Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11787
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Super Nova » Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:53 am

dump to determinate = dump to deteriorate :-)
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Bobby » Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:55 am

For me it all depends on how they dispose of the waste.
Using a Synroc technique and burying it very deep - well below any water tables is quite safe.
see here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synroc

The greatest danger is actually the transportation of the radioactive materials to the waste dump.
What if a truck crashes?
What if the truck is hijacked by terrorists and dumped into the middle of a city?
Notice that such incidents are not covered by any home or industrial insurance policies
as the result has never ending unpredictable costs.

That's the problem.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Rorschach » Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:01 pm

Synroc is not 100% safe... not commercially available and still needs very long term storage facilities.

What we need is different technology away from Uranium based fission power.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11787
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Super Nova » Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:58 pm

Rorschach wrote:Synroc is not 100% safe... not commercially available and still needs very long term storage facilities.

What we need is different technology away from Uranium based fission power.
Yes.... spot on. Fussion or the perpetual motion machine I am still working on.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Bobby » Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:58 pm

Rorschach wrote:Synroc is not 100% safe... not commercially available and still needs very long term storage facilities.

What we need is different technology away from Uranium based fission power.

It's still a lot better than just dumping it above the water table.
Uranium is water soluble.

On the other hand Thorium does not dissolve in water.
I want to see a research reactor in Australia using molten salt with Thorium.
The Chinese already have over 600 nuclear scientists working on such a reactor.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Rorschach » Wed Feb 28, 2018 2:17 pm

India and Australia have been working on Thorium Reactors for a long time too perhaps longer than China... and both have amongst the world's largest Thorium reserves.

Thorium reactors cannot meltdown.
Thorium reactors can use other reactor waste materials.
Thorium reactors produce less waste.
Thorium is more abundant than Uranium.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Neferti » Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:21 pm

I thought it a better idea to send all those whining ABORIGINALS out into the Simpson Desert ... let them start again and CREATE something other than "dot paintings".

They could also drive the trucks with all that "waste material" ... if the Abos don't want to do it, how about inviting those INDIANS who ring up and tell you rubbish for $1 an hour ... $50 an hour to drive a truck would make them feel like MILLIONAIRES and they don't need clean water or toilets out there in the Simpson Desert, so IDEAL.

:mrgreen:

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by IQS.RLOW » Thu Mar 01, 2018 1:35 am

Rorschach wrote:India and Australia have been working on Thorium Reactors for a long time too perhaps longer than China... and both have amongst the world's largest Thorium reserves.

Thorium reactors cannot meltdown.
Thorium reactors can use other reactor waste materials.
Thorium reactors produce less waste.
Thorium is more abundant than Uranium.
Thorium reactors are a red herring.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Bobby » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:50 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:
Rorschach wrote:India and Australia have been working on Thorium Reactors for a long time too perhaps longer than China... and both have amongst the world's largest Thorium reserves.

Thorium reactors cannot meltdown.
Thorium reactors can use other reactor waste materials.
Thorium reactors produce less waste.
Thorium is more abundant than Uranium.
Thorium reactors are a red herring.

No they are not:
This video has a deceiving title -
it promotes Thorium.


User avatar
Gordon
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: Bernardi backs nuclear waste dump in SA

Post by Gordon » Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:47 pm

Put it in the Adelaide drinking water to clean it up a bit :rofl

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 40 guests