What an absolute epic failure this crew of dimwits and drongos are
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f77f6/f77f62abcadbefd213a50db0dfb0bb51d110626b" alt="Unsure :?"
YOU might live beyond your means but I have trouble actually SPENDING my money. My daughter and grand daughters will have a great time spending MY money ... UNLESS I leave it to the Cats Home or some other Charity.Sir Bobby wrote:I worry for our future.
We live way beyond our means & expect our grandchildren to pay the debt off for us.
Neferti~ wrote:YOU might live beyond your means but I have trouble actually SPENDING my money. My daughter and grand daughters will have a great time spending MY money ... UNLESS I leave it to the Cats Home or some other Charity.Sir Bobby wrote:I worry for our future.
We live way beyond our means & expect our grandchildren to pay the debt off for us.
Still DEAD is DEAD and there is nothing you can do.
LEFTWINGER supreme wrote:http://thenewdaily...
Gillard was such a clueless fucking idiot, but the above thinking is typical of the left.Imagine a wage earner, John, employed in the same job throughout the last 20 years. For a period in 2003 to 2007 every year his employer gave him a sizeable bonus. He was grateful but in his bones knew it wouldn’t last. The bonuses did stop and John was told that his income would rise by around five per cent each year over the years to come. That’s the basis for his financial plans. Now, very late, John has been told he won’t get those promised increases for the next few years – but his income will get back up after that to where he was promised it would be. What is John’s rational reaction? (If John had a brain, he wouldn't listen to the ALP for financial advice)
What is John’s rational reaction? To respond to this temporary loss of income by selling his home and car, dropping his private health insurance, replacing every second evening meal with two-minute noodles. (but no mention of reducing discretionary a spending) Of course not. A rational response would be to make some responsible (no) savings, to engage in some moderate (massive) borrowing, to get through to the time of higher income (with no idea if or when) with his family and lifestyle intact and then to use the higher income to pay off the extra borrowing undertaken in the lean years.![]()
And Malcolm continues to borrow $100M per day just like dick brain Rudd.Gillard was such a clueless fucking idiot, but the above thinking is typical of the left.
Yes, because Turnbull is a leftard and the left have infiltrated the Libs.Sir Bobby wrote:And Malcolm continues to borrow $100M per day just like dick brain Rudd.Gillard was such a clueless fucking idiot, but the above thinking is typical of the left.
IQS.RLOW wrote:Yes, because Turnbull is a leftard and the left have infiltrated the Libs.Sir Bobby wrote:And Malcolm continues to borrow $100M per day just like dick brain Rudd.Gillard was such a clueless fucking idiot, but the above thinking is typical of the left.
The senate is dominated by GRALPs and assorted other self absorbed independents and minor parties who refuse to pass saving measures.
Turnbull has to design policy around what is possible due to the senate road block. So it's half arsed, ineffective or plain fucking useless.
Anyone who voted for GRALPs in either house should be shot for treason.
Their stupidity is responsible for the state of the countries finances.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 87 guests