Storage-Batteries and Supercapacitors

[Outlaw Yogi]

BTW Yogi - take this to your PHd fellow about Volts. It may also assist you in simple terms

You take it to him, I don't trust vegetarians.

His name is Dr Sam Stainsby.

[Outlaw Yogi]

In yogi's thread now Pedo. Do you both look the same?

See my avatar? ... That's what I look like.
And I reckon if I walked up, tapped you on the shoulder and said "Hello wayne" you'd mess yourself.

the Boogeyman in wayne's dreams.jpg

[Wayne]

This is far as I've read, and as much as I need to know about the cavern in your skull.
My design is not "linear".
Now go copulate yourself halfwit!

so the truth comes out. You flog another man's invention and call it your own.

Can't you comprehend what you read idiot?!
All these devices are "induction" operated and require an external electrical input.
My invention relies solely on magnetic repulsion of 2 north poles on opposing magnets, and requires no external energy input of any sort.

If you understood the Linear Motor diagrams, you'd notice that they have north and south poles facing the rotor next to one another. My device has no south poles facing the rotor.
Laithwaite's design requires electronic control of current to the magnets facing the rotor so that one pulls and the next one pushes. I thought of that idea when I was 10, told my father and he said "It's already been done".
Years later I saw the concept used in rail guns. A typical assault rifle's projectile travels at around 2800ft per sec, any reasonable hunting rifle's projectile travels at about 3200ft per sec. A rail gun can propel a 1 ounce projectile at 20,000ft per sec.
That's enough to smash a tank (with no explosive material in projectile).
My design has no control of input current because there is none. It doesn't even have an on/off switch. It's started and stoped (by atrophy, no brake) by one of the simplest and oldest mechanical functions in existence.

The "pinching" of electrons though was a beauty!!!!

I take it you failed the colour perception/blindness test at high school? ... so never got to be an electrician.
If you understood the basic principles of electrical current (a flow of electrons) you'd know that stealing electrons from magnets in turbines and running them through a circuit before being allowed back home (the magnet) or earthed has been standard practice in electricity generation for eons.
If the electrons are earthed, the magnet draws in new electrons from the air (charged particles from the sun and cosmic radiation) to get back to normal/equilibrium.

RMIT had a good chuckle about that one!

Bullshit!
They'd tell you the same thing I just did.
The truth comes out alright .. you haven't got a clue what you're banging on about, and so lie about, and misrepresent others (RMIT).

Clearly you can't even comprehend Laithwaite's designs, let alone mine.

I take it you failed the colour perception/blindness test at high school? ... so never got to be an electrician.
If you understood the basic principles of electrical current (a flow of electrons) you'd know that stealing electrons from magnets in turbines and running them through a circuit before being allowed back home (the magnet) or earthed has been standard practice in electricity generation for eons.
If the electrons are earthed, the magnet draws in new electrons from the air (charged particles from the sun and cosmic radiation) to get back to normal/equilibrium.


OMG!!! Now I have read everything! You can't steal electrons from magnets Yogi. If YOU understood how a generator works YOU would understand that the magnetic field is supplied from an external DC source so the field can be controlled thus controlling the voltage. The armature rotates in this magnetic field and has EMF induced into it. In the case of a rotating armature machine, the EMF either runs through a commutator or slip rings
to produce AC, In a rotating field alternator, the armature is stationary, whilst the DC field rotates thus inducing EMF - but in no cases are the two connected - there is an air gap in between! How can electrons be stolen? You also cannot at this time replenish electrons form the air or other methods! You can SUPPLY them from a source that is being charged from another source (solar for instance) bu they are not readily available to be snatched from the air! Remember, voltage is PRESSURE. The higher the voltage, the more current will flow through a set resistance, alter the voltage or change the resistance and the current flow will change.

As for earthing, do you even understand earthing principles ? Single Wire Earth return IS a distribution method that is used in the outback to save on wires. As implied, the line is the active and the return path (the neutral if you like) is earth. But by far, the common way of distributing power is Mains Earth Neutral where the earth and neutral are tied together to provide a low impedance path, thus tripping the breaker should an earth fault occur. The reason ALL equipment is earthed is to prevent them becoming live and electrocuting people, They do not provide any path for return of electrons used in anything!

The rail gun, again, another invention by Professor Leithwaite is currently being trialled and used on the USS Zumwalt It looks like it will be an effective and cheap way of destroying most targets.

By the way Yogi, have you noticed you are using the same method of replying to my post that you had a go at me for? Embedding comments after each point works doesn't it? See? You are already following my lead on things!

[Wayne]

In yogi's thread now Pedo. Do you both look the same?

See my avatar? ... That's what I look like.
And I reckon if I walked up, tapped you on the shoulder and said "Hello wayne" you'd mess yourself.

the Boogeyman in wayne's dreams.jpg

Somehow sweetheart, I don't think so. In fact from what I have read, you would have trouble finding the farm gate to get out on the road.

