Spook censorship

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:19 pm

Seems some agency doesn't like what I write on a number of topics/issue/subjects, and so prevents my posting in some threads.
Started a while back concerning anything to do with Muslims.
Then it was Redneck's thread about Baird banning Greyhound racing.
I have copied and saved articles to post to that thread regarding Baird's corrupt agenda to sell dog tracks to developers.

Noe I can't post to 'Not on our watch'
http://ozpolitic.com/polanimal/viewtopi ... =2&t=13902" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
because it concerns a Muslim stabbing backpackers.

SN wrote "Kill the bastard"
I say "Liberate all Muslims from Islam" and if that means killing them, so be it.
It's pretty obvious they need to be evicted from this planet.

So dear spooks at whatever agency (probably DSD) ... get this up ya

Allah is donkey shit

Muhammad was a goat fucker!
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:43 pm

Now it seems I'm not allowed to post in any thread containing a religious element or theme, rather than just being prevented from slagging off Muslims.

I cannot post on AnaTom's dictator.vicgov.au thread.

http://ozpolitic.com/polanimal/viewtopi ... =2&t=13905" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is what I wrote in reply to AnaTom.

The name/title of the Doomsday prophecy I had in mind in known as 'The Rapture'.
Apparently it was created by some American evangelist (in the 70s I think) and was popular with born again Jesus freaks
when I was a teen in the 80s.
So while not technically biblical, the impression I got is it was/is a mish mash of joining dots from Revelation.
The main features of this scenario is that Jesus would return and magically make all the good Christians vanish from the face of the Earth - "The rapture" - and the rest of us sinners would be compulsorily "marked" on our hands or foreheads.

Righto AT, from your posting it's pretty clear you're obsessed with biblical stuff.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the 'Apocolypse of St John' supposedly written on the Greek island of Patmos in the 2nd century AD a part of Revelations?

Now what would you say if I told you that the 'Apocolypse of St John' is a shortened plagiarism of the Hindu epic 'Markandeya Purana'?
Or that the 3 core precepts of Christianity advised by Jesus - forgiveness/turn the other cheek and love thy enemy/neighbour are Buddhist? and judge not lest ye be judged - is Tibetan Bon Po?
Or that pretty much every other Christian concept is Hindu? ... Trimurties bacame the Trinity, Adi Shakti became Holy Ghost, Resurection of Ganesh reproduced as resurection of Jesus, Hindu sainthood adopted by Catholocism ect ect ect

I'm not saying Christianity is bad per se, just that its doctrines and dogmas are not originally or exclusively Christian.

BTW, according to the Rig Veda I'm the sort of character who should be prevented from reading the Vedas (Hindu texts) because I challenge religious belief/faith.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:56 pm

Now it seems having bitch about their censorship has got them to change tact ... still frustratingly slooooow though
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Neferti » Fri Aug 26, 2016 4:11 pm

Don't you need to go to the Library (or somewhere) to get access to a computer and Internet? Possibly that place is the problem.

Regarding Muslims. This joke came through to me the other day. :rofl
Scottish Diplomacy

One thing about blokes from Scotland is that their hearts and humour are always in the right place! Jimmy MacDonald, a City Councillor from Glasgow, was asked on a local live radio talk show, just what he thought about the allegations of torture of suspected terrorists. His reply prompted his ejection from the studio, but to thunderous applause from the audience.

HIS STATEMENT: 'If hooking up one rag-head terrorist's testicles to a car battery gets the truth out of the lying little camel shagger to save just one Scottish soldier’s life, then I have only three things to say; Red is positive, Black is negative and make sure his nuts are wet.’
:rofl :rofl

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Spook censorship

Post by freediver » Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:09 am

Keep sticking it to the man Yogi. You can win this.

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:23 pm

Neferti~ wrote:Don't you need to go to the Library (or somewhere) to get access to a computer and Internet? Possibly that place is the problem.
Depends on the computer I'm using.

If I use my laptop through the public WiFi, which of course is vulnerable to hacking, and the laptop's security has claimed to have prevented such attempts twice in Gin Gin, I can only currently access this site due to having created a short-cut direct link on my desk-top. Access to google or yahoo is currently blocked to this lap-top, and has been for at least a month, despite having a computer repair shop do a virus scan and/or clean up on it.

If I use a library or internet cafe computer I get access for a while, and then depending on what I write regarding particular topics, the access is limited and increadibly slow, as if being re-routed for monitoring by an agency tasked with protecting the current protected species status of Muslims in this country.

Access to this site via my laptop is allowed, except to topics where I've made comments politically correct thought police regard as inflamitory.

Annoying as it is, I'm not that concerned, it is the PC issue PR managers who've tasked spook agencies with such activity who should be worried, because by silencing public debate or opinions they can't tolerate, they generate public backlash that can and probably will manifest a fascist revolution.

Y'see when govt & bureaucratic social engineers manage to make myth/fallacy into feigned/perceived consensus belief I don't waste my energy fighting it, I just let it fail/crumble due to its own lack of merit. Sometimes that takes years, but it always happens.
For example the common public sentiment to Muslim behaviour in our society which our govt now deems needs protecting I was ranting about 20 odd years ago.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:31 pm

freediver wrote:Keep sticking it to the man Yogi.
Exposure to dodgey activities, which govts have always claimed exclusive right to do, can be effective depending on how much it's publicly noticed.
You can win this.
No, eventually they'll lose this, as the number of people expressing the same sentiments I am increases to a critical mass.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Neferti » Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:56 pm

Golly gosh, Freediver made a real post on PA ...... :shock:

Can anyone guess what the topic was? :rofl

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:19 pm

Well it seems I'm still not allowed to post in topic concerning Muslims .. eg Not on our Watch and Bombing the Infidel.

In 'Not on our Watch AnaTom posed the question "Is it naughty to offend Muslims?"
My answer "Apparently so"

For example a young Arab French backpacker stabs multiple people and a dog yelling "Allah Hu Akbar".
But the Qld Commissioner of Police says "It had nothing to do with religion or race".
And now claims he was infatuated with the victim.
I would theorise it was about both religion and race.
The perpetrator chanted his religion's mantra while killing and maiming, and Arab Muslims tend to be fucked in the head - due to inbreeding.

I find it ironic I'm prevented from stating so in the relevant threads, meanwhile on the front page of today's Bundaberg News-Mail
is a photo of a rag head claiming someone tried to deliberately run her over.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Spook censorship

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:29 pm

I'm wondering if Muslims are brought into this and Westernised countries to cause trouble and split the community into yes and no camps, so that official bodies have a mandate to make us live in a police/surveilance state?

Because it's quite obvious there's no good reason to bring such people here, so it must be for a bad reason.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests