Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Sciences, Environmental/Climate issues, Academia and Technical interests
Post Reply
Warrior

Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Warrior » Sat Sep 16, 2017 2:11 pm

After working on the new advanced Multiversal Model it became very apparent that the Many Worlds Model is simply far too limited to account for both many aspects of Quantum Mechanics but as well is far too limited to account for an Infinite System.

Many Worlds is basically the concept that there are Infinite Divergent Universal Sates of Reality existing thus there are infinite versions of you and me and everyone else all existing in infinite alternate divergent states of universal reality however according to Many Worlds all Alternate Universal realities all have the same physical/natural laws.

This aspect simply cannot describe a true infinite multiversal system thus at MIT we developed the Multiversal Model where Many Worlds is simply just one small aspect of this model.

The Multiversal Model has as a part of it Infinite numbers of BASELINE UNIVERSAL REALITY GROUPINGS where as each Baseline Universal Grouping contains within it an infinite number of Alternate Divergent Universal Realities all having the same physical/Natural laws.

BUT EACH BASELINE UNIVERSAL GROUPING has a completely different and alien set of physical natural laws to each other Baseline Universal Grouping thus this much better accounts for a Multiversal Infinite System.

Experiments showing that Quark/Antiquark Virtual Pairings within Hadrons are existing at and between a numerical minimum and maximum however these virtual pairings NEVER exceed the numerical minimums or maximums.

Taking into account that such virtual pairings very well may be driven by PROBABILITY it compliments the infinite ideoogy.

Warrior.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Rorschach » Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:53 pm

DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Warrior

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Warrior » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:37 am

Well I certainly can understand why some Aussies not having the overwhelmingly massive U.S. Military/Collegiate Budget for research and development that we have would reply like this but then again...after all....you are an Aussie.

Warrior.

Warrior

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Warrior » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:56 am

Besides the LINK you supplied is akin to talking to Martha Stewart about Quantum Mechanics!!

Warrior.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Super Nova » Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:13 pm

Welcome to PA Warrior.

I have to say while I try to understand the concepts of most of todays science I really get a headache on this stuff.
Experiments showing that Quark/Antiquark Virtual Pairings within Hadrons are existing at and between a numerical minimum and maximum however these virtual pairings NEVER exceed the numerical minimums or maximums.

Taking into account that such virtual pairings very well may be driven by PROBABILITY it compliments the infinite ideoogy.
The particle pairing "spooky action at a distance" where their entanglement creates some sort of clink/communications at a distance that appears to be instant supports the notion of extra dimensions. Spawning string and other multidimensional theories. The mass of the Higgs particle not being what is expected and the thought that it could be any value assigned at random when the universe was created and therefore by extension, we need a multiverse to explain this just blows my head up.

I think this is just good story writing at this time while we look to the math that fits and until we have at least one of these many theories validated by some experiment... it is just one of a set of ideas to help explain quantum pairing and the holes in the standard model.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Rorschach » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:23 pm

If you didn't get the point insults aint gonna help.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Warrior

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Warrior » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:15 am

Super Nova wrote:Welcome to PA Warrior.

I have to say while I try to understand the concepts of most of todays science I really get a headache on this stuff.
Experiments showing that Quark/Antiquark Virtual Pairings within Hadrons are existing at and between a numerical minimum and maximum however these virtual pairings NEVER exceed the numerical minimums or maximums.

Taking into account that such virtual pairings very well may be driven by PROBABILITY it compliments the infinite ideoogy.
The particle pairing "spooky action at a distance" where their entanglement creates some sort of clink/communications at a distance that appears to be instant supports the notion of extra dimensions. Spawning string and other multidimensional theories. The mass of the Higgs particle not being what is expected and the thought that it could be any value assigned at random when the universe was created and therefore by extension, we need a multiverse to explain this just blows my head up.

I think this is just good story writing at this time while we look to the math that fits and until we have at least one of these many theories validated by some experiment... it is just one of a set of ideas to help explain quantum pairing and the holes in the standard model.

Thank you for the welcome SN.

I am not talking about Particle Pairing or "spooky action at a distance"....which really had Einstein stumped.

What I am talking about is that it appears that PROBABILITY is dictating Virtual Quark/Antiquark pairings numerically.

This is a prime example of how any specific action or lack of action and the probability of its occurrence or not seems to be in conjunction or driven by Quark/Antiquark Virtual Pairing Numerics.

This shows us that depending upon whether such virtual pairings exist at or closer to a minimum the action will tend not to generate an alternate reality or at least less of but when such virtual pairings exist close to or at numerical maximum the Probability in favor of many Alternate Divergent Universal Realities is a given.

But this is but within but only ONE Baseline Universal Grouping.

There are infinite numbers of Baseline Universal Groupings.

Warrior.

Warrior

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Warrior » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:21 am

Rorschach wrote:If you didn't get the point insults aint gonna help.
I think you have not made a point.

Listen what I am discussing goes far beyond what is generally known and that does not mean I am better than anyone else it just means I have an advanced understanding of something the U.S. Military has developed VERY practical applications for.

Here is a link to a video showing the U.S. Military's TR-3B Antigravity Recon and Attack Aircraft.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGELziXtUoU

This next link shows a U.S. TR-3B using an advanced weapon system wiping out terrorist positions in Syria...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8T6vTZM-dA

Warrior

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Warrior » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:23 am

Rorschach wrote:If you didn't get the point insults aint gonna help.

While you and others believe that there is no proof a Multiverse Exists.......we here in the U.S. are already navigating it.

Warrior,

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Many Worlds Model too Limited.

Post by Rorschach » Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:50 pm

Sure you are...
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests