The Rats are circling Mal Rightards where are you?

[J o h n S m i t h]

What I posted is the cost to educate a child

and totally irrelevant to the question I asked

" Nuh uh" does not a rebuttal make.

I can't rebut what you've refused to answer

I accept your surrender on the point of you have no idea of how education funding works.

at no point did anyone argue over the cost per child

When you demand diverting of allocated funds for education via private facilities that currently save taxpayers 43% into the public system

at no point does that equate to a demand that people aren't offered private education .... ohhm and the 43% savings figure is a load of shit. For reasons I've already explained

You seem to be unaware of what happens when the same data has many different people apply logic and analysis to it,

you don't seem to understand that repeating a claim ad hoc does not at any stage represent 'applying logic'

When many people reach the same economic conclusion from a data set

many people? the private school industry is the only one to offer any 'data' .... everyone else merely repeats their data. It's like asking a politician to explain what a great job their doing ... there answers are always going to be a load of hogwash designed to promote their agenda


as for the rest of your baloney, i'm not even going to bother reading it. If all you can do is go on about unions and communists and fantacised numbers that you pulled out of your arse, you've obviously got no fucken idea. Anyone with facts doesn't need to resort to such melodramatics to hide their inadequacies.

[IQS.RLOW]

and totally irrelevant to the question I asked

I've already blown your strawman away.
Do you think you can sit here and pretend he is real?
Is he your imaginary friend?

I can't rebut what you've refused to answer

A strawman doesn't require an answer.

at no point did anyone argue over the cost per child

You mean except for you, right now?
Thats because you want to ignore the actual cost for education.
You do this because you know you are a clueless fucktard and are desperate to dismiss the facts of actual costs and toss strawman to the wind to ask an irrelevant question about "how much tax you paid towards xxx". It doesn't matter how much tax anyone pays because the cost to the system for educating a child isn't dependant on tax paid, you clueless fucking hairy backed monkey

.... ohhm

No point chanting, no amount of meditation or praying or whatever the fuck you do will save you from your very own display of ignorance.

...and the 43% savings figure is a load of shit. For reasons I've already explained

...a combination of the only two debating weapons in your arsenal straight from the Getup and YRAW online training manual.
The " Nuh uh" followed by "just lie about it"

you don't seem to understand that repeating a claim ad hoc does not at any stage represent 'applying logic'

You've clearly demonstrated that you are devoid of all logic and unable to post even a single sentence that supports your side.
That will happen when you have no clue about what the facts are or your argument is about.Although you have comprehensively proven you're a simpleton who parrots Getup propaganda.

many people? the private school industry is the only one to offer any 'data' ....

I see you are still completely confused, probably because youve been fucked so hard in this thread your arsehole has prolapsed and you are trying to work out if you have shit yourself, so I will post this again so you can understand what 'data' is

1. When many people reach the same economic conclusion from a data set, the data will show a clear picture or trend of what is actually occuring.
2. The data is known as a fact or facts.
3. When this happens, the conclusion can be debated but not the data unless you introduce a new data set.
4. If someone wants to argue against the conclusion, they have to use the same data to prove the conclusion is wrong.

Even after I gave you the information you are still so fucking dumb you seem to think the 'data' has been provided by the private education sector.
The data is from the govt available to everyone. The conclusion is from the private education system.
If you had half a brain, you would be asking yourself
Q1. "Why haven't the teachers union produced their own conclusion?" and
Q2. "Why haven't they come out and argued against it, like I have done right here"
A1. There is no other conclusion to draw.
A2. They may have some level of self pride and don't want to make an idiot of themselves, like you have done right here.
Oh dear...

as for the rest of your baloney, i'm not even going to bother reading it.

Game, set, match. Your surrender is accepted.
Maybe next time you can try harder and be a bit more competitive?
You really want to land at least one blow when your arguing a position, otherwise it's just you embarrassing yourself.
Maybe embarrassing yourself is what you were going for? In that case, you have done a fantastic job

[J o h n S m i t h]

I've already blown your strawman away

what strawman? you asked for your portion of the tax that you pay that is used for public education to be refunded to you. I merely asked you how much of taxes you paid went to education? That you can't answer that shows just how ridiculous your proposition was.

A strawman doesn't require an answer.

and yet you keep presenting strawmen

You mean except for you, right now?

really? where was that exactly?
care to highlight my disagreeing with the figures of cost per child?

