The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Why not just use YouTube?
- AiA in Atlanta
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Harry will be at Sydney Harbour soon giving away Royal kisses to the ladies if any of you are interested.
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Please confine your baseless slander to the plebeians, from now on, AiA. The proletariat are the only ones who involve themselves in bastardrymellie wrote:Seriously, snap out of it AiA... you royal hater.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- AiA in Atlanta
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Wonder how my comments pegged me as a "royal hater" in the eyes of mel? I am not that at all ... and besides, the royal family has always been full of "bastardry" and infidelity.boxy wrote:Please confine your baseless slander to the plebeians, from now on, AiA. The proletariat are the only ones who involve themselves in bastardrymellie wrote:Seriously, snap out of it AiA... you royal hater.
-
- Posts: 10255
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
AiA in Atlanta wrote:There are plenty of James Hewitt - Harry photographs online that suggest otherwise. And then there is the hair: Harry isn't losing it like the rest of the Windsor men.
Really AiA, not balding did you say?
Sorry ...but he's a Windsor through 'n through, as is his chin, and the distinctive bony formation on the bridge of both his and his father Charles' nose.
Royal haters will always hate.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
-
- Posts: 10255
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Incase you missed it...
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Because in text I can highlight the most relevant line/s.Neferti~ wrote:Why not just use YouTube?
God save the Queen
The fascist regime,
They made you a moron
A potential H-bomb
And idiots will always worship.mellie wrote:
Royal haters will always hate.
Even when their idols are inbred.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Sorry, Yogi, I missed the highlighted bit. By the way, I voted YES to Australia becoming a Republic, so guess I can be called a Republican and NOT a Monarchist, although I think QE2 is a dear old soul.Outlaw Yogi wrote:Because in text I can highlight the most relevant line/s.Neferti~ wrote:Why not just use YouTube?
God save the Queen
The fascist regime,
They made you a moron
A potential H-bomb
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Royal Birth
Neferti~ wrote: Sorry, Yogi, I missed the highlighted bit. By the way, I voted YES to Australia becoming a Republic, so guess I can be called a Republican and NOT a Monarchist, although I think QE2 is a dear old soul.
No worries.
I've always been in favour of OZ becoming a republic, because I think having a foreigner as head of state for a nation rather than a colony implies national immaturity. In the 90s I even had a Eureka flag sticker on my car rear window to display my desire for a break away from mother England. But I voted "No" (was enrolled at the time) to the republic referenda because I think if we're going to have a president as head of state, we should use the directly elected model (like France & USA) rather than Malcolm Turnbull's propsed Politicians' republic.
Our constitution is a rather well set out document considering the era in which it was drafted, so if we're to alter/change/modify or replace it, the process should be done with forethought rather than for just change itself, or for Malcolm Turnbull to have an opportunity to achieve his water privatisation agenda (for foreign banks) by removing section 100 (in chapter 4, under finance & trade) which explicitly prohibits the commonwealth from interfering with the states ownership of our rivers and catchments.
According to my fuckwit mother, so I don't know if is actually true, my maternal great great grandmother was Lady in wating to the Queen (don't know which queen). But AFAIC a domestic servant with an aristcratic title is just a lackey in fancy garb.
And for the benefit of Royal worshipers who would view me as a royal hater, I would say, I don't hate them per se, I just have contempt for the monarchist concept, and if I want to hate, I'll hate the whole world if it suits me.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests