Ban Muslims?

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Neferti » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:46 am

Black Orchid wrote:Should these children be allowed back into Australia? I say a resounding NO.
.............. His wife, Tara Nettleton, died in 2015, leaving the children in the Middle East. Her mother Karen has tried unsuccessfully to bring the children back to Australia
I say NO. If Karen wants to see her grandkids, she can always fly over there for a visit. ;)

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25705
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Black Orchid » Sat May 06, 2017 6:28 pm

Arizona has the right idea!!
With hordes of Muslim migrants flooding the U.S., Arizona is a state that’s resettled more than its “fair share” of asylum seekers. However, up to half of all their Muslim refugees have already left the state on their own accord with more to follow because of one simple thing the residents are doing.

Although larger and more liberal states are gladly accepting ceaseless waves of unvettable migrants mostly from Islamic countries, Arizona has taken in over 7,000 Somali refugees alone. Since states have been penalized under the Barack Obama administration, the southwestern state wasn’t about to ship out thousands of welfare-leeching religious supremacists who hail from one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Fortunately, they discovered an easy way to make their entitled guests leave of their own volition.

According to the Phoenix New Times, at least half of the 7,351 Somali refugees resettled in Arizona have moved out of the state because there are not enough welfare and government benefits for their liking. Additionally, they are fleeing because the state requires them to learn English and find jobs in order to attain food stamps.

Like all refugees, each migrant resettled in Arizona receive a lump payment of $925 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Of course, the state receiving said migrants is expected to foot the rest of their bills after the stipend is used up. However, Arizona doesn’t offer additional funding unless these welfarers take the necessary steps to earn them, which tellingly proves to be too much for many.

According to the local outlet, refugees are required to complete a monthly report proving that they are taking English classes and looking for jobs. If they skip out on the language course or refuse to apply in the workforce, their food stamps are cut off and they are denied all other state benefits.

“The one thing that Arizona does very well is making sure that at least these families will not go hungry,” Somali asylum seeker Mukhtar Sheikh says. “But sometimes these families don’t get enough help — they come in saying, “Oh, my food stamps have stopped,’ so we have to call DES and ask them why.”

Sheikh admitted that he and his family were leaving Arizona for better benefits elsewhere, adding that he’s personally witnessed the mass exodus of Somali Muslims in the state.

“If that money runs out and they don’t have a job, then there starts to be pressure for them to find a way to survive,” Sheikh says. “There’s not a lot of programs to help them with employment here.”

Of course, Sheikh fails to mention that the refugees aren’t required to have a job but to seek one out. In addition, he admits that the refugees being imported “have no educational background,” which debunks the liberal narrative that these third-world countries are sending their best and brightest.

Despite the Somali Association of Arizona stepping in to provide groceries and money, the Muslim asylum seekers packed up their belongings to head to more Democratic states like Minnesota.


Minnesota boasts the largest Somali population. Subsequently, the northern state is now feeling the effects of mass migration, suffering measles outbreaks, migrant gangs, the rise of Sharia no-go zones, and watching their first Somali Muslim state legislator Ilhan Omar vote to give life insurance payouts to beneficiaries of Islamic jihadists.

After resettling more than 32,000 Somalis, Minnesota took a different approach to its growing Muslim population. Now, it’s found that its Somali community fails to assimilate and forms its own segregated demographic, fueling hatred of American values and laws.

Thanks to Arizona’s unwillingness to bend over backward and fulfill the endless demands of this extremely vocal religious minority, they are leaving to leech off of more politically correct states. With its approach to welfare and the workforce, Arizona is not only proving that these migrants aren’t here to better society, they’re showing us how to combat the migration problem with a legal yet effective approach.
http://readflicks.com/arizona-finds-sim ... ve-droves/

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25705
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Black Orchid » Fri May 19, 2017 11:03 am

THE decision by Auburn Council in NSW to install ‘privacy’ curtains at a new public swimming pool in Auburn is a disgrace and completely at odds with Australian values.

Belgravia Leisure, which operates the Council run Auburn Ruth Everuss Aquatic Centre, has said that it decided to erect the curtain to ‘overcome cultural barriers and encourage Muslim women to use the pool.’

