Same Sex Marriage Plebiscite

[Super Nova]

cocksuckers are NOT normal.

Hold on..... for men you mean only, I assume.

[Black Orchid]

cocksuckers are NOT normal.

Almost spat my drink at that LOL

[Neferti]

THIS is PA .... I would never, ever use such language down at the local shopping centre or in NICE company.

I recall being extremely shocked when my sister referred to another sister's son as having a "cocksuckers mouth". He IS a homosexual but his parents didn't believe it for years .... they do now.

[Rorschach]

I guess my main concern is that we are going to spend $160 million on a plebiscite that is non binding anyway. What if the people say Yes, and elements of the Coalition/Labor/etc say NO - or vice versa.

Let it be held in Parliament where the decision is binding either way. $160 million would buy a lot of healthcare, pensions and roads and rail

Oh dear, if it isn't the shallow and brainwashed speaking out.

All of us need to have a say in this... this is a major change to our society and millenia of tradition. You don't let 150 political morons change your society, just as we shouldn't be changing marriage and what it means for a minority of a minority.

The pleb will allow once and for all the Australian people to have a say on this issue... wassup? don't like democracy? Convert to Islam then.

[Neferti]

Vic is a leftard and lives in Victoria .... calls himself BIG Vic possibly because he is around 5'5" and 100 kilos. The weight is where the BIG comes in.

[IQS.RLOW]

I guess my main concern is that we are going to spend $160 million on a plebiscite that is non binding anyway. What if the people say Yes, and elements of the Coalition/Labor/etc say NO - or vice versa.

Let it be held in Parliament where the decision is binding either way. $160 million would buy a lot of healthcare, pensions and roads and rail

Straight from the Neo-Marxist/ALP/Getfuckedup song book

Lefties are lol of a sudden worried about spending money

[Neferti]

I guess my main concern is that we are going to spend $160 million on a plebiscite that is non binding anyway. What if the people say Yes, and elements of the Coalition/Labor/etc say NO - or vice versa.

Let it be held in Parliament where the decision is binding either way. $160 million would buy a lot of healthcare, pensions and roads and rail

Straight from the Neo-Marxist/ALP/Getfuckedup song book

Lefties are lol of a sudden worried about spending money

Yep, a leftard. Although he forgot EDUCATION.

[Lord Sir BigVic VSD and Bar]

I guess my main concern is that we are going to spend $160 million on a plebiscite that is non binding anyway. What if the people say Yes, and elements of the Coalition/Labor/etc say NO - or vice versa.

Let it be held in Parliament where the decision is binding either way. $160 million would buy a lot of healthcare, pensions and roads and rail

Oh dear, if it isn't the shallow and brainwashed speaking out.

All of us need to have a say in this... this is a major change to our society and millenia of tradition. You don't let 150 political morons change your society, just as we shouldn't be changing marriage and what it means for a minority of a minority.

The pleb will allow once and for all the Australian people to have a say on this issue... wassup? don't like democracy? Convert to Islam then.

A plebiscite is a non binding arrangement that may not allow the wishes of the people to be heard. Some members of the coalition have already publicly stated they will not support a yes vote. So 160 million may be wasted because politicians may use their personal beliefs to over ride a public majority vote. But you knew that, didn't you?

[Lord Sir BigVic VSD and Bar]

Vic is a leftard and lives in Victoria .... calls himself BIG Vic possibly because he is around 5'5" and 100 kilos. The weight is where the BIG comes in.

I love it when the girls get upset!

[Neferti]

I guess my main concern is that we are going to spend $160 million on a plebiscite that is non binding anyway. What if the people say Yes, and elements of the Coalition/Labor/etc say NO - or vice versa.

Let it be held in Parliament where the decision is binding either way. $160 million would buy a lot of healthcare, pensions and roads and rail

Oh dear, if it isn't the shallow and brainwashed speaking out.

All of us need to have a say in this... this is a major change to our society and millenia of tradition. You don't let 150 political morons change your society, just as we shouldn't be changing marriage and what it means for a minority of a minority.

The pleb will allow once and for all the Australian people to have a say on this issue... wassup? don't like democracy? Convert to Islam then.

A plebiscite is a non binding arrangement that may not allow the wishes of the people to be heard. Some members of the coalition have already publicly stated they will not support a yes vote. So 160 million may be wasted because politicians may use their personal beliefs to over ride a public majority vote. But you knew that, didn't you?

What about the children?