Arctic Ice Fails to follow Warmist Doctrine

[White Indigene]

Yeah,

Thats why the governmint pursues me; oh and me mate Hoges.

Anyhow, have a Winfeild.

[Swami Dring]

This thread seems like little more than a grab for attention by Broken Drum. So be it. The member has issues.

Nevertheless, I have read similar posts by seemingly ingenuous contributors who have voiced similar thoughts.

The beauty of the small world created by the technologcal and communications age in which we live is that bullshit cannot be sustained.

The fact that all scientific theories are peer-reviewed on an unprecedented global basis means that if 90%+ of the world's scientific community is in agreement on a particular subject, then by god you can take it to the bank.

[JW Frogen]

The fact that all scientific theories are peer-reviewed on an unprecedented global basis means that if 90%+ of the world's scientific community is in agreement on a particular subject, then by god you can take it to the bank.

Do you know how many bank failures there have been recently?

Peers like to give good reviews to peers who can give them promotion or tenor.

[Swami Dring]

Let's not confuse economics with science.

[JW Frogen]

Let's not confuse economics with science.

Indeed.

There is not relationship between the two, unlike enviormentalism and religion.

[skippy]

"Sure, there might be a problem, but it is by no measure weighted against human inhabitance. And, as ususal, Lefties fly in the face of science, no matter the magnitude of it, to impart their own version of a godless universe which man will destroy, not the other way around."

MMM, a god botherer and a conspironut, thats all we need.
So the ALP are convincing the worlds scientists about global warming, LOL.
How about you tell us what the ALP have to gain from from this? this will be good.

[White Indigene]

Nevertheless, I have read similar posts by seemingly ingenuous contributors who have voiced similar thoughts.

The beauty of the small world created by the technologcal and communications age in which we live is that bullshit cannot be sustainoed.
d converting them inot a n
The fact that all scientific theories are peer-reviewed on an unprecedented global basis means that if 90%+ of the world's scientific community is in agreement on a particular subject, then by god you can take it to the bank.

Your lips move Dring, but you say nought.

Or am I to beleive that you are to be personally held to account for your outragous and wrongful Carbon Footprint; or are you capable yourself of reveiwng numbers as small as 2 +2, in a non-partisan assesment of you presence here on this planet v the environs?

Please own up Dringy, as you know you should. Oh, and please consider how might your own comments re the subject ought be peer reviewed. Bias is not, you know, the exclusive domain of the Right, Left or Center.

Do you think you as a person (in theory), have the enourmous power required to effect the environs here on earth, in a way more larger than any celestial entity, be that solid, liquid, gas or theorised.

In answer any of the above suppositions, you would immediately prove your actuall existance as an autonomus individual livng free, as opposed to an esoteric party-political climate skeptic.

I'll be silent for now.

[White Indigene]

How about you tell us what the ALP have to gain from from this? this will be good.

I know it can be hard, but reading what is 'actually' written, as opposed to what you think you read, sometimes works to replace what you thought you read, with what you actually read.

Its sort of like understanding what was said, as opposed to what wasnt; to put it another way, if you saw words, they would have a meaning, and as long as you have the key to the meaning of The Word, you get what was written. If you dont have they key, you wont understand the word; or for that matter open the door to life, and go on through.

It is really, the diffence between peeing with the wind, or against it. Or farting in the same manner.

Either way, science explains all the results adequately, even if dribble dont come from normal channels.

[skippy]

How about you tell us what the ALP have to gain from from this? this will be good.

I know it can be hard, but reading what is 'actually' written, as opposed to what you think you read, sometimes works to replace what you thought you read, with what you actually read.

Its sort of like understanding what was said, as opposed to what wasnt; to put it another way, if you saw words, they would have a meaning, and as long as you have the key to the meaning of The Word, you get what was written. If you dont have they key, you wont understand the word; or for that matter open the door to life, and go on through.

It is really, the diffence between peeing with the wind, or against it. Or farting in the same manner.

Either way, science explains all the results adequately, even if dribble dont come from normal channels.

Yep, that makes as much sense as any of your other posts.
I note you could not answer my simple question, so there fore will assume your asertion the ALP are behind the world wide climate change conspiracy you assert, is absolute bullshit, why didn't you just say it was bullshit to begin with? it could have saved much time.

[White Indigene]

[
Yep, that makes as much sense as any of your other posts.
I note you could not answer my simple question, so there fore will assume your asertion the ALP are behind the world wide climate change conspiracy you assert, is absolute bullshit, why didn't you just say it was bullshit to begin with? it could have saved much time.

Well, see, its not that that the ALP is BS, or that the climate argument as proffered is a little BS, its just that the Enviro-terror as proffered by the ALP, is mostly BS.

As for what they might gain, well look at it this way -one begetts the other. By beleiveng the scam, Labor plays host to an encapsulated audience, prepared to shed anything in order to make safe their immediate environs. Hence Labor has the voters. Being the new Nanny-God, Labor is positioned to grant the wishes of the people in return for compliance with the demands of the ALP think-tank. One might get less payrolltax (a vote winner), or cheaper beer, or more petrol per dollar. All one need do is comply with the demands of the arty.

No matter if the science wrong, because the Party will always project the correct outlook.

But back to the science; in challenging the Labor concensus on the matter, exposes simply the truth, not the answer. The answer is easy and well known. It is only the party-political positions being battled.

ASIMOV as environmental doctrine, ala Labor, is old, and simply brings the country back to 1979. As expected. This leaves us thirty years behind in answering the problem, and has by no means edvanced our position in the environs. Labor cant shift the environs, only the vote.

But by picking the wrong science (for argument sake) Labor locks us into its future, and not the orbit of the true facts; the facts become as dicated by the party-political. In choosing the current GW model, labor excises all the other prosletysing by ASIMOV, and embraces the earth bound concensus, for there is no God but the Nanny-God party state.

Going further, if the nations is committed, as it will soon be, to to the wrong method, and the wrong solutions dictated, disaster will ensue, and the scientific consesus agrees with that scaremongering.

And whilst the Labor geek(s) seek glory for the party in the scientific world, they ignore the full potential of ASIMOV as Climate Doctrine.

Perhaps ASIOMV is like Cadel Evans, a Righty.