Government needs to tighten food standards &Importation laws

[Rorschach]

My original post wanker…

“Not sure why mel is carrying on in boxy's post... it is policy for both major party to enter into free trade agreements.

One Nation was the only party actively working against them when Hanson was in Parliament.

Emerson was all for free trade and only ON stood up and debated him in public forums. Mind you he just did what he always did... moth propaganda and platitudes.

Of course we should hold others to high standards like ours and if they fall short we should not be forced to enter into agreements that allows those standards to be lowered.”

You said…

“Incorrect. Joe Bryant (right winger) and the Greens (left wingers) were the only entities opposing FTAs. Hanson never said "Boo" about the issue.”

Joe Bryant wasn’t in parliament nor was he a party or part of one in federal parliament. The Greens & Dems, as I stated, only came to the party after Hanson and ON made the issue public news and fought against the GATS and the MAI.

You said Hanson never said “Boo” I have more than proved you a liar and ignorant and wrong.

[Rorschach]

Economic rationalists say;
Quote:
“Protectionism is a thing of the past. Tariff barriers have to be taken down. Free market, globalisation, deregulation, privatisation, the "level" playing field.”

Economic rationalism has run riot under both Liberal and Labor. Australian manufacturing and other industries have been destroyed. Is that good planning for our future?

One Nation have policies to rebuild Australian manufacturing industries and primary industries.

Value adding to products should be done, by Australians in Australia.

Industries in their infancy benefit from protectionism. This is a well known fact.

Is providing protection for new industries or those yet unable to compete with bigger, older companies backward looking? Or is it building a future for Australia and Australians?

One Nation backed the Union call for “Fair Trade” not “Free Trade.” Did the Unions back One Nation?

One Nation opposed the MAI and opposes GATS. It understands it will undermine Australia’s sovereignty and Australian workers rights. Is this looking backwards?
Or just looking after Australians?

If the major parties had their way the MAI would have been accepted. If they have their way, GATS will be accepted. If that happens then everyone will be looking
back in a few years... wondering how it happened. Will they then say... One Nation was right we should have listened
Posted by T800, Sunday, 1 October 2006 12:02:13 PM

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/threa ... =77&page=4

if you actually read the stuff I post you may educate yourself Yogi

[Rorschach]

I don't know how many time I need to post this but just for you Uber Dummy...

The media attention that Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party had lately received with respect to this issue was dealt with by the re-affirmation that in fighting MAI we are caring not only for our own country but for the whole world - especially the poor majority. It was noted that Australian Democrats and Australian Greens Senators were now very aware of the issue and were preparing themselves for a public and parliamentary campaign.

Hope the font is large enough for you to see this time.

[Rorschach]

And yet another nail....

Australia
In November 1997, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's radio programme "Background Briefing" presented the Quiet Debate—a report about the silence of the Australian government and media on an issue which was arousing fierce controversy in the United States, Britain, Canada and New Zealand. However, Australian activists, including members of Pauline Hanson's One Nation were already studying the leaked MAI draft and corresponding with the Canadian email discussion group MAI-NOT while deciding how to organise a national campaign to link with those of other countries. In January 1998 a national "STOP MAI" coalition was formed to research issues, lobby parliamentarians and conduct public meetings.[27] In November 1998, prior to the opening of OECD negotiations in Paris, the coalition delivered to the meeting's chairman and to the Australian prime minister a protest letter endorsed by over 500 organisations and individuals. The letter was reinforced by a prominent advertisement in The Australian newspaper on 11 November[28]

[Outlaw Yogi]

Like I said this came before the FTAs wanker...

And like I said;

You said no such thing drop kick.

If you had, you would have reposted it in huge text like little girls do.

What you did say/type was;

One Nation was the only party actively working against them when Hanson was in Parliament.

But the facts/history speaks for itself;

Pauline Hanson was in parliament from 24 May 2007 to 1 March 2010.

Howard and Vaile signed us upto our very first FTA (AUSFTA) in 2004. 3 years before Hanson was elected to parliament.

As for Joe Bryant, I never refered to him as a party or member or affiliate of a party.
I refered to him as an entity.

Your English language skills are quite poor. I can accept that, it's probably not your fault.
But pretending you have the requisite skills to debate a topic you knew virtually nothing of til googling it for the sake of partisan blame games is unforgivable.

[Rorschach]

Puhlease...
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_gcA0ZuKGkI8/S ... r_ass2.jpg

[Rorschach]

One more time for the retard...

But the facts/history speaks for itself;

Pauline Hanson was in parliament from 24 May 2007 to 1 March 2010.

Howard and Vaile signed us upto our very first FTA (AUSFTA) in 2004. 3 years before Hanson was elected to parliament.

Your facts are wrong dodo how many times must you be shown

[Outlaw Yogi]

Well when are you going to post something that actually supports your original claim/s?

And when are you going to repost the comment prior to ...

Like I said this came before the FTAs wanker...

... showing you had said what you claim to have said.

So far, for all your googling and lenthy posts, you have still failed to post anything supporting your original claim/s.

I would bet that you haver never won a single debate on any topic with anyone at this site,
but in your schizophrenic mind, you've won them all.

[Rorschach]

Do you really have serious comprehension problems or are you just dishonest.

[Rorschach]

One more time for the retard...

But the facts/history speaks for itself;

Pauline Hanson was in parliament from 24 May 2007 to 1 March 2010.

Howard and Vaile signed us upto our very first FTA (AUSFTA) in 2004. 3 years before Hanson was elected to parliament.

Your facts are wrong dodo how many times must you be shown

Get an adult to explain it to you if you are so retarded you don't get it.