LEFTWINGER supreme wrote:Pack ya bags rtards , it's over



LEFTWINGER supreme wrote:Pack ya bags rtards , it's over
A education policy that decides that $23Bn should be spent before deciding what should be funded is pure filthy leftard fuckwittery.J o h n S m i t h wrote:Turdball has done everything the right has asked off him.
an education policy that throws millions at elite private schools whilst cutting funding from underprivileged public schools is straight out of the retarded rights handbook. It's exactly what the likes of Abbott and the rest of the religious right were gunning for and it's exactly what they got. You can tell yourself it's leftie policy if you like, that will only serve to highlight your stupidity.IQS.RLOW wrote: A education policy that decides that $23Bn should be spent before deciding what should be funded is pure filthy leftard fuckwittery.
Yes, you are correct Nef. Some retards are just incapable of thinking for themselves or understanding the facts.Neferti~ wrote:Aren't "state" schools funded mainly by the State Governments?
Here is the ABC's write up about School Funding. Read it.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-30/s ... ki/8555276
yes, i thought it was obvious that we were referring to the federal funding part of the equation.Neferti~ wrote:Aren't "state" schools funded mainly by the State Governments?
Here is the ABC's write up about School Funding. Read it.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-30/s ... ki/8555276
So there you go. It is all the Catholics fault.Why do private schools get public funding?
In some countries, like the US, students in private schools get almost no money from the public purse.
And in countries like Canada and New Zealand, the proportion of government money going to private schools is much lower than in Australia.
The reason why Australian governments fund private schools is historical.
The post-war baby boom put huge strain on both public and Catholic schools, the latter of which had traditionally educated children from poor families.
The Catholic school system was near to collapse, while rest of the private school system survived based on their fees and other private income.
Glenn Savage, a senior lecturer in education policy at the University of Melbourne, says the federal government decided that if it did not provide funding to the Catholic sector it could collapse, and that would see a huge flood of students into a government system that was already stressed.
"That solution was put in place in the 1970s and it has had ongoing repercussions that we have never moved away from," he said.
Private schools educate lots of children
Fifty years later, the Catholic school system educates about 20 per cent of children at all levels and other private schools have 14 per cent of students, with the rest in public schools.
Seventy per cent of primary school students go to public schools, but the number of secondary students in public schools has now fallen below 60 per cent.
sure isNeferti~ wrote: So there you go. It is all the Catholics fault.
Fuck off Smith, you lying piece of leftist shit.J o h n S m i t h wrote:sure isNeferti~ wrote: So there you go. It is all the Catholics fault.
20% of children, 60% of the funding ... I guess some kids are more 'entitled' than others![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests