Adoption of children by gay couples

[Black Orchid]

Personally I think gay men need to be thoroughly scrutinised before being allowed to adopt because of the few who adopt specifically looking for loopholes and easy access for their paedophilic persuasions. It might not be common but it also isn't rare. If it only happens a small number of times that is still far too many.

When the USA started legalising gay marriage many, many Canadian children protested and wrote letters to authorities against it. These children were raised in gay relationships/marriages and felt they were permanently scarred in so many ways and were absolutely dead against passing gay marriage laws. There are articles and stories all over the net by them.

If there were a panel put in place (and there definitely should be) to scutinise potential gay candidates before being allowed to adopt it should have at least one person who has been raised in a same sex relationship sitting on the panel.

[sprintcyclist]

I voted against it.

Why?

Natures law.

same sex cannot have a kid.
So, they can't have a kid,

[Nicole]

@ Orchid

Personally I think gay men need to be thoroughly scrutinised before being allowed to adopt because of the few who adopt specifically looking for loopholes and easy access for their paedophilic persuasions. It might not be common but it also isn't rare. If it only happens a small number of times that is still far too many.

The same thing happens with hetros. Is there any evidence that paedophilia is more prevelent in gay men?

When the USA started legalising gay marriage many, many Canadian children protested and wrote letters to authorities against it. These children were raised in gay relationships/marriages and felt they were permanently scarred in so many ways and were absolutely dead against passing gay marriage laws. There are articles and stories all over the net by them.

Can you link me to one?

[Nicole]

I voted against it.

Why?

Natures law.

same sex cannot have a kid.
So, they can't have a kid,

So you're against IVF too?

[sprintcyclist]

I voted against it.

Why?

Natures law.

same sex cannot have a kid.
So, they can't have a kid,

So you're against IVF too?

no

you?

[Nicole]

@ sprint

Natures law.

same sex cannot have a kid.
So, they can't have a kid,

If that is your rationale, then the same applies to IVF.

[Alinta]

Agree in principle, so voted yes.

[sprintcyclist]

@ sprint

Natures law.

same sex cannot have a kid.
So, they can't have a kid,

If that is your rationale, then the same applies to IVF.

No to homos

yes to ivf. Close to no there also

[Nicole]

But Sprint IVF couples cannot have a child naturally. You could also argue that's natures way, but you're ok with medical science "fixing" that.

You can't say gays can't raise kids because it's natures way because they can't naturally have children, but hetro's who can't have kids because it's natures way they can't have children can have a medical intervention so they can.

Your logic isn't matching up.

[Nicole]

Basically what I'm saying Sprint is you're having a bet each way.

Logically, neither gays nor IVF couples can have children. It's natures way, yeah?