...a combination of the only two debating weapons in your arsenal straight from the Getup and YRAW online training manual.
The " Nuh uh" followed by "just lie about it"

yet you had the option to refute the points I made ... but you still opted for 'Nuh uh' and lies.

You've clearly demonstrated that you are devoid of all logic and unable to post even a single sentence that supports your side.

that's why you spent your whole post on me and not on the topic

so I will post this again so you can understand what 'data' is

repeating your OPINION does not make it fact, no matter how often you do it

Why haven't the teachers union produced their own conclusion?

you mean the same teachers union that represnets members in the private schools?

Game, set, match. Your surrender is accepted.

before I can surrender you need to first make it to the battle. ...... so far you've been absent

[IQS.RLOW]

you asked for your portion of the tax that you pay that is used for public education to be refunded to you.

Nope. Here's what I wrote...but you already knew that.

if you want to defund private schools then anyone who pays for private education will get a full refund to the value of the public cost of education,

So you have at least one and possibly all of the following ;
1. You can't read and you have comprehension problems
2. You are a pathological liar (you're a progressive- goes without saying really)
3. You're mentally retarded
4. You're a masochist who gets off on being publicly humiliated.

When you've learnt to read, you should have another go at humiliating yourself.
Try to not make it seem as transparent with your masochism as you currently are.
Wanking yourself stupid will be the shortest journey you'll ever take but at least your IQ will increase 1-2 points.

[J o h n S m i t h]

Nope. Here's what I wrote...but you already knew that.

the same thing applies you dickhead, only to more than one person. You'd need to know how much each persons portion of their taxes went to public schools. An impossible feat since that's not how our tax system works. Have you any idea how stupid it is to even suggest such a thing? How do you know your taxes didn't go towards chopper flights? or psychiatric assessments? or politicians wages? or hospitals? or ports? customs? or anywhere else that govt. funds. I don't want my taxes going submarines or to send our troops to the middle east either, or a rail line for Adani, can I get a refund on that?

keep pretending you dopey fluffy bunny. It's all you've got.

[IQS.RLOW]

You'd need to know how much each persons portion of their taxes went to public schools

Nope. Only you reached down into your bowels to pull out that strawman and now you're clinging to it like a drowning man with a piece of foam Esky.

The cost to educate a child is the cost.
Under the public union bludger model it would cost $12639 to educate your daughter-wife.
Under private it is 43% less.
It doesn't matter what a person is paid, what amount of tax they paid or how many dicks you had to suck on the weekend to afford the amount of stupid pills you have taken. The cost is immutable.

You want to remove funding to a system that is already 43% cheaper than your union shitheap then people who don't want to subject their kids to your union shitheap and become tragic PC-LBGTQIFAG lefty snowflakes like yourself, who couldn't argue a point even when youre choked with it more often than your regular weekend dress up as an Oxford Street urinal.

Those people are entitled to the cost that would be spent on their child in a public school.
If you want to play the little johnny Stalinist fuckwit and remove the remaining 57% of the $12639 that your union shitpost costs, anyone going 100% private gets the full $12639 paid to their private school of choice.

...and just to stuff your strawman back into your arse for the final time
IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH TAX PEOPLE PAY!!!
Even you, being a net tax receiver would be entitled to get $12639 sent to a private school if you managed to find a woman who could stifle her vomit reflex long enough for her to give you a pity fuck and didn't kill herself after realising that she's going to be stuck for life with a low paid bludger with entitlement syndrome after her loins get torn up spitting out your useless crotch fruit.

The cost to educate that hairy backed mini-mario will still be $12639

[J o h n S m i t h]

The cost to educate a child is the cost.

but no one is disputing the cost you idiot.

you asked for taxes YOU paid towards education to be refunded to you. how can anyone do that if you can't even nominate how much of your taxes went towards education?

Are you starting to see just how stupid you are for trying that, now?

anyone going 100% private gets the full $12639 paid to their private school of choice.

ahhh ... moving the goalposts again ...It was bound to happen

This all started with after you asked for a refund for what you contributed towards public education after I said that people who want to send their kids to private school should pay their own way. From that you now want a full subsidy.

you idiot

[IQS.RLOW]

you asked for taxes YOU paid towards education to be refunded to you

Still clinging on while your prolapse lies bleeding behind you.

Quote me.

[J o h n S m i t h]

run away little girl.

Perhaps next time you'll think it through before coming up with such a stupid comment.

[IQS.RLOW]

run away little girl.

Perhaps next time you'll think it through before coming up with such a stupid comment.

No quote Johnny boy?