cods wrote: he can always claim.. she started it.. shes dead .. who can argue with him..
The audio recording, that's who, but it doesn't. The recording supports his version of events.
cods wrote:you have someone saying they would have dragged her to the kerb and left her to bleed in the gutter.
You better believe it, if someone wants to use violence, I respond with violence.
One woman accused me of something that never happened to obtain an AVO, then searched 2 pubs to abuse and assault me while I was restrained in a bear hug. I sent her flying across the room with a front kick to her sternum.
Another punched me in the face and throat while I was trying to sleep. She wound up with a broken nose, 2 black eyes, a fat lip, bruises on her neck and a bald patch on her head.
cods wrote: that happens to be DOMESTIC VIOLENCE...
No it was a blind date from a dating app called Tinder.
To qualify as DV, she would have to live with him for 3 months first.
cods wrote:if I was a mod here I would be asking WHY is this person allowed to spew his violence on pa....
And that's evidence enough to illustrate you don't have the intellect to qualify as a mod for PA.
I can vomit whatever you perceive to be violent because the topic/issue regards a bloke being put on trial for being a victim of a violent sheila.
cods wrote:even pa must have a limit surely???..
No sorry Dingbat, we value our freedom of expression here, and defend it vehemently.
All those who've tried to restrict our freedom of expression have failed and gone off to start their own mutual appreciation societies.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?