SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Christ almighty I cant believe it, I am posting a bolt topic
POLICE ADMIT: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
April 13, 2017 9:23am
After years of evasions, Victoria Police reveals the full catastrophe of the Howard Government's decision to let in poorly educated Sudanese refugees from tribal war zones who'd struggle to fit in.
Sudanese make up just 0.11 per cent of Victoria's population but 4.8 per cent of aggravated burglary offenders.
That makes them 44 times more likely to break the law.
Then there are these statistics:
But Sudanese youths were vastly over-represented in the 2015 data, responsible for 7.44 per cent of home invasions, 5.65 per cent of car thefts and 13.9 per cent of aggravated robberies, despite Sudanese-born citizens making up about 0.11 per cent of Victoria's population.
Nearly 70 times more likely, then, to commit a home invasion than are Australian-born youths.
Yes, most Sudanese do not break the law. Yes, it is nice to help the victims of war. But why have we put so many Victorians in danger by letting in people who so plainly would struggle to adapt?
And why the years of falsehoods and coverup?
Remember the falsehoods once spread by then Chief Commissioner of police Christine Nixon, after Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews said Sudanese crime rates were too high and he was cutting the immigration intake?:
But worst was the reaction of Victoria Police, led by Labor-appointed Christine Nixon.
Nixon claimed Andrews was wrong about Sudanese crime rates: “They’re not, in a sense, represented more than the proportion of them in the population.”
A police multicultural liaison officer agreed: “There’s an under-representation of the Sudanese in crime stats.”
Those police claims were false. Figures let slip by Nixon the following year revealed crime rates for Sudanese youth at least four times the state average.
And that's now got dramatically worse.
But remember also how the multicultural lobby and media Left vilified Andrews for telling the truth and trying to stop us from importing even more danger?
The ethnic lobby predictably denounced him as a racist, as did Labor politicians.
“It has been a long time since I have heard such a pure form of racism out of the mouth of any Australian politician,” sneered Queensland premier Anna Bligh.
We had a “leadership which allows divisiveness”, stormed the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission.
And the elite media pack-attacked.
The Age accused Andrews of making “unpleasant and inflammatory” comments to provoke “a predictably base reaction from those sensitive to immigration on racial grounds”.
Where are the apologies? Where's the acknowledgement that the Left made a terrible mistake?
The ABC has also consistently tried to ignore, hide or diminish the problem with specious arguments like this:
Commentators have linked a recent spate of crimes to the so-called Apex gang, heightening anti-migration rhetoric, but police statistics show most home invasions, car thefts and aggravated robberies are committed by people born in Australia.
Of course most such crimes are committed by the dominant demographic, but note the evasions. First, how many of those born in Australia are actually born to Sudanese parents? Second, and more relevant: what is the crime rate of each ethnic group?
Yes, the born-here cohort commit crime, but why are we adding to the problem by importing people 44 times more likely to bash, rob and smash into your home?
Meanwhile the ABC continues to hire - and never, ever questions - the Minister who so foolishly let in so many Sudanese who would obviously struggle to fit in. And to this day, Amanda Vanstone is hailed by the Left as the more compassionate of the Liberal immigration ministers, despite having helped to unleash mayhem.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andre ... 1492311187
POLICE ADMIT: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
April 13, 2017 9:23am
After years of evasions, Victoria Police reveals the full catastrophe of the Howard Government's decision to let in poorly educated Sudanese refugees from tribal war zones who'd struggle to fit in.
Sudanese make up just 0.11 per cent of Victoria's population but 4.8 per cent of aggravated burglary offenders.
That makes them 44 times more likely to break the law.
Then there are these statistics:
But Sudanese youths were vastly over-represented in the 2015 data, responsible for 7.44 per cent of home invasions, 5.65 per cent of car thefts and 13.9 per cent of aggravated robberies, despite Sudanese-born citizens making up about 0.11 per cent of Victoria's population.
Nearly 70 times more likely, then, to commit a home invasion than are Australian-born youths.
Yes, most Sudanese do not break the law. Yes, it is nice to help the victims of war. But why have we put so many Victorians in danger by letting in people who so plainly would struggle to adapt?
And why the years of falsehoods and coverup?
Remember the falsehoods once spread by then Chief Commissioner of police Christine Nixon, after Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews said Sudanese crime rates were too high and he was cutting the immigration intake?:
But worst was the reaction of Victoria Police, led by Labor-appointed Christine Nixon.
