mean all, then why not qualify their statements? I am careful to invariably qualify my statements to show exactly what I am saying. Indeed, I have been increasingly doing that because of certain people who are lawyer like in their efforts to try and find a reverse meaning in what I am saying.

It may be obvious to you, BO but it is not obvious to me or anybody else who reads the words they have typed. Now is it?

[BigP]

Most people don't mean every one of a particular culture/race on the planet Brian it is understood that they are talking about a percentage rather than a whole so there is no need to add "not all though".

You, in fact, are the one doing the stereotyping, judging and condemning by constantly asserting that they mean every last person of said race/culture when they make a comment about a particular subject of concern, thereby negating the seriousness of said offences.

BO, I only have what they have stated to go by what they mean. If they don't mean all, then why not qualify their statements? I am careful to invariably qualify my statements to show exactly what I am saying. Indeed, I have been increasingly doing that because of certain people who are lawyer like in their efforts to try and find a reverse meaning in what I am saying.

It may be obvious to you, BO but it is not obvious to me or anybody else who reads the words they have typed. Now is it?

Brian you need to pull that bug outta yur ass

[Black Orchid]

It may be obvious to you, BO but it is not obvious to me or anybody else who reads the words they have typed. Now is it?

I would say it was obvious to most people Brian.

[Nicole]

@ Brian:

My "not all though" comment shows that my stereotype is limited in it's scope.

You just admitted to stereotyping.

Nicole wrote:

So is it equally correct for me to say, "Many Muslims (not all though) are invariably terrorists"?

Is it also equally correct for me to say, "Many little old ladies in twin sets (not all though) are invaribly terrorists"?

Is none, one, or both of those statements correct, Brian?

Please answer my question.

[IQS.RLOW]

It seems Brian's impersonation of a cockroach scuttling away while crickets chirping fill in the emptiness his cowardice leaves behind is becoming a more common occurrence...