[Outlaw Yogi]

If YOU understood how a generator works YOU would understand that the magnetic field is supplied from an external DC source

If you understood how a generator functions, you'd know magnets have their own magnetic field, and the rotation of magma in the Earth creates the magnetosphere because it acts like a generator.

Didn't pay much attention to the rest of your diatribe because it looked like you cut n' pasted it from googling.

If you understood anything of the material you've googled up, you'd be aware everything (including dead inanimate objects) is electric. It is the positive and negative charges in everything that hold matter together and sustains that objects equilibrium. When you extract/steal particles (in this case electrons) the substance/object must attract new electrons to maintain its equilibrium or it will deteriorate/decay... and decay itself is where something else/another substance absorbs/steals those particles. It's the factor that allows chemistry to exist.

I see so many misperceptions because the inexperienced take for granted pre-conceived ideas and misinformation.
For example most people think copper oxide is green, but it's not, it's black.
When copper oxide comes in contact with C02 it steals carbon from the C02 to become copper carbonate, which is green.

My advice wayne is stick to what you know, and I'm yet to see what you do know, just what you don't know but imagine or pretend you do.

[Wayne]

If YOU understood how a generator works YOU would understand that the magnetic field is supplied from an external DC source

If you understood how a generator functions, you'd know magnets have their own magnetic field, and the rotation of magma in the Earth creates the magnetosphere because it acts like a generator.

Didn't pay much attention to the rest of your diatribe because it looked like you cut n' pasted it from googling.

If you understood anything of the material you've googled up, you'd be aware everything (including dead inanimate objects) is electric. It is the positive and negative charges in everything that hold matter together and sustains that objects equilibrium. When you extract/steal particles (in this case electrons) the substance/object must attract new electrons to maintain its equilibrium or it will deteriorate/decay... and decay itself is where something else/another substance absorbs/steals those particles. It's the factor that allows chemistry to exist.

I see so many misperceptions because the inexperienced take for granted pre-conceived ideas and misinformation.
For example most people think copper oxide is green, but it's not, it's black.
When copper oxide comes in contact with C02 it steals carbon from the C02 to become copper carbonate, which is green.

My advice wayne is stick to what you know, and I'm yet to see what you do know, just what you don't know but imagine or pretend you do.

The fact that you did not even bother to read my post hoists you by your own petard Yogi. None is googled - it is all my own words and from my own background and knowledge. Just because an object has positive and negative charges, doesn't mean they are necessarily magnetic. The magnetic north pole is in the southern hemispere (proven by atomic detonations in the Van Allen belt in the 50s) That's why compasses are now called "north seeking" devices because when you are heading true north, you are actually heading magnetic south. All of that has little to do with magnetic fields, movement of charge, voltage as pressure in an electrical rotating machinery sense. In your original writings you wrote about "stealing electrons to sustain a magnetic field" that just can't happen Yogi. Maybe in some other area that I may not be aware of - but in the world of electrical - it is a fallacy. You don't even seem to understand the concept of earthing.

[Outlaw Yogi]

The fact that you did not even bother to read my post hoists you by your own petard Yogi.

I don't bother wasting time reading the majority of what you post because most of it is a repetitious waste of server space,
full of plagiarised googling and not particularly interesting.

[ None is googled - it is all my own words and from my own background and knowledge.

Bullshit!

[Wayne]

The fact that you did not even bother to read my post hoists you by your own petard Yogi.

I don't bother wasting time reading the majority of what you post because most of it is a repetitious waste of server space,
full of plagiarised googling and not particularly interesting.

[ None is googled - it is all my own words and from my own background and knowledge.

Bullshit!

Thank You Yog!, You cannot disprove anything I have said because you KNOW you are a technology THIEF! Take anything you like on what I have written in this topic to a subject matter expert of your choice and they will confirm what I have written - especially in the areas of generation, magnetism and it's behaviour, earthing and a host of others. Now, you may be very astute in some areas, I admire some of your forethought and postings in the political arena, but on technology - you are around first year electrical apprentice. You also definitely need to read up on basic fundamentals of electricity. I suggest you purchase the latest copy of Jenneson from the link below. It is available in electronic edition as well.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=c ... s+jenneson

No win today, but take a consolation lollipop from the glass jar

[IQS.RLOW]

So you're just a low level sparky or cable monkey?

[Outlaw Yogi]

Thank You Yog!, You cannot disprove anything I have said because you KNOW you are a technology THIEF!

Is that right fluffy bunny?

Well if that's the case, then you should be able to google up something resembling my design.

So off you go. Go find a combined motor and generator with no electrical or mechanical input that relies on magnetic repulsion alone to obtain both kinetic and electrical output.

Should be quite a challenge since none exist yet.

And when you fail, I will have disproved EVERYTHING you've claimed, just by default.