After decades of struggle to achieve gender-equality between men and women, the Auburn Council’s decision to divide the sexes in the pool with a giant curtain is an immensely backward move. It is a giant step in the wrong direction.

By installing the curtain in the aquatic centre, Auburn Council is basically introducing gender apartheid in NSW at the expense of unwitting rate payers.

The segregation of men and women in public spaces is totally unacceptable. One hundred years ago Governments in this country would require men and women to bathe at separate times or compel women to use bathing machines at the beach.
Promoting multiple wives and now segregation? Way to go Australia. NOT!!

The children will never assimilate if we promote segregation. Girls should NOT be taught that their bodies are to be hidden and ashamed of or that all men are animals and cannot control themselves. It's a disgrace.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

cods
Posts: 6433
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by cods » Fri May 19, 2017 2:36 pm

it seems a bit odd to me because the women still cover up head to toe...even though its only women...

why dont they build their own pool.???... if this is such a big deal...they build their own churchs and own schools.. probably shop in their own shops run by their own people....so why not build their own pool.. :roll: :roll:


well it makes sense to me as has has been said its gender apartheid.do we really want more segregation????....

I belive there is something about unisex toilets...to make it easier for trannies... so where do they fit in in all this??????? :roll: :roll:



just sayin!

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Neferti » Fri May 19, 2017 4:42 pm

WHY are the "authorities" afraid of Muslims?

Migrants, from all over the World, have arrived here, en masse, since post WW2 ... they ALL wanted to become Aussies and every one of them did. They FITTED IN and learned English. They gave us a new culinary ideas and enriched our society.

Some of the Migrants after WW2 were from Albania and around that area and were Muslims but they kept a very low profile and their Mosques have never been "egg bombed". They also "fitted in" to the Australian society, learned English and dressed appropriately for the Aussie climate. They certainly DID NOT demand special treatment.

This latest bow down by a Sydney Council is disgusting. Separated swimming pools ... christians versus muslims?

****************************************************************************************************************************************

Cods. I think they gave up on communal toilets and what was that other stupidity? Teaching pre-schoolers that there are transvestites and men who want to have their penis removed and implants so that they can be WOMEN. STUPIDITY
Little kids need to know that Mummy and Daddy love them (plus Grandma ;) ) and that the pictures they draw are "absolutely wonderful".

There is really something odd about parent/s who think that their 3 year old boy saying that he wishes he was a girl needs a Psychiatrist .... I think that the parents need their "heads read".

Three year olds "dress up" ... they pretend that they are all sorts of things ....

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat May 20, 2017 3:59 pm

Black Orchid wrote:Arizona has the right idea!!
With hordes of Muslim migrants flooding the U.S., Arizona is a state that’s resettled more than its “fair share” of asylum seekers. However, up to half of all their Muslim refugees have already left the state on their own accord with more to follow because of one simple thing the residents are doing.
A shame our wog loving pinko govt agencies don't follow suit.

When I was still in Sydney (so 20 odd years ago) I remember reports about the locals at Minto (a mostly housing commission slum out near Campbelltown) kicking up a stink because the Mozzies wanted to build a Mosque at Minto, and the govts of the day were giving it the OK.
At the time I said "I know how I'd deal with it - I'd walk my pet pig past their building site every day, and encourage it to shit on their lawn".
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat May 20, 2017 4:15 pm

Neferti~ wrote:WHY are the "authorities" afraid of Muslims?

Migrants, from all over the World, have arrived here, en masse, since post WW2 ... they ALL wanted to become Aussies and every one of them did. They FITTED IN and learned English. They gave us a new culinary ideas and enriched our society.

Some of the Migrants after WW2 were from Albania and around that area and were Muslims but they kept a very low profile and their Mosques have never been "egg bombed". They also "fitted in" to the Australian society, learned English and dressed appropriately for the Aussie climate. They certainly DID NOT demand special treatment.

This latest bow down by a Sydney Council is disgusting. Separated swimming pools ... christians versus muslims?
Good point!

