remind me, who was it again who legislated for nannies to be subsidised by the public?IQS.RLOW wrote:l after getting her spawn handed to her by her taxpayer funded nanny
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
remind me, who was it again who legislated for nannies to be subsidised by the public?IQS.RLOW wrote:l after getting her spawn handed to her by her taxpayer funded nanny
Remind me who was the fuckwit blowhard communotard government in 1972?J o h n S m i t h wrote:remind me, who was it again who legislated for nannies to be subsidised by the public?IQS.RLOW wrote:l after getting her spawn handed to her by her taxpayer funded nanny![]()
![]()
![]()
The Commonwealth Government first became financially involved with childcare in 1972
Pay attention Johnny. I said discreetly. Big word for you I know but look it up as it is quite relevant.J o h n S m i t h wrote:except for all the retards who are crying because Larissa tried to do just that.Black Orchid wrote: No-one is denying her the right to breastfeed her baby. Not even discreetly in public. Can you grasp that? NO-ONE!
IQS.RLOW wrote:Hardly surprising the lefty virtue signallers are falling all over themselves to praise a green signalling her virtue by performing nothing special after getting her spawn handed to her by her taxpayer funded nanny from the taxpayer funded crèche.
Black Orchid wrote:Pay attention Johnny. I said discreetly. Big word for you I know but look it up as it is quite relevant.J o h n S m i t h wrote:except for all the retards who are crying because Larissa tried to do just that.Black Orchid wrote: No-one is denying her the right to breastfeed her baby. Not even discreetly in public. Can you grasp that? NO-ONE!
Then you obviously don't get out much. Just read the news feed comments or social media.J o h n S m i t h wrote:I haven't heard one new mother complain. In fact, the only complaints have been from bitter old hags or men.
Black Orchid wrote:It's not a matter of rights either. It is a matter of respecting others. Now if she was just sitting there waiting and was feeding the baby that is one thing I have no problem with but what she did was quite another and was clearly on her agenda. Weren't her nanny and husband also there?
This feminist rhetoric that "I can show my breasts whenever I wish to but if you look or comment you are an animal" is total nonsense. If a man waved his penis at some of these mental midgets they would be the first to scream foul.
What wasn't discreet about it dopey? She had a shawl covering her breast and the babies head.Black Orchid wrote:Pay attention Johnny. I said discreetly. Big word for you I know but look it up as it is quite relevant.J o h n S m i t h wrote:except for all the retards who are crying because Larissa tried to do just that.Black Orchid wrote: No-one is denying her the right to breastfeed her baby. Not even discreetly in public. Can you grasp that? NO-ONE!
and you know they're not bitter old hags because ?????????????????????????????????????????????Black Orchid wrote:Then you obviously don't get out much. Just read the news feed comments or social media.J o h n S m i t h wrote:I haven't heard one new mother complain. In fact, the only complaints have been from bitter old hags or men.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 90 guests