Global Warming

[IQS.RLOW]

I was using weather as an example. I know it is not climate.

The simplest theory for global warming in my view is:

Total Energy in Climate = Existing Energy in Climate + Energy released from the Earth core + Energy from Outside Earth - Energy radiated or reflected back into space

By climate I mean the system above the earths crust that include seas and land.

Simple.

If Energy radiated or reflected back into space is reduced the energy in the climate goes up.

You argue that because the models were wrong the theory is wrong. At the simplest level the theory is sound.

Do you deny this?

Why are you ignoring the science that says that say that the energy must be going somewhere else considering the CO2 levels have spiked and there has been no corresponding increase in temp?

Why do you ignore this fact every time, denier?

[IQS.RLOW]

I really get sick of throwing the same shit at you time and time agains, and you do nothing but chow down and eat it and regurgitate the same rubbish time and time again.

Why are you such a denier, SN?

[AiA in Atlanta]

This should help with your *manstruation* IQ but it won't do anything to alleviate climate change:

[IQS.RLOW]

You're as funny as a fart in an elevator, you Obama nigger nutsack swinger.

[Rorschach]

I was using weather as an example. I know it is not climate.

The simplest theory for global warming in my view is:

Total Energy in Climate = Existing Energy in Climate + Energy released from the Earth core + Energy from Outside Earth - Energy radiated or reflected back into space

By climate I mean the system above the earths crust that include seas and land.

Simple.

If Energy radiated or reflected back into space is reduced the energy in the climate goes up.

You argue that because the models were wrong the theory is wrong. At the simplest level the theory is sound.

Do you deny this?

Oh so now we have a caveat... AT THE SIMPLEST LEVEL... Yes, it may well be, but climate is not simple... any sane person would, deny the Theory is sound and the models are correct.
The claim is that Anthropogenic Global Warming is causing catastrophic climate change. The the theory is that Carbon Dioxide (plant food) is the main cause of Global Warming and that it is Man's contribution that is the cause of catastrophic warming.
Here's a simple theory for you... the sky is blue therefore it is made of Turquoise... ostensibly wrong... no?
CO2 levels have been increasing, the major contributor to those levels is NATURAL Emissions, yet Global temperature have not been rising for 18 years. The theory would have temps continue to rise proportionally. Therefore the theory is wrong. I've been telling you climate is vast and complex so please don't start lecturing me about it, I know how it works.

[IQS.RLOW]

[skippy]

Yea IQ has a way with words, he should write love songs.

[Outlaw Yogi]

It's really simple. The science is correct, and you churchy fuckers are wrong ... always wrong.

And that's why these psuedo-christian fundamentalist doom-seekers make up pretend science, because they can't comprehend real science. All they know is that science makes them look stupid because they believe in fairy tales.

For 2 decades now the psuedo-christian fundamentalists have been denying ad infintium in the face of overwhelming evidence, and spruiking moonbat theories which get debunked in about 10 minutes, and are yet to come up with a plausible alternate explanation for why the atmospheric and oceanic temps keep rising, and why polar and glacial regions are causing ocean levels to rise.

Instead we get half-witted denialism with claims "It's not happening".
Well tell that to Venetian tourist industry who are watching Venice being dissolved by salt from the ocean the psuedo-christian churchies say aren't rising.

[IQS.RLOW]

It's got nothing to do with "churchy" motherfuckers.

It the left, so desperate for some kind of religion in their lives, they have adopted Gaia as their Lord and saviour and sinners (as they see it) against their beloved God will be punished in fire and brimstone (global warming) so they must repent their sins (buy carbon credits and champion a carbon tax) or their children will suffer an even worse fate.

The left have become the churchy motherfuckers.

Boogedaboogedaboogeda

[Outlaw Yogi]

It's got nothing to do with "churchy" motherfuckers.

It the left, so desperate for some kind of religion in their lives, they have adopted Gaia as their Lord and saviour and sinners (as they see it) against their beloved God will be punished in fire and brimstone (global warming) so they must repent their sins (buy carbon credits and champion a carbon tax) or their children will suffer an even worse fate.

The left have become the churchy motherfuckers.

Boogedaboogedaboogeda

GW denialism has everything to do with churchies because these days GW dinalism is exclusively a psuedo-christian doomsday cultist phenomena who peddle the myth that GW is a scam, and for decades now have been trying to invoke an apocalypse via Armageddon in the perverse belief that Jesus will come back to save them. One prime example is a collection of right wing moonbat jesus freaks called Christians United for Israel who continually advocate nuclear war against Iran.

Those using inferences of Gaia are the ones pushing nuclear energy as a supposed carbon free saviour, as if uranium enrichment (required for light water reactors) wasn't carbon intensive.

The pro-nuke spruikers (eg writer of 'Revenge of Gaia) should actually read the story before using mythology as their metaphor.

Gaia mated with her son Uranus to give birth to Cronos, the Titans and the Hecatoncheires.
Uranus considered his offspring the Hecatoncheires so horrible he threw them deep into the Earth and buried them. Gaia had Cronos castrate Uranus. The Titans dug up the Heactoncheries and used them as weapons which could move mountains when waging war.