A bloke I know is the son of an Albanian post WW2 refugee.
He (the Albanian father) was a school teacher, and although nominally Muslim (with the surname 'Ali') wasn't particularly religious.
Apparently he had to get out (of Albania) because the Russian allied Chetniks (Serbs) were taking over the Balkans to create Yogoslavia, and Muslims weren't welcome.
He moved to OZ, married a widowed Catholic and took her surname so all the kids would have the same surname. Saved his money from Labouring to buy an orchard so the family would all have employment.

If I had to bail from OZ, I wouldn't be demanding my hosts all wear rubber thongs, eat meat pies and yell show us yer tits out car windows.
I'd learn the lingo and do what I could to fit in - When in Rome do as the Romans do.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25705
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Black Orchid » Thu Jun 08, 2017 10:29 am

Now we have this ...
The Herald Sun revealed today that the Islamic Council of Victoria wants young Muslims to have access to taxpayer-funded “safe spaces” in which they can make “inflammatory” comments.

Premier Daniel Andrews slammed the Council’s call as “wrong”, saying the places would be a “hate space”.

“There is no safe way to rail against the West,” he said.

“It is wrong, it is not going to receive any state funding.

“We will be having a very close look at the Islamic Council of Victoria’s funding in a broader sense because I am very troubled, very troubled, by the suggestion that we might have a space where people could be radical as part of a deradicalisation program.

“We’ll be having a close look at the Islamic Council of Victoria’s funding and their approach to these matters in a boarder sense.

“We will not be supporting this.”

In a highly controversial submission to a parliamentary inquiry into freedom of religion, the Islamic Council of Victoria is demanding that funding for federal counter-terrorism and anti-extremism programs be diverted to create the refuges.

“Muslim young people are feeling more emotionally overloaded. A safe space is needed for them to meet and talk about a range of issues in emotional terms, where they can be frank and even use words which in a public space would sound inflammatory,” the submission says.

“That they cannot express irony, humour, anger or joy in words and facial expressions that would make them a target for ‘surveillance’ is a cause for despondency leading to mental health issues among many.”


The council’s submission to the federal inquiry also slams national laws to impose control orders on terrorism suspects as young as 14, saying this has “a dampening effect on the freedom of religion for Muslim Victorians”.

It wants the control orders reviewed and for taxpayers to fund counselling for Muslim parents of children affected by the orders.

“This will acknowledge the risks to mental health, employment, rental housing, poverty and education as a result of any unforeseen consequences of legislation which disproportionately affects Muslim youth,” the submission says.

The council has received millions of dollars for programs since 2001, including a $850,000 youth officer grant over four years and $550,000 for an “empower youth” program over three years.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victor ... 22e6d25d15

These 'gurus' and controllers of purported 'moderate muslims' are the worst of the worst. Should we wake up and impose a total ban on all Islamic immigration.

HELL YES!!!

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Jun 08, 2017 4:02 pm

It's illegal (hate crime) for me to say "we should" use violence or genocide ect to deal with the Muslim menace.
So I'm not going to. I'm going to repeat my assertions that most Westernised countries "will" evict their Muslim communities for their own safety and economic wellbeing.

Now there are 2 ways we can achieve this. #1 with lynch mobs and para-military death squads or , #2 politics.
Naturally most favour the political option, so here's my thoughts on that>

One Nation is incompetent and a sell out. Their representation may increase, but even so, they would never achieve the desired goal.
Bernardi has merged with Family Fuckwits. Jesus freaks will never achieve the desired goal, and someone who bangs on with references to "God" cannot be trusted, period!

That leaves Liberty Alliance. Sure sections of the media are trying to tarnish them over some neo-Nazi skinhead members, but so what? At least we know where they stand, and aren't afraid to standby their convictions.

AEC recently sent me a letter about no registered voters at my address and requesting I enroll.
I haven't, but I'm considering it.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25705
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Ban Muslims?

Post by Black Orchid » Thu Jun 08, 2017 4:45 pm

I have been receiving an abundance of electoral paper recently, usually duplicates of where I am enrolled etc. I wonder if something is in the wind?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests