celebrity puppies v humans

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7259
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

celebrity puppies v humans

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Fri May 22, 2015 3:48 am

i think they should be called just "boat people" ...

Image

The premise of this piece is that Australian authorities treated Johnny Depp's dogs better than it does actual humans, specifically asylum seekers, and that Aussies are generally bigots and politicians make good use of that:
But instead of mocking Australia for its callous treatments of a celebrity’s puppies, the international community should be shaming my homeland for its appalling treatment of human asylum seekers. Sure, the Depp story is entertaining, but it’s a distraction from Australia’s insular turn and the deep-seated xenophobia that politicians exploit when selling hardline immigration policies to the public.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1218 ... ual-humans

Any thoughts?

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by mantra » Fri May 22, 2015 9:03 am

It comes as no surprise that many people prefer animals to humans. Cute little dogs owned by famous movie stars would definitely take precedence over sinister looking refugees.

Take for example the current influx of Rohingya Muslims seeking refuge - few countries give a stuff about them and they are being treated no better than a plague of rodents. Even the Muslim countries appear to be shunning them. A humanitarian crisis means less to our government than starving cattle in outback Australia during a drought. It all comes down to the holy dollar and how various species on this planet affect our economy.

Image

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by Neferti » Fri May 22, 2015 9:37 am

:rofl :rofl

Image

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by Rorschach » Fri May 22, 2015 3:34 pm

Any thoughts?
It was written by a Dickhead... :roll:

As for Depp's dogs... that was a huge beatup created and kept going by LW Prog Dickheads
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by skippy » Sat May 23, 2015 12:16 pm

I don't care about Depp's dogs. I am concerned third world countries are using Australia as an example of why they should not accept asylum seeking refugees though.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by freediver » Sat May 23, 2015 12:40 pm

Our approach is not a refusal to accept refugees. It is a refusal to accept human trafficking.

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat May 23, 2015 12:50 pm

It's time people starting sorting out their problems in their homeland in their homeland, instead of importing their problems to other countries.

As far as Myanmese/Burmese Buddhists persecuting Rohingya muslims goes, I can't blame them. The Rohingyas used to be called 'Karen' who came from Bangladesh (formely part of India) and ran much of the opium/heroin trade in the Golden Triangle in their now 60 year war against Myanmar/Burma.

It's a bit like the Tamils from India who went to Sri Lanka and then decided to carve a piece out for themselves, so initiated a decades long civil war, and then cried foul once they lost.

The Karen/Rohingya should either go back to Bangladesh or assimilate into the Burmese/Mayanmese culture by ditching Islam.
And the Tamils in Sri Lanka should go back to India or assimilate into Sri Lankan culture by ditching Hinduism.

Boatpeople ‘labourers’ not Rohingya: Indonesia
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 7366019824
Indonesia has told Australia that most of the 7000 boatpeople stranded at sea in the region are not Rohingya asylum-seekers but illegal labourers from Bangladesh.

In a foreign ministers’ meeting in Seoul yesterday, Indonesian offic­ials told Foreign Minister Julie Bishop that only 30 per cent to 40 per cent of those stranded on boats and in camps in the region were Rohingya refugees.

“They (Indonesia) believe there are about 7000 people at sea (and) they think about 30-40 per cent are Rohingya, the rest are Bangladeshi; and they are not, in Indon­esia’s words, asylum-seekers, they are not refugees, they are illegal labour­ers, they’ve been promised or are seeking jobs in Malaysia,” Ms Bishop told The Weekend ­Australian.

South-East Asia migrant crisis: Julie Bishop told by Indonesia most of 7,000 people stranded are illegal labourers, not refugees
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-23/b ... rs/6491836

“They said the Rohingya have gone to Bangladesh and have mixed up with the Bangladeshis who are coming to Malaysia in particular for jobs.”

She said the Indonesian repre­sentative at the so-called MIKTA meeting in Seoul, Hasan Kleib, Indones­ia’s Director-General of Multilateral Affairs, said one boatload of 600 people was found to have 400 Bangladeshis aboard.