Nixon claimed Andrews was wrong about Sudanese crime rates: “They’re not, in a sense, represented more than the proportion of them in the population.”
A police multicultural liaison officer agreed: “There’s an under-representation of the Sudanese in crime stats.”
Those police claims were false. Figures let slip by Nixon the following year revealed crime rates for Sudanese youth at least four times the state average.
And that's now got dramatically worse.
But remember also how the multicultural lobby and media Left vilified Andrews for telling the truth and trying to stop us from importing even more danger?
The ethnic lobby predictably denounced him as a racist, as did Labor politicians.
“It has been a long time since I have heard such a pure form of racism out of the mouth of any Australian politician,” sneered Queensland premier Anna Bligh.
We had a “leadership which allows divisiveness”, stormed the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission.
And the elite media pack-attacked.
The Age accused Andrews of making “unpleasant and inflammatory” comments to provoke “a predictably base reaction from those sensitive to immigration on racial grounds”.
Where are the apologies? Where's the acknowledgement that the Left made a terrible mistake?
The ABC has also consistently tried to ignore, hide or diminish the problem with specious arguments like this:
Commentators have linked a recent spate of crimes to the so-called Apex gang, heightening anti-migration rhetoric, but police statistics show most home invasions, car thefts and aggravated robberies are committed by people born in Australia.
Of course most such crimes are committed by the dominant demographic, but note the evasions. First, how many of those born in Australia are actually born to Sudanese parents? Second, and more relevant: what is the crime rate of each ethnic group?
Yes, the born-here cohort commit crime, but why are we adding to the problem by importing people 44 times more likely to bash, rob and smash into your home?
Meanwhile the ABC continues to hire - and never, ever questions - the Minister who so foolishly let in so many Sudanese who would obviously struggle to fit in. And to this day, Amanda Vanstone is hailed by the Left as the more compassionate of the Liberal immigration ministers, despite having helped to unleash mayhem.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andre ... 1492311187
- Bobby
- Posts: 18270
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
- Bobby
- Posts: 18270
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Sudanese should never have been allowed to come here.
Those responsible for letting them in should go to jail for life.
Those responsible for letting them in should go to jail for life.
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
I am inclined to agree with you! (and Herb and Bolt...FFS what am I saying!)
- Bobby
- Posts: 18270
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Redneck wrote:I am inclined to agree with you! (and Herb and Bolt...FFS what am I saying!)
Because we're right -
they can't assimilate.
The only thing they were ever taught is how to disassemble clean and re-assemble an AK47.
That's the sum total of their education -
they can't read or write - they're illiterate and
would be far better suited to living in a zoo where
we could go and watch them killing each other.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25696
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
They were hand picked from jungle zones and living in mud huts with dirt floors. How the hell did they expect to drop them in a big city and and assume they would acclimate.
At least the Muzzies in Sydney are killing each other and not everyone else. Yet!!
At least the Muzzies in Sydney are killing each other and not everyone else. Yet!!
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Deng Adut painted for the Archibald... he is a lawyer and was a child soldier in Sudan.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
- Posts: 6433
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Rorschach wrote:Deng Adut painted for the Archibald... he is a lawyer and was a child soldier in Sudan.
there is always an exception.....sadly thats it one exception...who ,isnt jail bait..
I agree with BO what were they thinking there is no LAW where they come from. the Sudan has been a war zone since forever.
we are kidding ourselves to think a whole group of mostly men will just fit in and become normal everyday citzs...
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
I haven't heard about maundering Sudanese youths of late, perhaps they are being housed at the Alexander Maconochie Centre?
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Don't know about their criminality (yet) but my current work place has just been invaded by Sudanese.
Last week we had 1. The next day we had 2.
This week we've got 18.
Apparently they've all come up from Toowoomba.
The boss will be loving it because these characters are fast/quick.
Too fast for me. I can't compete with the buggers.
Probably the only saving grace is I heard one calling another Adam.
A Jewish name suggests they're Christians from the South, rather than Muslims from the North.
Last week we had 1. The next day we had 2.
This week we've got 18.
Apparently they've all come up from Toowoomba.
The boss will be loving it because these characters are fast/quick.
Too fast for me. I can't compete with the buggers.
Probably the only saving grace is I heard one calling another Adam.
A Jewish name suggests they're Christians from the South, rather than Muslims from the North.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests