Adoption of children by gay couples

[Black Orchid]

@ Rorschach

Schumm and the research agree with me

Who is Schumm? What is her background? Was it a latitudinal or longitudinal study? What is the sample size? What journal was her research published in? What are the limitations of the study? When was it published?

Would you ever answer so many questions?

You're full of it Nicole!

That is why referencing of quotes on sensitive topics is essential.

[Malcolm_hates_your_kids]

@ Rorschach

Schumm and the research agree with me

Who is Schumm? What is her background? Was it a latitudinal or longitudinal study? What is the sample size? What journal was her research published in? What are the limitations of the study? When was it published?

Would you ever answer so many questions?

You're full of it Nicole!

That is why referencing of quotes on sensitive topics is essential.

Lol, you're a paper trail kind of person are you?

You must be one of those annoying level 8 types stuck in your world of demanding endless paper trail otherwise you dismiss the world as irrelevant!

Why don't you pick on Mistress for a change or is that not in your job description?

[BigP]

I wish Elton John would adopt me

So youd be ok with being sodomised ?

[Nom De Plume]

Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions. If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay.

“Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.”

Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”
The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.

Dr. Whitehead believes same-sex attraction (SSA) is caused by “non-shared factors,” things happening to one twin but not the other, or a personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the other.

https://rethinkingtheology.com/2014/07/ ... s-nurture/

Bias studies from Bible Bashers count naught towards validating your premise.

[Nicole]

Here's a youtube source that explains attachment even more simply:



Note that in Bowlby's time, he focussed largely on attachment to the mother. Via longitudinal studies, it is now widely accepted that a child needs one person to whom she is securely attached - mother, father, aunt, uncle, family friend etc.

[Rorschach]

Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions. If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay.

“Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.”

Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”
The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.

Dr. Whitehead believes same-sex attraction (SSA) is caused by “non-shared factors,” things happening to one twin but not the other, or a personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the other.

https://rethinkingtheology.com/2014/07/ ... s-nurture/

Bias studies from Bible Bashers count naught towards validating your premise.

But studies from scientists and social scientists etc even if repeated by so called bible basher sites do.... I suppose all those media sites that printed it are also for naught. Grow up.

You are not going to find it on progressive or radical gay activist sites now are you?

[Nom De Plume]

Here's a youtube source that explains attachment even more simply:



Note that in Bowlby's time, he focussed largely on attachment to the mother. Via longitudinal studies, it is now widely accepted that a child needs one person to whom she is securely attached - mother, father, aunt, uncle, family friend etc.

Well supported Nicole. I would reason that a child would not notice what the principle carers sexual orientation would be, so long as it is a healthy attachment, that's all that matters.

[Rorschach]

You can ignore Schumm and his findings all you like, won't make what he found incorrect.
Attachment occurs whether you are gay or not... Attachment to gay parents will have different outcomes to those not gay in many cases as has been shown in the study you choose to ignore.

[Nicole]

@ Rorschach

But studies from scientists and social scientists etc even if repeated by so called bible basher sites do.... I suppose all those media sites that printed it are also for naught. Grow up.

Look for peer reviewed journal articles on Google scholar. Those, I would accept.

Do you know what "peer reviewed" means?

[Nicole]

Here's a youtube source that explains attachment even more simply:



Note that in Bowlby's time, he focussed largely on attachment to the mother. Via longitudinal studies, it is now widely accepted that a child needs one person to whom she is securely attached - mother, father, aunt, uncle, family friend etc.

Well supported Nicole. I would reason that a child would not notice what the principle carers sexual orientation would be, so long as it is a healthy attachment, that's all that matters.

Thank you Nom. That is my premise and it's what I believe.

What did you think of the video Rorschach? Mal?