Ms Bishop, who called this week for the international community to ratchet up pressure on Myanmar, described Indonesia’s comments as “very pointed ... they said that’s what their intelligence had informed them”.

With world attention now turning to Myanmar’s role in the regional migration crisis, its navy carried out its first rescue of an ­asylum-seeker boat, bringing 208 people to shore.

“A navy ship found two boats … on May 21 while on patrol,” said Tin Maung Swe, a senior official in the western state of Rakhine, adding “about 200 Bengalis were on one of the boats”.

The revelation that many of those seeking refuge are economic migrants came as Tony Abbott maintained his refusal to resettle any stranded Rohingyas in Australia. “I will say or do nothing to encourage people to take to the sea in boats and any suggestion that there is some kind of special resettlement program here in Australia for people taking to the sea in boats just encourages people-smuggling,’’ the Prime Minister said.

“So it would be utterly irresponsible of me or anyone to suggest for a second that we will reward people for doing something so dangerous.’’

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton also hit back at criticism that Australia was not doing enough to help the thousands stranded at sea, many for more than 40 days with scarce supplies of food and water.

Australia provided, by way of donor support, the largest amount of money to the International Organ­isation for Migration and the UN refugee agency in Indonesia, Mr Dutton said.

“We cannot be in a situation, having the most generous human­itarian program in the world, to then say, or to pretend cruelly to people, that we can somehow take millions of people from regions around the world, who would be displaced. We just can’t do that,” he said.

Australia has contributed $170 million to the IOM since 2000, including $40m this year, Ms Bishop said.

More than 3000 asylum-seekers­ caught up in the unfolding human drama have already landed in Indonesia and Malaysia, and at least 100 in Thailand.

Only Rohingyas are being given a one-year temporary ­shelter, while Bangladeshis face repat­riation.

For decades, Myanmar’s 1.1 million Rohingya have suffered from state-sanctioned discrimination in majority Buddhist Myanmar.

Denied citizenship by national law, they are effectively stateless. Indonesia hopes its claims about the majority of the boatpeople being economic migrants rather than genuine asylum-seekers will reduce criticism of its turning back of boats and its handling of the human­itarian crisis.

Ms Bishop said regional pressure on Myanmar as a source country of the boatpeople had intensified and she welcomed a decis­ion by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to hold a special meeting on the issue, which ASEAN member Myanmar will attend. She also welcomed the decision by the Malaysian and Indon­esian foreign ministers to travel to Myanmar to ask that government to do more to prevent the outflow of Rohingya refugees.

Both Indonesia and Australia used the MIKTA meeting, a five-country middle-power grouping that includes South Korea, Turkey and Mexico, to discuss the refugee crisis in the region and in the ­Middle East.

Despite Indonesia’s earlier criticism of Mr Abbott’s refusal to consider taking Rohingya refugees, Ms Bishop said Indonesia did not criticise Australia’s stand at the meeting yesterday.

“No one raised any questions about the Prime Minister’s comments,’’ Ms Bishop said referring to Mr Abbott’s “Nope, nope, nope” response to whether he would consider allowing Rohingya boatpeople into Australia.

The Reuters news agency reported that state media in Yangon had quoted Myanmar’s military commander-in-chief. Min Aung Hlaing. as saying some “boatpeople’’ were probably pretending to be Rohingya to receive aid.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by Rorschach » Sat May 23, 2015 2:13 pm

Yep been saying that for years too... go home fix your own problems, make your own future.

Mind you if the useless UN did their job properly problems like these would be getting fixed or not exist in the first place.

Muslims ASs/Refs should be resettled in Muslim Nations... better for them, much better for us.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: celebrity puppies v humans

Post by boxy » Sat May 23, 2015 8:19 pm

AiA in Atlanta wrote:The premise of this piece is that Australian authorities treated Johnny Depp's dogs better than it does actual humans, specifically asylum seekers...
What? Telling the mutts to piss off back home, or face summary execution is worse than resettling them elsewhere?
AiA in Atlanta wrote:... and that Aussies are generally bigots and politicians make good use of that
Derr. People are generally bigots, and politicians are generally populist fluffy bunnies.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests