Paedophiles
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
-
- Posts: 6433
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am
Re: Paedophiles
it made me sick looking at the news tonight....my son in law was here picking up his son 8yrs old and I shudder I really do..why they ever allowed this person outy I will never know he must be watched 24/7.. does it make any sense at all???....this isnt the first time he has been returned and not the first tiome he has been caught with child porn...he should not be out its that simple he is one sick dude...lock him away forever..
my heart goes out to Mrs Bulger who relives that nightmare over and over because we seem to protect monsters like this rights more than hers....
god I wish I was in charge for a day I know which laws I would throw away.
my heart goes out to Mrs Bulger who relives that nightmare over and over because we seem to protect monsters like this rights more than hers....
god I wish I was in charge for a day I know which laws I would throw away.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Paedophiles
https://honey.nine.com.au/2018/03/12/12 ... n-venablesActress Tina Malone may face jail time after sharing an alleged image of Jon Venables.
Malone retweeted an image on Twitter, which claimed to reveal the new identity of James Bulger’s murderer along with his alleged girlfriend.
The TV actress may have committed a crime against Venables' lifelong anonymity order, which was made in 1993 when he was incarcerated along with Robert Thompson for Bulger’s torture and murder.
Before their custody release, a court ruled that Venables’ and Thompson’s identities should remain secret for the rest of their lives.
Such an order means no one can ever post or publish photos that claim to identify either one of the killers – whether true or not.
As a result, Malone is under police investigation after retweeting the offending photo to her thousands of followers and possibly uncovering Venables’ secret identity.
While Malone admitted that she retweeted the image, the star maintained she had no idea she was breaking the law.
"What are you going to do... prosecute me for posting a picture? I didn’t realise.
"I am not au fait with the law."
The penalty for breaching an anonymity order can result in a two-year prison sentence.
Venables is currently back in jail after being found in possession of child sex abuse images.
Given his past crime, he is a wanted man among fellow inmates and has been attacked in prison previously, after his identity became known.
Since 1993, it is thought that Venables has received at least four new identities at the cost of around £1 million (AUD $1.76 million) of taxpayer’s money and reportedly cost the public £5 million (AUD $8.8 million) in efforts to reintegrate him into society.
This latest incident could see Venables receive another new identity.
Taxpayers have spent over $10 million to protect this little flea and sharing his photo can put you in jail for 2 years. Why should his identity remain secret for life? Especially when he keeps re-offending.
I know it isn't a nice thing to say but I really hope he gets what he deserves while he is behind bars this time. He will never reintegrate and spending more millions of dollars is a total waste.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Paedophiles
So much money is spent protecting perpetrators and not enough justice given to victims and victim's families. I think it is appalling. We follow the UK blindly with this PC rubbish and we are going down the wrong path.
We need to be more like the US.
We need to be more like the US.
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Paedophiles
Sterilising them won't do a thing to stop them Sprint. It will only stop them from reproducing and since paedophiles prefer pre-pubescent children it's not really relevant.
Castration would be useless too.
How about ... poisoning?
Castration would be useless too.
How about ... poisoning?
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Paedophiles
we have not tried sterilising to knowBlack Orchid wrote:Sterilising them won't do a thing to stop them Sprint. It will only stop them from reproducing and since paedophiles prefer pre-pubescent children it's not really relevant.
Castration would be useless too.
How about ... poisoning?
it will stop that perverted gene
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18265
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Paedophiles
Super Nova wrote:I don't agree with capital punishment because the system cam make mistakes, A mistake that cannot be fixed.
However when it is really 100%, no doubt... no beyond reasonable doubt... kill the bastards.
hang em and hang em high
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: Paedophiles
Bobby wrote:Super Nova wrote:I don't agree with capital punishment because the system cam make mistakes, A mistake that cannot be fixed.
However when it is really 100%, no doubt... no beyond reasonable doubt... kill the bastards.
hang em and hang em high
Few things are 100% perfect or foolproof. There is always some doubt
You have to go with the most likely event.
How about 97 % certain ?
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18265
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Paedophiles
Absolutely no doubt whatsoever that they did it.
Then string em up for all to see.
Then string em up for all to see.
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Paedophiles
Pedophilia is a MENTAL problem, what they need is a FRONTAL LOBOTOMY. Chopping off their balls won't stop them thinking about it ....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests